Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Long-COVID-Markers of Protection or Elevated Risk? A Systematic Review.

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 VIROLOGY
Sylvia Mink, Fabian Wilhelm, Janne Cadamuro, Patrick Reimann, Peter Fraunberger
{"title":"Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Long-COVID-Markers of Protection or Elevated Risk? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Sylvia Mink, Fabian Wilhelm, Janne Cadamuro, Patrick Reimann, Peter Fraunberger","doi":"10.1002/rmv.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-COVID affects a significant number of COVID-19 survivors, profoundly impacting daily life and work. Although research suggests a potential link between antibody levels and long-COVID risk, findings remain inconclusive. Understanding antibody dynamics could support the identification of patients at risk, improve long-COVID diagnosis, and guide protective strategies such as vaccination. Despite growing evidence, no systematic review has yet evaluated the current literature on this topic. We therefore aimed to synthesise and evaluate existing evidence on the association between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres and long-COVID, with the goal of clarifying their potential role in predicting long-COVID risk, guiding patient management, and informing future research directions. Studies published in PubMed/Medline databases between January 2020 and October 2024 were included without language restrictions. Studies on body fluids other than serum/blood were excluded. Study selection and quality assessment was conducted independently by two researchers. After screening 949 studies, 58 studies encompassing 53,739 individuals, and 7812 long-COVID patients, were included. Evidence was highly heterogenous but most studies reported an association between anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies and long-COVID, although the nature of the association appeared to be dependent on time from acute infection. Low anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies during acute COVID-19 were associated with increased risk of long-COVID. The association between low anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies during acute COVID-19 and long-COVID suggests that maintaining sufficiently high antibody levels may be protective. However, the current evidence level is low and further studies with sufficient power are required to confirm this association and to potentially determine protective cutoffs.</p>","PeriodicalId":21180,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Medical Virology","volume":"35 2","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Medical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.70027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-COVID affects a significant number of COVID-19 survivors, profoundly impacting daily life and work. Although research suggests a potential link between antibody levels and long-COVID risk, findings remain inconclusive. Understanding antibody dynamics could support the identification of patients at risk, improve long-COVID diagnosis, and guide protective strategies such as vaccination. Despite growing evidence, no systematic review has yet evaluated the current literature on this topic. We therefore aimed to synthesise and evaluate existing evidence on the association between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titres and long-COVID, with the goal of clarifying their potential role in predicting long-COVID risk, guiding patient management, and informing future research directions. Studies published in PubMed/Medline databases between January 2020 and October 2024 were included without language restrictions. Studies on body fluids other than serum/blood were excluded. Study selection and quality assessment was conducted independently by two researchers. After screening 949 studies, 58 studies encompassing 53,739 individuals, and 7812 long-COVID patients, were included. Evidence was highly heterogenous but most studies reported an association between anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies and long-COVID, although the nature of the association appeared to be dependent on time from acute infection. Low anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies during acute COVID-19 were associated with increased risk of long-COVID. The association between low anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike antibodies during acute COVID-19 and long-COVID suggests that maintaining sufficiently high antibody levels may be protective. However, the current evidence level is low and further studies with sufficient power are required to confirm this association and to potentially determine protective cutoffs.

抗sars - cov -2抗体是长冠状病毒保护标志物还是高风险标志物?系统评价。
长期covid影响了大量COVID-19幸存者,深刻影响了日常生活和工作。尽管研究表明抗体水平与长期covid风险之间存在潜在联系,但研究结果仍不确定。了解抗体动态可以帮助识别有风险的患者,改善长期covid诊断,并指导疫苗接种等保护策略。尽管有越来越多的证据,但目前还没有对这一主题的文献进行系统评价。因此,我们旨在综合和评估抗sars - cov -2抗体滴度与长冠状病毒之间关联的现有证据,目的是阐明其在预测长冠状病毒风险、指导患者管理和为未来的研究方向提供信息方面的潜在作用。2020年1月至2024年10月期间发表在PubMed/Medline数据库中的研究没有语言限制。排除了血清/血液以外的体液研究。研究选择和质量评估由两名研究人员独立进行。在筛选了949项研究后,纳入了58项研究,包括53739名个体和7812名长期covid患者。证据是高度异质性的,但大多数研究报告了抗sars - cov -2刺突抗体与长covid之间的关联,尽管这种关联的性质似乎取决于急性感染的时间。急性COVID-19期间抗sars - cov -2刺突抗体水平低与长期COVID-19风险增加相关。急性COVID-19期间低抗sars - cov -2刺突抗体与长期covid之间的关联表明,维持足够高的抗体水平可能具有保护作用。然而,目前的证据水平很低,需要进一步的研究来证实这种关联,并确定潜在的保护截止点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in Medical Virology
Reviews in Medical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.90%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Reviews in Medical Virology aims to provide articles reviewing conceptual or technological advances in diverse areas of virology. The journal covers topics such as molecular biology, cell biology, replication, pathogenesis, immunology, immunization, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment of viruses of medical importance, and COVID-19 research. The journal has an Impact Factor of 6.989 for the year 2020. The readership of the journal includes clinicians, virologists, medical microbiologists, molecular biologists, infectious disease specialists, and immunologists. Reviews in Medical Virology is indexed and abstracted in databases such as CABI, Abstracts in Anthropology, ProQuest, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, ProQuest Central K-494, SCOPUS, and Web of Science et,al.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信