The Prevalence of Refractive Errors in Indian School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vijay Kumar, Manya Soni, Vineeth Rajagopal, Ashish Behera, Aravind Gandhi, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Shilpa Gaidhane, Sarvesh Rustagi, Nishant Rai, Sanjit Sah, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Sonam Puri, Vaibhav Jaiswal, Mahendra Singh, Ganesh Bushi, Prakasini Satapathy
{"title":"The Prevalence of Refractive Errors in Indian School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Vijay Kumar, Manya Soni, Vineeth Rajagopal, Ashish Behera, Aravind Gandhi, Muhammad Aaqib Shamim, Shilpa Gaidhane, Sarvesh Rustagi, Nishant Rai, Sanjit Sah, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Sonam Puri, Vaibhav Jaiswal, Mahendra Singh, Ganesh Bushi, Prakasini Satapathy","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2025.2450346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Refractive errors (REs) are a significant cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are the most prevalent forms. In developing regions, including India, the prevalence and impact of REs, particularly among school-aged children, is profound, affecting their academic performance and overall quality of life.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review aimed to consolidate data from studies published post-2018 to provide updated prevalence estimates of REs among Indian school children. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in May 2024 across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Inclusion criteria focused on cross-sectional studies from India, reporting the prevalence of REs among school-aged children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1434 studies, 43 met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of REs was 11% (95% CI: 0.08-0.15). The subgroup analysis showed a slight decline in prevalence post-COVID-19, from 12% to 11%. Prevalence was higher in cycloplegic studies at 12%, compared to 10% in non-cycloplegic. Myopia was the most prevalent RE at 8%, with astigmatism at 3% and hyperopia at 1%. No significant gender differences were found. The meta-regression does not indicate a statistically significant relation between the year of publication and the prevalence of RE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>REs, particularly myopia, pose a significant burden among Indian schoolchildren. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall prevalence of REs has remained stable. These findings emphasize the need for continued vision screening programs and targeted interventions to reduce the prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2025.2450346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Refractive errors (REs) are a significant cause of vision impairment and the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are the most prevalent forms. In developing regions, including India, the prevalence and impact of REs, particularly among school-aged children, is profound, affecting their academic performance and overall quality of life.

Methods: This review aimed to consolidate data from studies published post-2018 to provide updated prevalence estimates of REs among Indian school children. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in May 2024 across four databases: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. Inclusion criteria focused on cross-sectional studies from India, reporting the prevalence of REs among school-aged children.

Results: Out of 1434 studies, 43 met the inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of REs was 11% (95% CI: 0.08-0.15). The subgroup analysis showed a slight decline in prevalence post-COVID-19, from 12% to 11%. Prevalence was higher in cycloplegic studies at 12%, compared to 10% in non-cycloplegic. Myopia was the most prevalent RE at 8%, with astigmatism at 3% and hyperopia at 1%. No significant gender differences were found. The meta-regression does not indicate a statistically significant relation between the year of publication and the prevalence of RE.

Conclusion: REs, particularly myopia, pose a significant burden among Indian schoolchildren. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, the overall prevalence of REs has remained stable. These findings emphasize the need for continued vision screening programs and targeted interventions to reduce the prevalence of uncorrected refractive errors.

印度学童屈光不正患病率:系统回顾与荟萃分析。
目的:屈光不正(REs)是视力损害的重要原因,也是世界范围内致盲的第二大原因。近视、远视和散光是最常见的形式。在包括印度在内的发展中地区,REs的流行和影响是深远的,特别是在学龄儿童中,影响着他们的学习成绩和整体生活质量。方法:本综述旨在整合2018年后发表的研究数据,以提供最新的印度学龄儿童REs患病率估计。根据PRISMA指南,在2024年5月对四个数据库进行了全面的文献检索:Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus和Embase。纳入标准侧重于来自印度的横断面研究,报告了REs在学龄儿童中的患病率。结果:1434项研究中,43项符合纳入标准。REs的总总患病率为11% (95% CI: 0.08-0.15)。亚组分析显示,covid -19后的患病率略有下降,从12%降至11%。在单眼截瘫研究中,患病率为12%,而在非单眼截瘫研究中为10%。近视是最常见的,占8%,散光占3%,远视占1%。没有发现显著的性别差异。meta回归并未显示出版年份与REs患病率之间存在统计学上的显著关系。结论:REs,尤其是近视,在印度学童中构成了显著的负担。尽管2019冠状病毒病大流行,但REs的总体流行率保持稳定。这些发现强调需要持续的视力筛查项目和有针对性的干预措施,以减少未矫正屈光不正的患病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信