Chronic pain management for older adults in ambulatory care : Results of a randomized pragmatic trial in Berlin, Germany.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Daniela Koios, Arlett Wenzel, Ronny Kuhnert, Christina Rank, Thomas Günther Riemer, Magdalena Glawe, Reinhold Kreutz, Dagmar Dräger
{"title":"Chronic pain management for older adults in ambulatory care : Results of a randomized pragmatic trial in Berlin, Germany.","authors":"Daniela Koios, Arlett Wenzel, Ronny Kuhnert, Christina Rank, Thomas Günther Riemer, Magdalena Glawe, Reinhold Kreutz, Dagmar Dräger","doi":"10.1007/s00391-025-02429-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain is a major health challenge in older populations and approaches to improve ambulatory care are urgently needed. We conducted a pragmatic trial to test whether staff-directed interventions can improve chronic pain management in older community-dwelling adults and thereby improve their pain situation. Participants of 22 ambulatory nursing services (clusters) were allocated to 3 study arms: I1 (individual intervention with recommendations for each participant's physician and a newly trained pain nurse), I2 (digital training offered for participants' physicians and nursing staff) and CG (control group). Survey-based face to face interviews were held at the participants' homes. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and χ<sup>2</sup>-tests were utilized for data analysis. At baseline, 190 and at follow-up 144 participants were analyzed (24% dropout). Overall, the interventions were only implemented by a small proportion of involved staff. We found significant changes in documented nursing care in I1 but improvements regarding pain medication appropriateness or pain situations of participants could not be achieved. Structural challenges like time and staff shortages as well as the lack of billing options in ambulatory care were identified as major obstacles to substantially improve pain care. Policy makers need to enable appropriate compensation models for chronic pain care at home to enable aging in place for a growing population of older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"129-136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11870945/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-025-02429-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain is a major health challenge in older populations and approaches to improve ambulatory care are urgently needed. We conducted a pragmatic trial to test whether staff-directed interventions can improve chronic pain management in older community-dwelling adults and thereby improve their pain situation. Participants of 22 ambulatory nursing services (clusters) were allocated to 3 study arms: I1 (individual intervention with recommendations for each participant's physician and a newly trained pain nurse), I2 (digital training offered for participants' physicians and nursing staff) and CG (control group). Survey-based face to face interviews were held at the participants' homes. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and χ2-tests were utilized for data analysis. At baseline, 190 and at follow-up 144 participants were analyzed (24% dropout). Overall, the interventions were only implemented by a small proportion of involved staff. We found significant changes in documented nursing care in I1 but improvements regarding pain medication appropriateness or pain situations of participants could not be achieved. Structural challenges like time and staff shortages as well as the lack of billing options in ambulatory care were identified as major obstacles to substantially improve pain care. Policy makers need to enable appropriate compensation models for chronic pain care at home to enable aging in place for a growing population of older adults.

慢性疼痛管理的老年人门诊护理:结果在柏林,德国的一项随机实用试验。
慢性疼痛是老年人面临的主要健康挑战,迫切需要改善门诊护理的方法。我们进行了一项实用试验,以测试工作人员指导的干预措施是否可以改善社区老年人的慢性疼痛管理,从而改善他们的疼痛状况。22个门诊护理服务(组)的参与者被分配到3个研究组:I1(为每个参与者的医生和一名新培训的疼痛护士推荐的个人干预),I2(为参与者的医生和护理人员提供数字培训)和CG(对照组)。以调查为基础的面对面访谈在参与者家中进行。资料分析采用描述性统计、方差分析和χ2检验。基线时,190名参与者被分析,随访时144名参与者被分析(24%退出)。总的来说,只有一小部分参与工作人员执行了干预措施。我们发现I1中记录的护理有显著的变化,但在止痛药适当性或参与者的疼痛情况方面没有得到改善。时间和人员短缺等结构性挑战以及门诊护理中缺乏计费选项被认为是实质性改善疼痛护理的主要障碍。政策制定者需要为家庭慢性疼痛护理提供适当的补偿模式,以便为不断增长的老年人人口提供适当的老龄化服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信