Emmanuel Giannas, Brandon Alba, Kelly A Harmon, Annie Fritsch, David Kurlander, Deana Shenaq, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Chris Reid, Evan Matros, Babak Mehrara, George Kokosis
{"title":"The Co-Surgeon model for Microsurgical Free Flaps: A Survey of Perspectives and Utility.","authors":"Emmanuel Giannas, Brandon Alba, Kelly A Harmon, Annie Fritsch, David Kurlander, Deana Shenaq, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Chris Reid, Evan Matros, Babak Mehrara, George Kokosis","doi":"10.1055/a-2540-0835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reconstructive microsurgery remains a demanding field, requiring technical expertise and long operating hours. This places microsurgeons at increased risk of dissatisfaction and burnout. The co-surgeon model has been developed to mitigate these challenges. This study was designed to evaluate microsurgeon perspectives on the characteristics and impact of the co-surgeon model for microsurgical free flaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic anonymous survey was distributed via email to attending microsurgeon members of the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgeons. The survey collected various demographic and practice-related information including Likert scale questions to assess microsurgeons perspectives on the utility of the co-surgeon model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 862 microsurgeons received the survey, with 102 responses available for analysis. The average age of respondents was 46.6 (±9.7) years. Most of the microsurgeons were male (71%) practicing in the US (93%), with 74.5% of respondents utilizing a co-surgeon model in their practice. Bilateral breast flaps were the most common microsurgical procedure performed using a co-surgeon (85%), followed by head and neck free flaps (60%), with Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction being the least common (3.1%). On the day of the co-surgery case, the co-surgeon was more likely than the primary surgeon to have additional cases (68.4% and 36.4% respectively), with the additional cases being rarely free flaps. More than 80% of microsurgeons stated that the co-surgeon model improves \"very much\" or \"quite a bit\" operative efficiency and duration, as well as surgeon wellbeing and career longevity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides new insight on the utility of using a co-surgeon for free flap reconstruction by demonstrating that approximately 80% of microsurgeons have a positive perception of the model's impact on procedure efficiency, operative time, surgeon wellbeing, and career longevity. Therefore, adopting a co-surgeon model for microsurgical free flap reconstruction may be useful in reducing burnout and promoting wellbeing among microsurgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2540-0835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Reconstructive microsurgery remains a demanding field, requiring technical expertise and long operating hours. This places microsurgeons at increased risk of dissatisfaction and burnout. The co-surgeon model has been developed to mitigate these challenges. This study was designed to evaluate microsurgeon perspectives on the characteristics and impact of the co-surgeon model for microsurgical free flaps.
Methods: An electronic anonymous survey was distributed via email to attending microsurgeon members of the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgeons. The survey collected various demographic and practice-related information including Likert scale questions to assess microsurgeons perspectives on the utility of the co-surgeon model.
Results: A total of 862 microsurgeons received the survey, with 102 responses available for analysis. The average age of respondents was 46.6 (±9.7) years. Most of the microsurgeons were male (71%) practicing in the US (93%), with 74.5% of respondents utilizing a co-surgeon model in their practice. Bilateral breast flaps were the most common microsurgical procedure performed using a co-surgeon (85%), followed by head and neck free flaps (60%), with Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction being the least common (3.1%). On the day of the co-surgery case, the co-surgeon was more likely than the primary surgeon to have additional cases (68.4% and 36.4% respectively), with the additional cases being rarely free flaps. More than 80% of microsurgeons stated that the co-surgeon model improves "very much" or "quite a bit" operative efficiency and duration, as well as surgeon wellbeing and career longevity.
Conclusion: This study provides new insight on the utility of using a co-surgeon for free flap reconstruction by demonstrating that approximately 80% of microsurgeons have a positive perception of the model's impact on procedure efficiency, operative time, surgeon wellbeing, and career longevity. Therefore, adopting a co-surgeon model for microsurgical free flap reconstruction may be useful in reducing burnout and promoting wellbeing among microsurgeons.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.