Using digitally delivered measurement-based care in substance use disorder treatment: qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Tessa Frohe, Eliza B Cohn, Madeline C Frost, Tascha R Johnson, Kevin A Hallgren
{"title":"Using digitally delivered measurement-based care in substance use disorder treatment: qualitative analysis of patients' perspectives.","authors":"Tessa Frohe, Eliza B Cohn, Madeline C Frost, Tascha R Johnson, Kevin A Hallgren","doi":"10.1080/00952990.2025.2458626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Measurement-based care (MBC) is a clinical practice where patients complete standardized outcome measures throughout treatment to monitor clinical progress and inform clinical decision-making. However, MBC is rarely adopted in routine substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. We developed a digital MBC system and pilot tested it in an outpatient adult community SUD treatment setting.<i>Objectives:</i> The current study aims to characterize qualitative feedback from the pilot participants about their experiences using the MBC system in SUD treatment, focusing on perceived benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions for improvement.<i>Methods:</i> Participants (<i>N</i> = 30; <i>n</i> = 11 female 37%) completed weekly MBC questionnaires via smartphone for 6 months and completed structured interviews at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks. Themes were identified using a combination of inductive/deductive thematic analysis.<i>Results:</i> Participants highlighted several benefits of using the digital MBC system, including improved self-reflection (e.g. goal clarification, noticing changes over time), treatment enhancement (e.g. improving patient-clinician communication, extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled sessions), and ease-of-use (e.g. brief, understandable questions). Drawbacks were less frequently expressed and included limited integration with clinical care, repetitiveness of questionnaires, and some questions being difficult to answer. Suggestions included making elements more personalized and improving interactivity with the digital interface.<i>Conclusion:</i> Patients report several benefits of integrating digitally delivered MBC into SUD treatment, along with recommendations that may improve its usability and usefulness. Integrating MBC technology into SUD treatment may potentially aid patients by enhancing self-reflection, facilitating more efficient communication with clinicians, and extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled treatment sessions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48957,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2025.2458626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurement-based care (MBC) is a clinical practice where patients complete standardized outcome measures throughout treatment to monitor clinical progress and inform clinical decision-making. However, MBC is rarely adopted in routine substance use disorder (SUD) treatment. We developed a digital MBC system and pilot tested it in an outpatient adult community SUD treatment setting.Objectives: The current study aims to characterize qualitative feedback from the pilot participants about their experiences using the MBC system in SUD treatment, focusing on perceived benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions for improvement.Methods: Participants (N = 30; n = 11 female 37%) completed weekly MBC questionnaires via smartphone for 6 months and completed structured interviews at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks. Themes were identified using a combination of inductive/deductive thematic analysis.Results: Participants highlighted several benefits of using the digital MBC system, including improved self-reflection (e.g. goal clarification, noticing changes over time), treatment enhancement (e.g. improving patient-clinician communication, extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled sessions), and ease-of-use (e.g. brief, understandable questions). Drawbacks were less frequently expressed and included limited integration with clinical care, repetitiveness of questionnaires, and some questions being difficult to answer. Suggestions included making elements more personalized and improving interactivity with the digital interface.Conclusion: Patients report several benefits of integrating digitally delivered MBC into SUD treatment, along with recommendations that may improve its usability and usefulness. Integrating MBC technology into SUD treatment may potentially aid patients by enhancing self-reflection, facilitating more efficient communication with clinicians, and extending the reach of treatment beyond scheduled treatment sessions.

在物质使用障碍治疗中使用数字化交付的基于测量的护理:对患者观点的定性分析。
背景:基于测量的护理(MBC)是一种临床实践,患者在整个治疗过程中完成标准化的结果测量,以监测临床进展并为临床决策提供信息。然而,MBC在常规药物使用障碍(SUD)治疗中很少被采用。我们开发了一个数字MBC系统,并在门诊成人社区SUD治疗环境中进行了试点测试。目的:本研究旨在描述试点参与者关于他们使用MBC系统治疗SUD的经验的定性反馈,重点是感知到的好处、缺点和改进建议。方法:参与者(N = 30;n = 11名女性(37%)在6个月内通过智能手机完成每周MBC问卷调查,并在6周、12周和24周完成结构化访谈。使用归纳/演绎主题分析的组合来确定主题。结果:参与者强调了使用数字MBC系统的几个好处,包括改进自我反思(例如,目标明确,注意到随着时间的变化),治疗增强(例如,改善患者与临床医生的沟通,将治疗范围扩大到预定的疗程之外),以及易用性(例如,简短,可理解的问题)。缺点较少表达,包括与临床护理的整合有限,问卷重复,以及一些问题难以回答。建议包括使元素更加个性化,并改善与数字界面的交互性。结论:患者报告了将数字传输MBC整合到SUD治疗中的几个好处,以及可能提高其可用性和有用性的建议。将MBC技术整合到SUD治疗中,可能会通过增强自我反思、促进与临床医生更有效的沟通、扩大治疗范围,从而潜在地帮助患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse (AJDAA) is an international journal published six times per year and provides an important and stimulating venue for the exchange of ideas between the researchers working in diverse areas, including public policy, epidemiology, neurobiology, and the treatment of addictive disorders. AJDAA includes a wide range of translational research, covering preclinical and clinical aspects of the field. AJDAA covers these topics with focused data presentations and authoritative reviews of timely developments in our field. Manuscripts exploring addictions other than substance use disorders are encouraged. Reviews and Perspectives of emerging fields are given priority consideration. Areas of particular interest include: public health policy; novel research methodologies; human and animal pharmacology; human translational studies, including neuroimaging; pharmacological and behavioral treatments; new modalities of care; molecular and family genetic studies; medicinal use of substances traditionally considered substances of abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信