Comparative toxicity study of three surface-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles following subacute inhalation.

IF 8.2 1区 医学 Q1 TOXICOLOGY
Dirk Schaudien, Tanja Hansen, Thomas Tillmann, Gerd Pohlmann, Heiko Kock, Otto Creutzenberg
{"title":"Comparative toxicity study of three surface-modified titanium dioxide nanoparticles following subacute inhalation.","authors":"Dirk Schaudien, Tanja Hansen, Thomas Tillmann, Gerd Pohlmann, Heiko Kock, Otto Creutzenberg","doi":"10.1186/s12989-025-00620-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the toxic effects of three different titanium dioxide nanoparticles encoded in the European nanomaterial repository as NM-103 (rutile, hydrophobic), NM-104 (rutile, hydrophilic), and NM-105 (anatase/rutile, hydrophilic), suggesting different toxic potentials after uptake in the lungs. Wistar rats were exposed by nose-only inhalation to aerosol concentrations of 3, 12 and 48 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for 4 weeks. This dosing scheme should induce non, partial and complete lung overload. The 4-week inhalation period was followed by 3-, 45- and 94-day exposure-free periods. Investigations according to the OECD 412 guideline were performed. Additional examinations, such as transmission electron microscopy and image analysis of tissue slides and cytospots, were performed to reveal possible differences among the three particle types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from the groups exposed to low concentrations of NM-103 or NM-104 presented slight inflammation. In the mid- and high-exposure groups, this was also present for the NM-105 group, however, weaker than those of NM-103 and NM-104. Histologically, all three groups presented similar distributions of particles in the respiratory tract. Although marginal differences in the degree of some changes exist, no obvious differences in the degree or characteristics of the induced lesions were observable. In general, compared with the higher exposure groups, all the middle exposure groups presented a greater accumulation and aggregation of macrophages at the terminal bronchi. Using transmission electron microscopy, particles were detected mainly in intraalveolar macrophages, followed by type 1 pneumocytes in the low- and mid-concentration groups and intraalveolar free particles in the high-concentration groups. Compared with the other groups, the NM-103 group presented greater numbers of free particles in the alveoli and fewer in the macrophages. With image analysis, the movement of particles to the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue and lymph nodes could be detected comparably for the three different particle types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The no observed adverse effect concentration was 3 mg/m<sup>3</sup> for all three different TiO<sub>2</sub> particles. Despite minimal differences, a ranking mainly based on granulocyte influx into the lung was NM-104 > NM-103 > NM-105.</p>","PeriodicalId":19847,"journal":{"name":"Particle and Fibre Toxicology","volume":"22 1","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Particle and Fibre Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-025-00620-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the toxic effects of three different titanium dioxide nanoparticles encoded in the European nanomaterial repository as NM-103 (rutile, hydrophobic), NM-104 (rutile, hydrophilic), and NM-105 (anatase/rutile, hydrophilic), suggesting different toxic potentials after uptake in the lungs. Wistar rats were exposed by nose-only inhalation to aerosol concentrations of 3, 12 and 48 mg/m3 for 4 weeks. This dosing scheme should induce non, partial and complete lung overload. The 4-week inhalation period was followed by 3-, 45- and 94-day exposure-free periods. Investigations according to the OECD 412 guideline were performed. Additional examinations, such as transmission electron microscopy and image analysis of tissue slides and cytospots, were performed to reveal possible differences among the three particle types.

Results: Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from the groups exposed to low concentrations of NM-103 or NM-104 presented slight inflammation. In the mid- and high-exposure groups, this was also present for the NM-105 group, however, weaker than those of NM-103 and NM-104. Histologically, all three groups presented similar distributions of particles in the respiratory tract. Although marginal differences in the degree of some changes exist, no obvious differences in the degree or characteristics of the induced lesions were observable. In general, compared with the higher exposure groups, all the middle exposure groups presented a greater accumulation and aggregation of macrophages at the terminal bronchi. Using transmission electron microscopy, particles were detected mainly in intraalveolar macrophages, followed by type 1 pneumocytes in the low- and mid-concentration groups and intraalveolar free particles in the high-concentration groups. Compared with the other groups, the NM-103 group presented greater numbers of free particles in the alveoli and fewer in the macrophages. With image analysis, the movement of particles to the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue and lymph nodes could be detected comparably for the three different particle types.

Conclusions: The no observed adverse effect concentration was 3 mg/m3 for all three different TiO2 particles. Despite minimal differences, a ranking mainly based on granulocyte influx into the lung was NM-104 > NM-103 > NM-105.

三种表面修饰二氧化钛纳米颗粒亚急性吸入后的毒性比较研究。
背景:本研究旨在比较欧洲纳米材料储存库中编码的三种不同二氧化钛纳米颗粒NM-103(金红石,疏水)、NM-104(金红石,亲水)和NM-105(锐钛矿/金红石,亲水)的毒性作用,提示肺部摄取后的毒性潜力不同。Wistar大鼠仅通过鼻腔吸入浓度为3、12和48 mg/m3的气溶胶,持续4周。这种给药方案应引起非、部分和完全肺负荷过重。4周的吸入期之后是3、45和94天的无暴露期。根据经合组织412指南进行了调查。其他检查,如透射电子显微镜和组织切片和细胞斑点的图像分析,进行了揭示三种颗粒类型之间可能的差异。结果:低浓度NM-103或NM-104组支气管肺泡灌洗液出现轻微炎症反应。在中等和高暴露组中,NM-105组也存在这种情况,但比NM-103和NM-104弱。组织学上,三组呼吸道颗粒分布相似。虽然某些变化的程度存在边际差异,但诱导病变的程度或特征没有明显差异。总的来说,与高暴露组相比,所有中等暴露组均表现出更大的末端支气管巨噬细胞的积累和聚集。透射电镜下,颗粒主要存在于肺泡内巨噬细胞中,其次是低、中浓度组的1型肺细胞,高浓度组的肺泡内自由颗粒。与其他各组相比,NM-103组肺泡内游离颗粒较多,巨噬细胞内游离颗粒较少。通过图像分析,可以比较地检测到三种不同颗粒类型的支气管相关淋巴组织和淋巴结的颗粒运动。结论:3种不同TiO2颗粒浓度均为3 mg/m3,未见不良反应。尽管差异很小,但主要基于粒细胞流入肺的排名是NM-104 b> NM-103 b> NM-105。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Particle and Fibre Toxicology is an online journal that is open access and peer-reviewed. It covers a range of disciplines such as material science, biomaterials, and nanomedicine, focusing on the toxicological effects of particles and fibres. The journal serves as a platform for scientific debate and communication among toxicologists and scientists from different fields who work with particle and fibre materials. The main objective of the journal is to deepen our understanding of the physico-chemical properties of particles, their potential for human exposure, and the resulting biological effects. It also addresses regulatory issues related to particle exposure in workplaces and the general environment. Moreover, the journal recognizes that there are various situations where particles can pose a toxicological threat, such as the use of old materials in new applications or the introduction of new materials altogether. By encompassing all these disciplines, Particle and Fibre Toxicology provides a comprehensive source for research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信