Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Cognitive Outcomes in Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond: A Systematic Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Paola Pastena, Gabriele Campagnoli, Ali Reza Rahmani, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos
{"title":"Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Cognitive Outcomes in Cardiovascular Disease and Beyond: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Paola Pastena, Gabriele Campagnoli, Ali Reza Rahmani, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos","doi":"10.3390/jpm15020057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Cognitive impairment is a debilitating comorbidity affecting diverse patient populations, yet the cognitive effects of therapies like mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) remain underexplored. Preclinical evidence suggests that MRAs, particularly spironolactone, may reduce cognitive decline by modulating aldosterone-dependent pathways and targeting hippocampal receptors. However, evidence in humans is fragmented, and no systematic review has consolidated these findings. This review evaluates the cognitive effects of MRAs, synthesizes current data, and identifies research gaps. <b>Methods:</b> A literature search using terms related to MRAs and cognitive outcomes was performed in PubMed and Web of Science from 1979 to 2023. A total of 143 articles were identified and 85 were screened after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 44 studies were included and were classified based on study design and population focus (preclinical, healthy controls, patients with psychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular patients). <b>Results:</b> Spironolactone demonstrated mixed effects on cognition. In healthy participants, it improved spatial memory under stress and prevented stress-related suppression of medial temporal activity, but impaired working memory and selective attention. In patients with psychiatric conditions, spironolactone reduced cognitive empathy deficits in major depressive disorder and improved working memory in bipolar I disorder. In cardiovascular patients, spironolactone improved cognitive scores and hippocampal memory but had no effect on non-hippocampal memory. <b>Conclusions:</b> Spironolactone exhibits potential cognitive benefits across diverse populations. However, its effects on cognition are mixed, highlighting the need for further research to understand its mechanisms and therapeutic potential, particularly in patients with heart failure and other related conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16722,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personalized Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15020057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Cognitive impairment is a debilitating comorbidity affecting diverse patient populations, yet the cognitive effects of therapies like mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) remain underexplored. Preclinical evidence suggests that MRAs, particularly spironolactone, may reduce cognitive decline by modulating aldosterone-dependent pathways and targeting hippocampal receptors. However, evidence in humans is fragmented, and no systematic review has consolidated these findings. This review evaluates the cognitive effects of MRAs, synthesizes current data, and identifies research gaps. Methods: A literature search using terms related to MRAs and cognitive outcomes was performed in PubMed and Web of Science from 1979 to 2023. A total of 143 articles were identified and 85 were screened after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 44 studies were included and were classified based on study design and population focus (preclinical, healthy controls, patients with psychiatric disorders, and cardiovascular patients). Results: Spironolactone demonstrated mixed effects on cognition. In healthy participants, it improved spatial memory under stress and prevented stress-related suppression of medial temporal activity, but impaired working memory and selective attention. In patients with psychiatric conditions, spironolactone reduced cognitive empathy deficits in major depressive disorder and improved working memory in bipolar I disorder. In cardiovascular patients, spironolactone improved cognitive scores and hippocampal memory but had no effect on non-hippocampal memory. Conclusions: Spironolactone exhibits potential cognitive benefits across diverse populations. However, its effects on cognition are mixed, highlighting the need for further research to understand its mechanisms and therapeutic potential, particularly in patients with heart failure and other related conditions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Journal of Personalized Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1878
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Personalized Medicine (JPM; ISSN 2075-4426) is an international, open access journal aimed at bringing all aspects of personalized medicine to one platform. JPM publishes cutting edge, innovative preclinical and translational scientific research and technologies related to personalized medicine (e.g., pharmacogenomics/proteomics, systems biology). JPM recognizes that personalized medicine—the assessment of genetic, environmental and host factors that cause variability of individuals—is a challenging, transdisciplinary topic that requires discussions from a range of experts. For a comprehensive perspective of personalized medicine, JPM aims to integrate expertise from the molecular and translational sciences, therapeutics and diagnostics, as well as discussions of regulatory, social, ethical and policy aspects. We provide a forum to bring together academic and clinical researchers, biotechnology, diagnostic and pharmaceutical companies, health professionals, regulatory and ethical experts, and government and regulatory authorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信