Effect of self-hypnosis on fear and pain of natural childbirth: a randomized controlled trial.

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.1515/jcim-2024-0353
Batool Kamalimanesh, Maryam Moradi, Mehdi Fathi, Maliheh Afiat, Mahnaz Boroumand Rezazadeh, Mohammad Taghi Shakeri
{"title":"Effect of self-hypnosis on fear and pain of natural childbirth: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Batool Kamalimanesh, Maryam Moradi, Mehdi Fathi, Maliheh Afiat, Mahnaz Boroumand Rezazadeh, Mohammad Taghi Shakeri","doi":"10.1515/jcim-2024-0353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A clinical trial was conducted to address the trend of high cesarean section rates resulting from maternal fear of childbirth. This trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of self-hypnosis in mitigating fear and pain during childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a parallel, not blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in 2019 in Mashhad, Iran. Ninety-three nulliparous women were selected by convenience sampling and randomized by random allocation software (4 blocking groups) to either self-hypnosis or control groups. During the clinical trial, both groups received usual care for pregnancy and childbirth. However, the self-hypnosis group also participated in two hypnosis sessions and was given two audio files to practice self-hypnosis at home until delivery. The follow-up period ranged from the 37th week of pregnancy to the postpartum period. Fear of childbirth was assessed at 39 weeks and at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm, while labor pain was measured at the same stage of labor as the primary outcomes between two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16, applying the Independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty women in the self-hypnosis group, aged 24.96±5.42, and 33 women in the control group, aged 23.63±4.68, completed the study. The average scores of fear of childbirth during pregnancy at 39 weeks (self-hypnosis: 46.46±14.53, control: 73.18±17.91), during the active phase of labor at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm (self-hypnosis: 40.80±17.37, control: 75.12±19.40), and labor pain at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm (self-hypnosis: 83.03±16.43, control: 95.36±10.36) were significantly lower in the self-hypnosis group compared to the control group (p<0.001 for all).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that self-hypnosis could be a more effective intervention than usual care alone for reducing fear and pain during natural childbirth in nulliparous women.</p>","PeriodicalId":15556,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"353-362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2024-0353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A clinical trial was conducted to address the trend of high cesarean section rates resulting from maternal fear of childbirth. This trial aimed to investigate the effectiveness of self-hypnosis in mitigating fear and pain during childbirth.

Methods: This study was a parallel, not blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted in 2019 in Mashhad, Iran. Ninety-three nulliparous women were selected by convenience sampling and randomized by random allocation software (4 blocking groups) to either self-hypnosis or control groups. During the clinical trial, both groups received usual care for pregnancy and childbirth. However, the self-hypnosis group also participated in two hypnosis sessions and was given two audio files to practice self-hypnosis at home until delivery. The follow-up period ranged from the 37th week of pregnancy to the postpartum period. Fear of childbirth was assessed at 39 weeks and at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm, while labor pain was measured at the same stage of labor as the primary outcomes between two groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16, applying the Independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Thirty women in the self-hypnosis group, aged 24.96±5.42, and 33 women in the control group, aged 23.63±4.68, completed the study. The average scores of fear of childbirth during pregnancy at 39 weeks (self-hypnosis: 46.46±14.53, control: 73.18±17.91), during the active phase of labor at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm (self-hypnosis: 40.80±17.37, control: 75.12±19.40), and labor pain at cervical dilatation of 8-10 cm (self-hypnosis: 83.03±16.43, control: 95.36±10.36) were significantly lower in the self-hypnosis group compared to the control group (p<0.001 for all).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that self-hypnosis could be a more effective intervention than usual care alone for reducing fear and pain during natural childbirth in nulliparous women.

自我催眠对自然分娩恐惧和疼痛的影响:随机对照试验。
目的:进行一项临床试验,以解决因产妇害怕分娩而导致的剖宫产率高的趋势。本试验旨在探讨自我催眠在减轻分娩时恐惧和疼痛的有效性。方法:本研究是一项平行、非盲、随机对照试验,于2019年在伊朗马什哈德进行。采用方便抽样的方法,将93例未生育妇女随机分为自我催眠组和对照组。在临床试验期间,两组都接受了妊娠和分娩的常规护理。然而,自我催眠组也参加了两次催眠课程,并获得了两个音频文件,在家中练习自我催眠,直到分娩。随访时间为妊娠第37周至产后。分娩恐惧在39 周和宫颈扩张8-10 cm时进行评估,而分娩疼痛在分娩的同一阶段作为两组之间的主要结局进行测量。数据采用SPSS 16进行分析,采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:自我催眠组30例,年龄24.96±5.42;对照组33例,年龄23.63±4.68。妊娠39 周(自我催眠:46.46±14.53,对照组:73.18±17.91)、产程活跃期宫颈扩张8 ~ 10 cm(自我催眠:40.80±17.37,对照组:75.12±19.40)、产程疼痛8 ~ 10 cm(自我催眠:83.03±16.43,对照组:95.36±10.36)的平均得分均显著低于对照组(p结论:我们的研究结果表明,自我催眠可能是一种比常规护理更有效的干预措施,可以减少未生育妇女自然分娩时的恐惧和疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine
Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Journal of Complementary and Integrative Medicine (JCIM) focuses on evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of complementary medical (CM) whole systems, practices, interventions and natural health products, including herbal and traditional medicines. The journal is edited by Ed Lui of the University of Western Ontario. Topics: -Quality, efficacy, and safety of natural health products, dietary supplements, traditional medicines and their synthetic duplicates -Efficacy and safety of complementary therapies -Evidence-based medicine and practice, including evidence of traditional use -Curriculum development, educational system and competency of complementary health programs -Methodologies on research and evaluation of traditional medicines and herbal products -Integrative medicine: basic and clinical research and practice -Innovation in CAM Curriculum -Educational Material Design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信