Association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Copy Number Variation with Chromosomal Aberrations in Nuclear Power Plant Workers Exposed to Occupational Ionizing Radiation.

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.3390/toxics13020073
Joong Won Lee, Younghyun Lee, Yang Jee Kim
{"title":"Association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Copy Number Variation with Chromosomal Aberrations in Nuclear Power Plant Workers Exposed to Occupational Ionizing Radiation.","authors":"Joong Won Lee, Younghyun Lee, Yang Jee Kim","doi":"10.3390/toxics13020073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in occupational settings raises concerns about chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and their potential impact on genomic stability. Copy number variations (CNVs), structural genomic changes, influence susceptibility to environmental stressors and radiation-induced damage. This study analyzed CAs in 180 nuclear power plant workers exposed to occupational radiation and 45 controls, stratified by GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNVs. Workers exhibited significantly higher frequencies of chromatid-type and chromosome-type aberrations, of 5.47 and 3.01 per 500 cells, respectively, compared to 3.57 and 0.64 in controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001 for both). In the relatively high-exposure group, chromatid-type aberrations decreased with increasing GSTM1 and GSTT1 copy numbers. For GSTM1, individuals with zero copies showed 6.37 ± 3.47 aberrations per 500 cells, compared to 5.02 ± 3.05 for one copy and 4.67 ± 2.40 for two or more copies (<i>p</i> = 0.06). A similar trend was observed for GSTT1, with 6.00 ± 3.29 aberrations per 500 cells for zero copies, 5.38 ± 2.79 for one copy, and 4.11 ± 4.26 for two or more copies (<i>p</i> = 0.05). Poisson regression analysis further supported these findings after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, smoking status, and alcohol intake. Workers with null genotypes exhibited a 1.36-fold increase in chromatid-type aberrations compared to those with higher copy numbers under relatively high-exposure conditions, suggesting a synergy effect between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in modulating radiation-induced aberrations. These findings underscore the role of genetic susceptibility, particularly involving GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNVs, in modulating radiation-induced chromosomal damage. The observed gene-environment interaction in the relatively high-exposure group suggests that pre-existing CNVs contribute to chromosomal instability under radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13020073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in occupational settings raises concerns about chromosomal aberrations (CAs) and their potential impact on genomic stability. Copy number variations (CNVs), structural genomic changes, influence susceptibility to environmental stressors and radiation-induced damage. This study analyzed CAs in 180 nuclear power plant workers exposed to occupational radiation and 45 controls, stratified by GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNVs. Workers exhibited significantly higher frequencies of chromatid-type and chromosome-type aberrations, of 5.47 and 3.01 per 500 cells, respectively, compared to 3.57 and 0.64 in controls (p < 0.001 for both). In the relatively high-exposure group, chromatid-type aberrations decreased with increasing GSTM1 and GSTT1 copy numbers. For GSTM1, individuals with zero copies showed 6.37 ± 3.47 aberrations per 500 cells, compared to 5.02 ± 3.05 for one copy and 4.67 ± 2.40 for two or more copies (p = 0.06). A similar trend was observed for GSTT1, with 6.00 ± 3.29 aberrations per 500 cells for zero copies, 5.38 ± 2.79 for one copy, and 4.11 ± 4.26 for two or more copies (p = 0.05). Poisson regression analysis further supported these findings after adjusting for potential confounders such as age, smoking status, and alcohol intake. Workers with null genotypes exhibited a 1.36-fold increase in chromatid-type aberrations compared to those with higher copy numbers under relatively high-exposure conditions, suggesting a synergy effect between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in modulating radiation-induced aberrations. These findings underscore the role of genetic susceptibility, particularly involving GSTM1 and GSTT1 CNVs, in modulating radiation-induced chromosomal damage. The observed gene-environment interaction in the relatively high-exposure group suggests that pre-existing CNVs contribute to chromosomal instability under radiation exposure.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信