Antifungal Natural Products Originating from Endophytic and Rhizospheric Microbes Isolated from Coastal Vegetation.

IF 6.8 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Sumali Lakmini Dissanayake Jayaweera, Thi Thu Hao Van, Daniel Anthony Dias
{"title":"Antifungal Natural Products Originating from Endophytic and Rhizospheric Microbes Isolated from Coastal Vegetation.","authors":"Sumali Lakmini Dissanayake Jayaweera, Thi Thu Hao Van, Daniel Anthony Dias","doi":"10.3390/jox15010032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Candida</i> infections severely impact patients who are immunocompromised. Currently, there are limited options to treat fungal infections, especially drug-resistant-fungal infections. Therefore, investigating alternative or repurposed antifungals is paramount. Endophytic microbes (EMs) and rhizospheric microbes (RMs) emerge as promising reservoirs of bioactive natural compounds. Interestingly, plants that have adapted to various environmental conditions harbour a plethora of microbes producing a variety of bioactive natural products that can be assessed for potential antifungal activity. To date, EMs and RMs residing in coastal plants and their associated antifungals have not been extensively studied or reviewed. Therefore, this comprehensive review will focus on antifungal natural products, extracted from coastal-vegetation-associated microbiota to draw the attention of research in this field. A comprehensive literature search was conducted by examining both Scopus and Google Scholar databases during the period of 2013-2024 related to the following coastal vegetation: mangroves, sand dune plants, salt marsh plants, and seagrasses. To date, 65 novel antifungal compounds derived from coastal-plant EMs and RMs have been identified. Mangroves were found to be the most prominent host harbouring antifungal-producing EMs and RMs compared with other coastal plants. Coastal-plant-associated fungal partners were the most prominent producers of antifungals compared to their bacterial counterparts. Fifty-four fungal-EM/RM derived antifungals have been reported to demonstrate activities against plant pathogenic fungi as well as human fungal pathogens. Most of the bacterial-derived antifungals (11 antifungals) have previously been reported to have antifungal activity against <i>Candida albicans</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":42356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Xenobiotics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11856389/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Xenobiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jox15010032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Candida infections severely impact patients who are immunocompromised. Currently, there are limited options to treat fungal infections, especially drug-resistant-fungal infections. Therefore, investigating alternative or repurposed antifungals is paramount. Endophytic microbes (EMs) and rhizospheric microbes (RMs) emerge as promising reservoirs of bioactive natural compounds. Interestingly, plants that have adapted to various environmental conditions harbour a plethora of microbes producing a variety of bioactive natural products that can be assessed for potential antifungal activity. To date, EMs and RMs residing in coastal plants and their associated antifungals have not been extensively studied or reviewed. Therefore, this comprehensive review will focus on antifungal natural products, extracted from coastal-vegetation-associated microbiota to draw the attention of research in this field. A comprehensive literature search was conducted by examining both Scopus and Google Scholar databases during the period of 2013-2024 related to the following coastal vegetation: mangroves, sand dune plants, salt marsh plants, and seagrasses. To date, 65 novel antifungal compounds derived from coastal-plant EMs and RMs have been identified. Mangroves were found to be the most prominent host harbouring antifungal-producing EMs and RMs compared with other coastal plants. Coastal-plant-associated fungal partners were the most prominent producers of antifungals compared to their bacterial counterparts. Fifty-four fungal-EM/RM derived antifungals have been reported to demonstrate activities against plant pathogenic fungi as well as human fungal pathogens. Most of the bacterial-derived antifungals (11 antifungals) have previously been reported to have antifungal activity against Candida albicans.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
1.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Xenobiotics publishes original studies concerning the beneficial (pharmacology) and detrimental effects (toxicology) of xenobiotics in all organisms. A xenobiotic (“stranger to life”) is defined as a chemical that is not usually found at significant concentrations or expected to reside for long periods in organisms. In addition to man-made chemicals, natural products could also be of interest if they have potent biological properties, special medicinal properties or that a given organism is at risk of exposure in the environment. Topics dealing with abiotic- and biotic-based transformations in various media (xenobiochemistry) and environmental toxicology are also of interest. Areas of interests include the identification of key physical and chemical properties of molecules that predict biological effects and persistence in the environment; the molecular mode of action of xenobiotics; biochemical and physiological interactions leading to change in organism health; pathophysiological interactions of natural and synthetic chemicals; development of biochemical indicators including new “-omics” approaches to identify biomarkers of exposure or effects for xenobiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信