Mechanical adaptation of the right ventricle to secondary tricuspid regurgitation, and its association with patients' outcomes.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zsuzsanna Ladányi, Bálint Károly Lakatos, Alexandra Clement, Michele Tomaselli, Alexandra Fábián, Noela Radu, Tímea Katalin Turschl, Andrea Ferencz, Béla Merkely, Elena Surkova, Attila Kovács, Denisa Muraru, Luigi P Badano
{"title":"Mechanical adaptation of the right ventricle to secondary tricuspid regurgitation, and its association with patients' outcomes.","authors":"Zsuzsanna Ladányi, Bálint Károly Lakatos, Alexandra Clement, Michele Tomaselli, Alexandra Fábián, Noela Radu, Tímea Katalin Turschl, Andrea Ferencz, Béla Merkely, Elena Surkova, Attila Kovács, Denisa Muraru, Luigi P Badano","doi":"10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data regarding the right ventricular (RV) mechanical adaptation to secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We investigated the changes in RV contraction pattern in patients with different STR severity and etiology, and their association with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 205 patients with STR (60% female, age: 77±12 years), in a single-center prospective observational study. We used three-dimensional echocardiography to measure RV ejection fraction (RVEF), the absolute contribution of the RV longitudinal (LEF), radial (REF), and anteroposterior (AEF) ejection fraction components, and their relative contribution by indexing to global RVEF (LEF/RVEF; REF/RVEF; AEF/RVEF). The patients were followed for a median of 9 months. The primary outcome was defined as heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with different STR severity did not differ in terms of RVEF (mild vs. moderate vs. severe, RVEF: 50±11 vs. 49±9 vs. 50±10%, respectively, p=0.085). However, LEF/RVEF was significantly lower in severe STR (0.39±0.08 vs. 0.39±0.09 vs. 0.35±0.10, respectively, p=0.049). Patients with ventricular STR had lower global RVEF (48±10% vs. 53±8%, p=0.001), LEF (18±6% vs. 20±5 %, p=0.043), REF (23±9% vs. 28±8%, p=0.002), and REF/RVEF (0.48±0.012 vs. 0.52±0.09; p=0.040) than patients with atrial STR. In a multivariable Cox regression model, REF/RVEF was a significant and independent predictor of outcomes in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.980 [CI, 0.961-1.000] per 0.01 unit change, p=0.047), while global RVEF was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with STR demonstrate significant functional RV remodelling. Patients with severe STR show a significant decrease in the RV longitudinal shortening. Apart from STR severity, STR etiology also influences the RV contraction pattern, which was associated with outcomes in our cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":50011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2025.02.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data regarding the right ventricular (RV) mechanical adaptation to secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is scarce.

Objectives: We investigated the changes in RV contraction pattern in patients with different STR severity and etiology, and their association with outcomes.

Methods: We enrolled 205 patients with STR (60% female, age: 77±12 years), in a single-center prospective observational study. We used three-dimensional echocardiography to measure RV ejection fraction (RVEF), the absolute contribution of the RV longitudinal (LEF), radial (REF), and anteroposterior (AEF) ejection fraction components, and their relative contribution by indexing to global RVEF (LEF/RVEF; REF/RVEF; AEF/RVEF). The patients were followed for a median of 9 months. The primary outcome was defined as heart failure hospitalization or all-cause death.

Results: Patients with different STR severity did not differ in terms of RVEF (mild vs. moderate vs. severe, RVEF: 50±11 vs. 49±9 vs. 50±10%, respectively, p=0.085). However, LEF/RVEF was significantly lower in severe STR (0.39±0.08 vs. 0.39±0.09 vs. 0.35±0.10, respectively, p=0.049). Patients with ventricular STR had lower global RVEF (48±10% vs. 53±8%, p=0.001), LEF (18±6% vs. 20±5 %, p=0.043), REF (23±9% vs. 28±8%, p=0.002), and REF/RVEF (0.48±0.012 vs. 0.52±0.09; p=0.040) than patients with atrial STR. In a multivariable Cox regression model, REF/RVEF was a significant and independent predictor of outcomes in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.980 [CI, 0.961-1.000] per 0.01 unit change, p=0.047), while global RVEF was not.

Conclusions: Patients with STR demonstrate significant functional RV remodelling. Patients with severe STR show a significant decrease in the RV longitudinal shortening. Apart from STR severity, STR etiology also influences the RV contraction pattern, which was associated with outcomes in our cohort.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
12.30%
发文量
257
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography(JASE) brings physicians and sonographers peer-reviewed original investigations and state-of-the-art review articles that cover conventional clinical applications of cardiovascular ultrasound, as well as newer techniques with emerging clinical applications. These include three-dimensional echocardiography, strain and strain rate methods for evaluating cardiac mechanics and interventional applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信