Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alice J M Jelmoni, Ghada Albuainain, Gianfranco Gaudiano, Gianluca Sorrento, David F Tang-Wai, Alfonso Fasano
{"title":"Familial vs sporadic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a comparative study.","authors":"Alice J M Jelmoni, Ghada Albuainain, Gianfranco Gaudiano, Gianluca Sorrento, David F Tang-Wai, Alfonso Fasano","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-12970-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome characterized by the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that results in the clinic triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH can be categorized as secondary, idiopathic, or familial. Here, we report a comparison of sporadic to familial types from clinical, radiological, and surgery response aspects as well as a novel gene mutation as a cause of familial NPH.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We analyzed 139 patients evaluated for NPH at our center from 2010 to 2022. Ninety-five patients diagnosed with probable (n = 26) or definite (n = 69) iNPH were included. Clinical, radiological, and gait data were retrospectively collected. In patients with a positive familial history of NPH, we defined the inheritance pattern when possible. The results of performed genetic tests were reported.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Nine patients (9.5%) had a familial history of NPH. Familial and sporadic groups were largely comparable in age, sex, and disease duration. However, familial cases had better cognitive scores (p = 0.022) and a higher prevalence of upper-limb action tremor (56% vs. 14%; p = 0.008). No significant differences were noted in radiological markers, and both groups showed a positive response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel pathogenic NEIL1 variant in twin patients with familial NPH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Familial NPH occurred in roughly 1 in 10 reviewed iNPH cases and demonstrates better cognition and increased tremor incidence compared to sporadic cases but otherwise similar characteristics. The genetic underpinning of these cases is heterogeneous and NEIL1 might represent another associated gene.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 3","pages":"229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-12970-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) is a syndrome characterized by the buildup of cerebrospinal fluid that results in the clinic triad of gait impairment, urinary incontinence, and cognitive impairment. NPH can be categorized as secondary, idiopathic, or familial. Here, we report a comparison of sporadic to familial types from clinical, radiological, and surgery response aspects as well as a novel gene mutation as a cause of familial NPH.

Method: We analyzed 139 patients evaluated for NPH at our center from 2010 to 2022. Ninety-five patients diagnosed with probable (n = 26) or definite (n = 69) iNPH were included. Clinical, radiological, and gait data were retrospectively collected. In patients with a positive familial history of NPH, we defined the inheritance pattern when possible. The results of performed genetic tests were reported.

Result: Nine patients (9.5%) had a familial history of NPH. Familial and sporadic groups were largely comparable in age, sex, and disease duration. However, familial cases had better cognitive scores (p = 0.022) and a higher prevalence of upper-limb action tremor (56% vs. 14%; p = 0.008). No significant differences were noted in radiological markers, and both groups showed a positive response to ventriculoperitoneal shunting (VPS). Whole exome sequencing identified a novel pathogenic NEIL1 variant in twin patients with familial NPH.

Conclusions: Familial NPH occurred in roughly 1 in 10 reviewed iNPH cases and demonstrates better cognition and increased tremor incidence compared to sporadic cases but otherwise similar characteristics. The genetic underpinning of these cases is heterogeneous and NEIL1 might represent another associated gene.

家族性与散发性常压脑积水的比较研究。
导读:常压脑积水(NPH)是一种以脑脊液积聚为特征的综合征,其临床表现为步态障碍、尿失禁和认知障碍。NPH可分为继发性、特发性和家族性。在这里,我们报告了从临床、放射学和手术反应方面对散发性和家族性NPH的比较,以及一种新的基因突变作为家族性NPH的原因。方法:我们分析了2010年至2022年在我们中心评估的139例NPH患者。95例诊断为可能(n = 26)或明确(n = 69) iNPH的患者被纳入研究。回顾性收集临床、放射学和步态资料。在有NPH阳性家族史的患者中,我们尽可能确定遗传模式。报告了已进行的基因检测的结果。结果:9例(9.5%)患者有NPH家族史。家族性组和散发性组在年龄、性别和病程上基本相似。然而,家族性病例有更好的认知评分(p = 0.022)和更高的上肢震颤患病率(56% vs. 14%;p = 0.008)。放射学指标无显著差异,两组对脑室-腹膜分流(VPS)均有阳性反应。全外显子组测序在双胞胎家族性NPH患者中发现了一种新的致病性NEIL1变异。结论:家族性NPH发生在大约1 / 10的iNPH病例中,与散发性病例相比,家族性NPH表现出更好的认知能力和增加的震颤发生率,但其他特征相似。这些病例的遗传基础是异质的,NEIL1可能代表另一个相关基因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信