Deep learning-based Intraoperative MRI reconstruction.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jon André Ottesen, Tryggve Storas, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Grethe Løvland, Einar Osland Vik-Mo, Till Schellhorn, Karoline Skogen, Christopher Larsson, Atle Bjørnerud, Inge Rasmus Groote-Eindbaas, Matthan W A Caan
{"title":"Deep learning-based Intraoperative MRI reconstruction.","authors":"Jon André Ottesen, Tryggve Storas, Svein Are Sirirud Vatnehol, Grethe Løvland, Einar Osland Vik-Mo, Till Schellhorn, Karoline Skogen, Christopher Larsson, Atle Bjørnerud, Inge Rasmus Groote-Eindbaas, Matthan W A Caan","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00548-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated the quality of deep learning (DL) reconstructions of on-scanner accelerated intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during respective brain tumor surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerated iMRI was performed using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A DL model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. The evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged from Nov 1, 2021, to June 1, 2023, who underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon using a 1-to-5 Likert scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, poor; 3, acceptable; 4, good; and 5, excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the evaluation metrics, the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DL shows promise in allowing for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. The neuroradiologists noted an improvement in the perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to CS, while the neurosurgeon preferred the CS reconstructions across all metrics.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong>DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI, however, due to the challenging setting of iMRI, further optimization is needed.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>iMRI is a surgical tool with a challenging image setting. DL allowed for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. Additional optimization is needed due to the challenging intraoperative setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"9 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00548-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We retrospectively evaluated the quality of deep learning (DL) reconstructions of on-scanner accelerated intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during respective brain tumor surgery.

Methods: Accelerated iMRI was performed using dual surface coils positioned around the area of resection. A DL model was trained on the fastMRI neuro dataset to mimic the data from the iMRI protocol. The evaluation was performed on imaging material from 40 patients imaged from Nov 1, 2021, to June 1, 2023, who underwent iMRI during tumor resection surgery. A comparative analysis was conducted between the conventional compressed sense (CS) method and the trained DL reconstruction method. Blinded evaluation of multiple image quality metrics was performed by two neuroradiologists and one neurosurgeon using a 1-to-5 Likert scale (1, nondiagnostic; 2, poor; 3, acceptable; 4, good; and 5, excellent), and the favored reconstruction variant.

Results: The DL reconstruction was strongly favored or favored over the CS reconstruction for 33/40, 39/40, and 8/40 of cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the evaluation metrics, the DL reconstructions had a higher score than their respective CS counterparts for 72%, 72%, and 14% of the cases for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Still, the DL reconstructions exhibited shortcomings such as a striping artifact and reduced signal.

Conclusion: DL shows promise in allowing for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. The neuroradiologists noted an improvement in the perceived spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio, diagnostic confidence, diagnostic conspicuity, and spatial resolution compared to CS, while the neurosurgeon preferred the CS reconstructions across all metrics.

Relevance statement: DL shows promise to allow for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI, however, due to the challenging setting of iMRI, further optimization is needed.

Key points: iMRI is a surgical tool with a challenging image setting. DL allowed for high-quality reconstructions of iMRI. Additional optimization is needed due to the challenging intraoperative setting.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信