Combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sahib Singh, Aakash Garg, Ukaya S Tantry, Kevin Bliden, Paul A Gurbel, Ajay Kochar, Michael G Nanna, Abdulla A Damluji
{"title":"Combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy in calcified coronary lesions: a meta-analysis.","authors":"Sahib Singh, Aakash Garg, Ukaya S Tantry, Kevin Bliden, Paul A Gurbel, Ajay Kochar, Michael G Nanna, Abdulla A Damluji","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Studies exploring the feasibility and safety of combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions are limited. The authors aimed to study the pooled evidence for the safety and efficacy of this combined approach in severely calcified coronary lesions and evaluate its clinical and procedural outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Online databases were searched for studies using combined atherectomy (rotational, orbital, or excimer laser) and IVL during PCI for calcified coronary lesions. The outcomes of interest were acute procedural success, periprocedural complications, and cardiovascular (CV) events. Pooled proportions with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 observational studies with 720 patients were included. The mean age was 73 years, 76% were men, and 48% of the patients had an acute coronary syndrome. The pooled procedural success rate of combined atherectomy and IVL was 93% (95% CI, 89.56-96.25). Coronary perforation occurred in 2.9% (95% CI, 1.76-4.36) of the cases. Over a mean follow-up of 111 days, the incidence of CV outcomes was myocardial infarction 2.0% (95% CI, 0.67-3.93), stroke 1.4% (95% CI, 0.36-3.14), target vessel revascularization 2.2% (95% CI, 1.01-3.79), stent thrombosis 1.1% (95% CI, 0.21-2.84), major bleeding 5.8% (95% CI, 0.00-21.40), CV death 3.6% (95% CI, 1.53-6.42), and all-cause death 4.8% (95% CI, 2.75-7.33).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined atherectomy and IVL for calcified coronary lesions is feasible with a high procedural success rate. However, there is a low but meaningful risk of procedural complications including coronary perforations, and a low risk of adverse CV events.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Studies exploring the feasibility and safety of combined atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions are limited. The authors aimed to study the pooled evidence for the safety and efficacy of this combined approach in severely calcified coronary lesions and evaluate its clinical and procedural outcomes.

Methods: Online databases were searched for studies using combined atherectomy (rotational, orbital, or excimer laser) and IVL during PCI for calcified coronary lesions. The outcomes of interest were acute procedural success, periprocedural complications, and cardiovascular (CV) events. Pooled proportions with 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model.

Results: A total of 12 observational studies with 720 patients were included. The mean age was 73 years, 76% were men, and 48% of the patients had an acute coronary syndrome. The pooled procedural success rate of combined atherectomy and IVL was 93% (95% CI, 89.56-96.25). Coronary perforation occurred in 2.9% (95% CI, 1.76-4.36) of the cases. Over a mean follow-up of 111 days, the incidence of CV outcomes was myocardial infarction 2.0% (95% CI, 0.67-3.93), stroke 1.4% (95% CI, 0.36-3.14), target vessel revascularization 2.2% (95% CI, 1.01-3.79), stent thrombosis 1.1% (95% CI, 0.21-2.84), major bleeding 5.8% (95% CI, 0.00-21.40), CV death 3.6% (95% CI, 1.53-6.42), and all-cause death 4.8% (95% CI, 2.75-7.33).

Conclusions: Combined atherectomy and IVL for calcified coronary lesions is feasible with a high procedural success rate. However, there is a low but meaningful risk of procedural complications including coronary perforations, and a low risk of adverse CV events.

联合动脉粥样硬化切除术和血管内碎石术治疗钙化冠状动脉病变:荟萃分析。
目的:探讨联合动脉粥样硬化切除术和血管内碎石术(IVL)治疗严重钙化冠状动脉病变的可行性和安全性的研究有限。作者旨在研究这种联合方法治疗严重钙化冠状动脉病变的安全性和有效性,并评估其临床和手术结果。方法:在线数据库检索在PCI治疗钙化冠状动脉病变过程中使用联合动脉粥样硬化切除术(旋转、轨道或准分子激光)和IVL的研究。结果感兴趣的是急性手术成功,围手术期并发症和心血管(CV)事件。采用随机效应模型计算95% CI的合并比例。结果:共纳入12项观察性研究,720例患者。平均年龄73岁,76%为男性,48%的患者患有急性冠状动脉综合征。联合动脉粥样硬化切除术和IVL的总手术成功率为93% (95% CI, 89.56-96.25)。冠脉穿孔发生率为2.9% (95% CI, 1.76 ~ 4.36)。在平均111天的随访中,CV结果的发生率为心肌梗死2.0% (95% CI, 0.67-3.93),卒中1.4% (95% CI, 0.36-3.14),靶血管重建术2.2% (95% CI, 1.01-3.79),支架血栓形成1.1% (95% CI, 0.21-2.84),大出血5.8% (95% CI, 0.21- 21.40), CV死亡3.6% (95% CI, 1.53-6.42),全因死亡4.8% (95% CI, 2.75-7.33)。结论:动脉粥样硬化联合IVL治疗钙化冠状动脉病变是可行的,手术成功率高。然而,手术并发症(包括冠状动脉穿孔)和不良心血管事件的风险较低,但有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信