Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs.

IF 1.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Meghan R Smith, Stephen D Cole, Rachel W Williams, Cassie N Lux, Garrett J Davis, Samuel Levy, William T N Culp, David E Holt
{"title":"Comparison of bacteria cultured during a total ear canal ablation and subsequent incisional dehiscence in 12 dogs.","authors":"Meghan R Smith, Stephen D Cole, Rachel W Williams, Cassie N Lux, Garrett J Davis, Samuel Levy, William T N Culp, David E Holt","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare bacteria cultured at the time of total ear canal ablation (TECA) to bacteria cultured from post-TECA incisional dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Multicenter retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Animal population: </strong>Dogs (n = 12) with incisional dehiscence following TECA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of dogs that had a TECA between August 1, 2015, and August 1, 2023, with a subsequent incisional dehiscence within 5 weeks of surgery were reviewed. Aerobic cultures were performed at the time of surgery and time of incisional dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common organisms cultured from TECA samples included Staphylococcus spp. (5/12, 41.7%), Enterococcus spp. (3/12, 25%), Streptococcus spp. (3/12, 25%), Escherichia coli (2/12, 16.7%), and Corynebacterium spp. (2/12, 16.7%). The organisms most commonly isolated from incisional dehiscences were Staphylococcus spp. (10/12, 83.3%) and Escherichia coli (5/12, 41.7%). The median time for incisional dehiscence was 11.5 days postoperatively (range, 2-34 days). The same single bacteria species, Staphylococcus schleiferi, was identified from the TECA and incisional dehiscence cultures in only one dog (1/12, 8.3%). In 6/12 (50%) dogs, the same bacteria were cultured before or during TECA and at the time of incisional dehiscence, but additional organisms were also identified. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were different in four of seven dogs where the same bacteria were cultured prior to and during incisional dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cultures performed during TECA were not predictive of culture results at the time of dehiscence. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns often changed when the same organism was cultured prior to and at incisional dehiscence.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Repeating cultures is essential to treat infectious incisional dehiscence following TECA appropriately.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14233","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare bacteria cultured at the time of total ear canal ablation (TECA) to bacteria cultured from post-TECA incisional dehiscence.

Study design: Multicenter retrospective case series.

Animal population: Dogs (n = 12) with incisional dehiscence following TECA.

Methods: Medical records of dogs that had a TECA between August 1, 2015, and August 1, 2023, with a subsequent incisional dehiscence within 5 weeks of surgery were reviewed. Aerobic cultures were performed at the time of surgery and time of incisional dehiscence.

Results: The most common organisms cultured from TECA samples included Staphylococcus spp. (5/12, 41.7%), Enterococcus spp. (3/12, 25%), Streptococcus spp. (3/12, 25%), Escherichia coli (2/12, 16.7%), and Corynebacterium spp. (2/12, 16.7%). The organisms most commonly isolated from incisional dehiscences were Staphylococcus spp. (10/12, 83.3%) and Escherichia coli (5/12, 41.7%). The median time for incisional dehiscence was 11.5 days postoperatively (range, 2-34 days). The same single bacteria species, Staphylococcus schleiferi, was identified from the TECA and incisional dehiscence cultures in only one dog (1/12, 8.3%). In 6/12 (50%) dogs, the same bacteria were cultured before or during TECA and at the time of incisional dehiscence, but additional organisms were also identified. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns were different in four of seven dogs where the same bacteria were cultured prior to and during incisional dehiscence.

Conclusion: Cultures performed during TECA were not predictive of culture results at the time of dehiscence. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns often changed when the same organism was cultured prior to and at incisional dehiscence.

Clinical significance: Repeating cultures is essential to treat infectious incisional dehiscence following TECA appropriately.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Surgery
Veterinary Surgery 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations. It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信