Dupilumab Effectiveness in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma Non-Responsive to Omalizumab.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Diego Bagnasco, Benedetta Bondi, Luisa Brussino, Stefania Nicola, Paolo Cameli, Angelica Tiotiu, Giuseppe Guida, Chiara Gollinucci, Dina Visca, Antonio Spanevello, Laura Pini, Marco Caminati, Gianenrico Senna, Cristiano Caruso, Rikki Frank Canevari, Melania Bertolini, Sara Fedele, Marcello Mincarini, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Fulvio Braido, On Behalf Of The Sani Group
{"title":"Dupilumab Effectiveness in Patients with Severe Allergic Asthma Non-Responsive to Omalizumab.","authors":"Diego Bagnasco, Benedetta Bondi, Luisa Brussino, Stefania Nicola, Paolo Cameli, Angelica Tiotiu, Giuseppe Guida, Chiara Gollinucci, Dina Visca, Antonio Spanevello, Laura Pini, Marco Caminati, Gianenrico Senna, Cristiano Caruso, Rikki Frank Canevari, Melania Bertolini, Sara Fedele, Marcello Mincarini, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Fulvio Braido, On Behalf Of The Sani Group","doi":"10.3390/jpm15020043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Severe allergic asthma is usually treated with omalizumab; however, this drug may not be effective for every patient. By its action, dupilumab could be an alternative in these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with severe allergic asthma, non-responsive to omalizumab, according to the maintenance of their oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, an exacerbation rate decrease, or poor control of the disease, despite optimized treatment. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective analysis of data from severe asthma clinics was performed, observing the efficacy of the switch to dupilumab in patients who experienced a failed treatment with omalizumab. <b>Results</b>: Forty-two patients were included. Dupilumab proved to be effective in patients who experienced a failed omalizumab treatment, with a significant reduction in the exacerbation number and OCS use. Furthermore, remission of the disease, according to the Severe Asthma Network of Italy (SANI) criteria, was achieved in 35 patients, with complete remission in 19 (45%) and partial remission in 16 (38%). The analysis of the predictors of the success of dupilumab therapy in achieving clinical remission, through univariate analysis of the data at baseline, showed that complete remission was more easily reached in patients with concomitant aspirin (ASA) intolerance or in those with nasal polyposis. <b>Conclusions</b>: Dupilumab is an effective drug for the treatment of patients with severe asthma with an allergic component, with better benefits in patients with an ASA intolerance or nasal polyposis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15020043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Severe allergic asthma is usually treated with omalizumab; however, this drug may not be effective for every patient. By its action, dupilumab could be an alternative in these patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of dupilumab in patients with severe allergic asthma, non-responsive to omalizumab, according to the maintenance of their oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, an exacerbation rate decrease, or poor control of the disease, despite optimized treatment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from severe asthma clinics was performed, observing the efficacy of the switch to dupilumab in patients who experienced a failed treatment with omalizumab. Results: Forty-two patients were included. Dupilumab proved to be effective in patients who experienced a failed omalizumab treatment, with a significant reduction in the exacerbation number and OCS use. Furthermore, remission of the disease, according to the Severe Asthma Network of Italy (SANI) criteria, was achieved in 35 patients, with complete remission in 19 (45%) and partial remission in 16 (38%). The analysis of the predictors of the success of dupilumab therapy in achieving clinical remission, through univariate analysis of the data at baseline, showed that complete remission was more easily reached in patients with concomitant aspirin (ASA) intolerance or in those with nasal polyposis. Conclusions: Dupilumab is an effective drug for the treatment of patients with severe asthma with an allergic component, with better benefits in patients with an ASA intolerance or nasal polyposis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信