Deep learning-based Intraoperative MRI reconstruction.

IF 3.6 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jon André Ottesen, Tryggve Storas, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Grethe Løvland, Einar Osland Vik-Mo, Till Schellhorn, Karoline Skogen, Christopher Larsson, Atle Bjørnerud, Inge Rasmus Groote-Eindbaas, Matthan W A Caan
{"title":"Deep learning-based Intraoperative MRI reconstruction.","authors":"Jon André Ottesen, Tryggve Storas, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Grethe Løvland, Einar Osland Vik-Mo, Till Schellhorn, Karoline Skogen, Christopher Larsson, Atle Bjørnerud, Inge Rasmus Groote-Eindbaas, Matthan W A Caan","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00548-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the quality of deep learning (DL) reconstructions of on-scanner accelerated intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during respective brain tumor surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerated iMRI was performed using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A DL model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. The evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged from Nov 1, 2021, to June 1, 2023, who underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon using a 1-to-5 Likert scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, poor; 3, acceptable; 4, good; and 5, excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the evaluation metrics, the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL shows promise in allowing for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. The neuroradiologists noted an improvement in the perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to CS, while the neurosurgeon preferred the CS reconstructions across all metrics.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI, however, due to the challenging setting of iMRI, further optimization is needed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>iMRI is a surgical tool with a challenging image setting. DL allowed for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. Additional optimization is needed due to the challenging intraoperative setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11861787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00548-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively evaluated the quality of deep learning (DL) reconstructions of on-scanner accelerated intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during respective brain tumor surgery.

Methods: Accelerated iMRI was performed using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A DL model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. The evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged from Nov 1, 2021, to June 1, 2023, who underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon using a 1-to-5 Likert scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, poor; 3, acceptable; 4, good; and 5, excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant.

Results: The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the evaluation metrics, the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal.

Conclusion: DL shows promise in allowing for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. The neuroradiologists noted an improvement in the perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to CS, while the neurosurgeon preferred the CS reconstructions across all metrics.

Relevance statement: DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI, however, due to the challenging setting of iMRI, further optimization is needed.

Key points: iMRI is a surgical tool with a challenging image setting. DL allowed for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. Additional optimization is needed due to the challenging intraoperative setting.

基于深度学习的术中MRI重建。
背景:我们回顾性地评估了各自脑肿瘤手术中扫描加速术中MRI (iMRI)的深度学习(DL)重建的质量。方法:采用双表面线圈在切除区域周围进行加速iMRI。在fastMRI神经数据集上训练DL模型来模拟来自iMRI协议的数据。对40例患者的影像学资料进行评估,这些患者于2021年11月1日至2023年6月1日在肿瘤切除手术期间接受了iMRI。对比分析了传统的压缩感觉(CS)方法和训练好的DL重建方法。两名神经放射学家和一名神经外科医生采用1到5的李克特量表(1,非诊断性;2、贫穷;3,可以接受;4,好;5,优秀),以及最受欢迎的重建变体。结果:读卡器1、2、3中分别有33/40、39/40、8/40的病例强烈赞成或赞成DL重建。在评价指标方面,读者1、2和3的DL重建分别有72%、72%和14%的病例比CS重建得分更高。尽管如此,深度学习重建仍然表现出条带伪影和信号减少等缺点。结论:深度学习有希望实现高质量的iMRI重建。与CS相比,神经放射学家注意到感知空间分辨率、信噪比、诊断置信度、诊断显著性和空间分辨率的改善,而神经外科医生更喜欢CS重建所有指标。相关性声明:深度学习有望实现高质量的iMRI重建,然而,由于iMRI的挑战性设置,需要进一步优化。iMRI是一种具有挑战性的图像设置的手术工具。DL可以实现高质量的iMRI重建。由于具有挑战性的术中环境,需要额外的优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信