Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in failed stentless valves: a single-center experience.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Massimo Baudo, Serge Sicouri, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Dimitrios Magouliotis, Francesco Cabrucci, Scott M Goldman, Roberto Rodriguez, Eric M Gnall, Paul M Coady, William A Gray, Sandro Gelsomino, Basel Ramlawi
{"title":"Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in failed stentless valves: a single-center experience.","authors":"Massimo Baudo, Serge Sicouri, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Dimitrios Magouliotis, Francesco Cabrucci, Scott M Goldman, Roberto Rodriguez, Eric M Gnall, Paul M Coady, William A Gray, Sandro Gelsomino, Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.25270/jic/25.00006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) offers an alternative to repeat cardiac surgery in selected patients. However, ViV-TAVI in previously implanted stentless valves is more challenging than in a stented valve. This single-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in stentless valves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from 1476 patients undergoing TAVI between January 2018 and December 2023. The primary study endpoint was 30-day and follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes included Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 technical success, VARC-3 device success, and VARC-3 early safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 patients underwent ViV-TAVI within previously implanted stentless valves. The mean age of the patients was 78.1 ± 9.3 years, with a median STS-PROM score of 4.30 (3.05, 6.75). The mean time between SAVR and TAVI was 14.7 ± 3.9 years. Eight (53.3%) patients presented with severe aortic regurgitation, while 5 (33.3%) patients had severe aortic stenosis. There were no surgical conversions, but a single case of transcatheter heart valve malposition required the deployment of a second valve. One patient died within 30 days. VARC-3 technical success was achieved in 87.6% (n = 13) of patients, device success in 80% (n = 12), and early safety in 73.3% (n = 11). The median follow-up period was 2.9 (range, 1.3-4.3) years, during which 4 patients died.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Careful patient selection is critical for ViV-TAVI procedures because of the high risk of complications, which is increased with stentless valves in addition to the standard risks associated with the ViV procedure. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/25.00006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) offers an alternative to repeat cardiac surgery in selected patients. However, ViV-TAVI in previously implanted stentless valves is more challenging than in a stented valve. This single-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in stentless valves.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from 1476 patients undergoing TAVI between January 2018 and December 2023. The primary study endpoint was 30-day and follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes included Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 technical success, VARC-3 device success, and VARC-3 early safety.

Results: A total of 15 patients underwent ViV-TAVI within previously implanted stentless valves. The mean age of the patients was 78.1 ± 9.3 years, with a median STS-PROM score of 4.30 (3.05, 6.75). The mean time between SAVR and TAVI was 14.7 ± 3.9 years. Eight (53.3%) patients presented with severe aortic regurgitation, while 5 (33.3%) patients had severe aortic stenosis. There were no surgical conversions, but a single case of transcatheter heart valve malposition required the deployment of a second valve. One patient died within 30 days. VARC-3 technical success was achieved in 87.6% (n = 13) of patients, device success in 80% (n = 12), and early safety in 73.3% (n = 11). The median follow-up period was 2.9 (range, 1.3-4.3) years, during which 4 patients died.

Conclusions: Careful patient selection is critical for ViV-TAVI procedures because of the high risk of complications, which is increased with stentless valves in addition to the standard risks associated with the ViV procedure. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

经导管主动脉瓣内植入失败无支架瓣膜:单中心经验。
目的:经导管瓣内主动脉瓣植入术(ViV-TAVI)为特定患者提供了重复心脏手术的替代方法。然而,ViV-TAVI在先前植入的无支架瓣膜中比在有支架瓣膜中更具挑战性。本单中心研究旨在分析ViV-TAVI在无支架瓣膜中的效果。方法:回顾性收集2018年1月至2023年12月期间接受TAVI的1476例患者的数据。主要研究终点为30天及随访死亡率。次要结果包括Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3技术成功、VARC-3器械成功和VARC-3早期安全性。结果:共有15例患者在先前植入的无支架瓣膜内进行了ViV-TAVI。患者平均年龄为78.1±9.3岁,STS-PROM评分中位数为4.30(3.05,6.75)。SAVR和TAVI的平均时间为14.7±3.9年。8例(53.3%)患者出现严重主动脉反流,5例(33.3%)患者出现严重主动脉狭窄。没有手术转换,但一个经导管心脏瓣膜错位的病例需要部署第二个瓣膜。一名患者在30天内死亡。VARC-3技术成功率为87.6% (n = 13),器械成功率为80% (n = 12),早期安全性为73.3% (n = 11)。中位随访时间为2.9年(范围1.3-4.3年),随访期间4例患者死亡。结论:仔细的患者选择对于ViV- tavi手术至关重要,因为并发症的风险很高,除了与ViV手术相关的标准风险外,无支架瓣膜增加了并发症的风险。有必要进行更大规模的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信