An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2025-02-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/200025
Sahana Lothumalla, Devin C Tomlinson, Isabelle Duguid, Chelsea Wilkins, Natalie D Bayrakdarian, Lauren Hellman, Mary Jannausch, Pam Werner, Adrienne Lapidos, Lara N Coughlin
{"title":"An exploration of Michigan certified peer support specialists' perceptions on tobacco use and additional future supports.","authors":"Sahana Lothumalla, Devin C Tomlinson, Isabelle Duguid, Chelsea Wilkins, Natalie D Bayrakdarian, Lauren Hellman, Mary Jannausch, Pam Werner, Adrienne Lapidos, Lara N Coughlin","doi":"10.18332/tpc/200025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Certified peer support specialists, recovery coaches and community health workers uniquely connect to individuals who smoke through shared experiences. This study examines peers' perceptions of tobacco cessation supports to enhance policy and intervention opportunities in rural and non-rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peers (n=172) responded to a needs assessment available from 30 November 2023 to 1 February 2024. Peers were asked questions about their perceptions of currently available and additional support for tobacco cessation. We report overall ratings of these services, as well as ratings stratified by rurality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over half of peers perceived widely available tobacco cessation services (Quitline, counseling, NRT, medications, peer-to-peer support) as somewhat effective. Peers tended to favor financial accessibility, holistic health approaches, flexible approaches focused on harm reduction, and increased tobacco cessation services awareness, as well as peer support as additional services. When stratified by rurality, more rural-residing peers reported current tobacco cessation services as at least somewhat effective, but called for greater access to these services and/or the need for novel approaches specifically for individuals in rural communities. Rural peers emphasized the importance of more holistic support, cessation services awareness, virtual opportunities, peer-led services, and healthcare provider education for stigma prevention than their urban counterparts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most peers view existing supports as somewhat effective, with peer-to-peer support rated highest. Rural-residing peers favored holistic and virtual supports and urban-residing peers emphasized harm reduction and healthcare coverage, suggesting future cessation efforts within the peer workforce should address rural-specific barriers and leverage community-centered, flexible approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11848760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/200025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Certified peer support specialists, recovery coaches and community health workers uniquely connect to individuals who smoke through shared experiences. This study examines peers' perceptions of tobacco cessation supports to enhance policy and intervention opportunities in rural and non-rural communities.

Methods: Peers (n=172) responded to a needs assessment available from 30 November 2023 to 1 February 2024. Peers were asked questions about their perceptions of currently available and additional support for tobacco cessation. We report overall ratings of these services, as well as ratings stratified by rurality.

Results: Over half of peers perceived widely available tobacco cessation services (Quitline, counseling, NRT, medications, peer-to-peer support) as somewhat effective. Peers tended to favor financial accessibility, holistic health approaches, flexible approaches focused on harm reduction, and increased tobacco cessation services awareness, as well as peer support as additional services. When stratified by rurality, more rural-residing peers reported current tobacco cessation services as at least somewhat effective, but called for greater access to these services and/or the need for novel approaches specifically for individuals in rural communities. Rural peers emphasized the importance of more holistic support, cessation services awareness, virtual opportunities, peer-led services, and healthcare provider education for stigma prevention than their urban counterparts.

Conclusions: Most peers view existing supports as somewhat effective, with peer-to-peer support rated highest. Rural-residing peers favored holistic and virtual supports and urban-residing peers emphasized harm reduction and healthcare coverage, suggesting future cessation efforts within the peer workforce should address rural-specific barriers and leverage community-centered, flexible approaches.

探索密歇根州认证同伴支持专家对烟草使用和未来额外支持的看法。
简介:经过认证的同伴支持专家、康复教练和社区卫生工作者通过分享经验与吸烟者建立独特的联系。本研究调查了同龄人对戒烟支持的看法,以加强农村和非农村社区的政策和干预机会。方法:对2023年11月30日至2024年2月1日进行的需求评估进行了回应的同龄人(n=172)。同龄人被问及他们对目前可获得的和额外的戒烟支持的看法。我们报告这些服务的总体评级,以及按农村分层的评级。结果:超过一半的同龄人认为广泛提供的戒烟服务(戒烟热线、咨询、NRT、药物治疗、同伴对同伴支持)有些效果。同伴倾向于支持财政可及性、整体卫生方法、注重减少危害的灵活方法、提高戒烟服务意识以及同伴支持作为额外服务。当按农村地区分层时,更多居住在农村的同龄人报告说,目前的戒烟服务至少在一定程度上是有效的,但要求更多地获得这些服务和/或需要针对农村社区个人的新方法。与城市同行相比,农村同行强调了更全面的支持、戒烟服务意识、虚拟机会、同行主导的服务和卫生保健提供者预防耻辱教育的重要性。结论:大多数同伴认为现有的支持是有效的,同伴对同伴的支持评价最高。居住在农村的同伴青睐整体和虚拟支持,而居住在城市的同伴则强调减少伤害和医疗保健覆盖,这表明未来在同伴工作队伍中开展的戒烟工作应解决农村特有的障碍,并利用以社区为中心的灵活方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信