Community-driven strategies for implementing suicide prevention education in jails.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Melissa J Zielinski, Cassandra L McLaughlan, Tasfia Jahangir, Chelsey E Bull, Susie Reece, M Kathryn Allison
{"title":"Community-driven strategies for implementing suicide prevention education in jails.","authors":"Melissa J Zielinski, Cassandra L McLaughlan, Tasfia Jahangir, Chelsey E Bull, Susie Reece, M Kathryn Allison","doi":"10.1037/ser0000927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide comprises nearly one third of jail deaths, but strategies for effectively supporting implementation of suicide prevention education in jails are understudied. Here, we aimed to identify and pilot strategies to promote uptake of a brief suicide prevention education program, <i>Talk Saves Lives: Corrections (TSL-C),</i> developed by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, in jails. Applying community-engaged dissemination and implementation principles, we conducted a statewide survey of jail leadership in a mid-Southern state (<i>N</i> = 65 jails) to (a) understand the preimplementation landscape of suicide prevention education efforts and (b) assess the perceived feasibility and helpfulness of possible strategies to promote TSL-C uptake. With continuous input from our community advisory board, we then partnered with two jails to select and tailor implementation strategies via a rigorous Evidence-Based Quality Improvement process and pilot TSL-C. Statewide survey results revealed insufficient rates of foundational (50.8%) and refresher (27.7%) suicide prevention training; however, receptivity to proposed implementation strategies was very high. Through the Evidence-Based Quality Improvement process, partnering sites selected both overlapping (i.e., identifying local champions, tailoring materials, and providing train-the-trainer training) and divergent strategies. A primary difference between the sites was their implementation teams' structure. Both sites successfully piloted the TSL-C program facility-wide by the end of the study period, though one site significantly revised their implementation plan due to staffing shortages and financial barriers. Together, our results indicate that although carceral settings face barriers to implementing and sustaining health-focused interventions, community-developed implementation strategies can help support uptake in these underresourced but high-need contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000927","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide comprises nearly one third of jail deaths, but strategies for effectively supporting implementation of suicide prevention education in jails are understudied. Here, we aimed to identify and pilot strategies to promote uptake of a brief suicide prevention education program, Talk Saves Lives: Corrections (TSL-C), developed by the American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, in jails. Applying community-engaged dissemination and implementation principles, we conducted a statewide survey of jail leadership in a mid-Southern state (N = 65 jails) to (a) understand the preimplementation landscape of suicide prevention education efforts and (b) assess the perceived feasibility and helpfulness of possible strategies to promote TSL-C uptake. With continuous input from our community advisory board, we then partnered with two jails to select and tailor implementation strategies via a rigorous Evidence-Based Quality Improvement process and pilot TSL-C. Statewide survey results revealed insufficient rates of foundational (50.8%) and refresher (27.7%) suicide prevention training; however, receptivity to proposed implementation strategies was very high. Through the Evidence-Based Quality Improvement process, partnering sites selected both overlapping (i.e., identifying local champions, tailoring materials, and providing train-the-trainer training) and divergent strategies. A primary difference between the sites was their implementation teams' structure. Both sites successfully piloted the TSL-C program facility-wide by the end of the study period, though one site significantly revised their implementation plan due to staffing shortages and financial barriers. Together, our results indicate that although carceral settings face barriers to implementing and sustaining health-focused interventions, community-developed implementation strategies can help support uptake in these underresourced but high-need contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信