Impact of Emission Standards on Fine Particulate Matter Toxicity: A Long-Term Analysis in Los Angeles.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI:10.3390/toxics13020140
Mohammad Mahdi Badami, Yashar Aghaei, Constantinos Sioutas
{"title":"Impact of Emission Standards on Fine Particulate Matter Toxicity: A Long-Term Analysis in Los Angeles.","authors":"Mohammad Mahdi Badami, Yashar Aghaei, Constantinos Sioutas","doi":"10.3390/toxics13020140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines long-term trends in fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) composition and oxidative potential in Los Angeles based on data from the University of Southern California's Particle Instrumentation Unit, with chemical composition retrieved from the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). While regulatory interventions have reduced PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentration and primary combustion-related components, our findings reveal a more complex toxicity pattern. From 2001 to 2008, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> oxidative potential, measured via the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, declined from ~0.84 to ~0.16 nmol/min/m<sup>3</sup> under stringent tailpipe controls. However, after this initial decline, PM<sub>2.5</sub> DTT stabilized and gradually increased from ~0.35 in 2012 to ~0.97 nmol/min/m<sup>3</sup> by 2024, reflecting the growing influence of non-tailpipe emissions such as brake/tire wear. Metals, such as iron (Fe, ~150 ng/m<sup>3</sup>) and zinc (Zn, ~10 ng/m<sup>3</sup>), remained relatively stable as organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) declined, resulting in non-tailpipe contributions dominating PM<sub>2.5</sub> toxicity. Although PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations were effectively reduced, the growing contribution of non-tailpipe emissions (e.g., brake/tire wear and secondary organic aerosols) underscores the limitations of mass-based standards and tailpipe-focused strategies. Our findings emphasize the need to broaden regulatory strategies, targeting emerging sources that shape PM<sub>2.5</sub> composition and toxicity and ensuring more improvements in public health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13020140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines long-term trends in fine particulate matter (PM2.5) composition and oxidative potential in Los Angeles based on data from the University of Southern California's Particle Instrumentation Unit, with chemical composition retrieved from the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS). While regulatory interventions have reduced PM2.5 mass concentration and primary combustion-related components, our findings reveal a more complex toxicity pattern. From 2001 to 2008, the PM2.5 oxidative potential, measured via the dithiothreitol (DTT) assay, declined from ~0.84 to ~0.16 nmol/min/m3 under stringent tailpipe controls. However, after this initial decline, PM2.5 DTT stabilized and gradually increased from ~0.35 in 2012 to ~0.97 nmol/min/m3 by 2024, reflecting the growing influence of non-tailpipe emissions such as brake/tire wear. Metals, such as iron (Fe, ~150 ng/m3) and zinc (Zn, ~10 ng/m3), remained relatively stable as organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) declined, resulting in non-tailpipe contributions dominating PM2.5 toxicity. Although PM2.5 mass concentrations were effectively reduced, the growing contribution of non-tailpipe emissions (e.g., brake/tire wear and secondary organic aerosols) underscores the limitations of mass-based standards and tailpipe-focused strategies. Our findings emphasize the need to broaden regulatory strategies, targeting emerging sources that shape PM2.5 composition and toxicity and ensuring more improvements in public health outcomes.

本研究根据南加州大学粒子仪器部门提供的数据,以及从美国环保署空气质量系统(AQS)中获取的化学成分,研究了洛杉矶细颗粒物(PM2.5)成分和氧化潜能的长期趋势。虽然监管干预措施降低了 PM2.5 的质量浓度和与燃烧相关的主要成分,但我们的研究结果揭示了一种更为复杂的毒性模式。从 2001 年到 2008 年,在严格的尾气控制措施下,通过二硫苏糖醇(DTT)测定法测量的 PM2.5 氧化潜能值从约 0.84 nmol/min/m3 下降到约 0.16 nmol/min/m3。然而,在最初的下降之后,PM2.5 的 DTT 趋于稳定,并从 2012 年的 ~0.35 逐步上升到 2024 年的 ~0.97 nmol/min/m3,这反映了制动/轮胎磨损等非尾气排放的影响越来越大。铁(Fe,约 150 纳克/立方米)和锌(Zn,约 10 纳克/立方米)等金属保持相对稳定,而有机碳和元素碳(OC 和 EC)则有所下降,这导致非尾气排放在 PM2.5 毒性中占主导地位。虽然 PM2.5 的质量浓度得到了有效降低,但非尾气排放(如制动/轮胎磨损和二次有机气溶胶)的贡献越来越大,这凸显了基于质量的标准和以尾气为重点的策略的局限性。我们的研究结果强调,有必要拓宽监管策略,针对影响 PM2.5 成分和毒性的新兴来源,确保公共卫生成果得到更多改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信