Skin of Colour Education Initiatives Among Dermatology Residents: A Narrative Review.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Serena Dienes, Darshana Seeburruth, Ye-Jean Park, Muskaan Sachdeva, Marissa Joseph, Sameh Hanna
{"title":"Skin of Colour Education Initiatives Among Dermatology Residents: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Serena Dienes, Darshana Seeburruth, Ye-Jean Park, Muskaan Sachdeva, Marissa Joseph, Sameh Hanna","doi":"10.1177/12034754251322882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achieving comprehensive education in skin of colour (SoC) dermatology presents a multifaceted challenge for dermatology trainees. Exposure to diverse skin tones in didactic curricula and clinical encounters varies greatly based on geographic location and institution and, as a whole, remains disparate. While SoC education initiatives for medical students and residents have increased in recent years, the characteristics and outcomes of initiatives specifically tailored to dermatology residents have not been summarized.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Outline the demographic features of participants; (2) summarize intervention characteristics and the metrics by which educational impact was defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched for SoC education interventions aimed at dermatology trainees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies were selected for inclusion. Two hundred thirty-seven dermatology residents participated from institutions across the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Botswana. Most interventions were didactics based, assessed changes in subjective confidence, and employed identical pre- and posttest questions. Confidence increased for didactic-only interventions, decreased with multimodal interventions, and was incongruent with objective knowledge or diagnostic scores. Single-format interventions or assessments with identical pre- and posttest questions may provide an inflated sense of confidence through recall bias or other heuristics. Conversely, the cognitive synthesis afforded by multimodal interventions or new (but equivalent) assessment questions may lead to low confidence ratings despite improved knowledge scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>When designing SoC learning initiatives in postgraduate dermatology education, multimodal formats, and paired objective and subjective assessments that employ both identical and different pre- and post-intervention questions may give a more relevant and accurate reflection of impact in clinical practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15403,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"12034754251322882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12034754251322882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Achieving comprehensive education in skin of colour (SoC) dermatology presents a multifaceted challenge for dermatology trainees. Exposure to diverse skin tones in didactic curricula and clinical encounters varies greatly based on geographic location and institution and, as a whole, remains disparate. While SoC education initiatives for medical students and residents have increased in recent years, the characteristics and outcomes of initiatives specifically tailored to dermatology residents have not been summarized.

Objectives: (1) Outline the demographic features of participants; (2) summarize intervention characteristics and the metrics by which educational impact was defined.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed were searched for SoC education interventions aimed at dermatology trainees.

Results: Five studies were selected for inclusion. Two hundred thirty-seven dermatology residents participated from institutions across the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, and Botswana. Most interventions were didactics based, assessed changes in subjective confidence, and employed identical pre- and posttest questions. Confidence increased for didactic-only interventions, decreased with multimodal interventions, and was incongruent with objective knowledge or diagnostic scores. Single-format interventions or assessments with identical pre- and posttest questions may provide an inflated sense of confidence through recall bias or other heuristics. Conversely, the cognitive synthesis afforded by multimodal interventions or new (but equivalent) assessment questions may lead to low confidence ratings despite improved knowledge scores.

Conclusions: When designing SoC learning initiatives in postgraduate dermatology education, multimodal formats, and paired objective and subjective assessments that employ both identical and different pre- and post-intervention questions may give a more relevant and accurate reflection of impact in clinical practice settings.

皮肤科住院医师的肤色教育倡议:叙述回顾。
背景:实现肤色皮肤(SoC)皮肤科的全面教育对皮肤科学员提出了多方面的挑战。在教学课程和临床接触中,不同肤色的接触因地理位置和机构的不同而有很大差异,整体上仍然是不同的。虽然近年来针对医学生和住院医生的SoC教育计划有所增加,但专门针对皮肤科住院医生的计划的特点和结果尚未得到总结。目标:(1)概述参与者的人口特征;(2)总结干预的特征和定义教育影响的指标。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase和PubMed中针对皮肤科实习生的SoC教育干预措施。结果:5项研究入选。来自美国、英国、澳大利亚和博茨瓦纳各机构的237名皮肤科住院医生参与了这项研究。大多数干预是以教学为基础的,评估主观信心的变化,并采用相同的测试前和测试后问题。单纯说教式干预增加了信心,多模式干预降低了信心,并且与客观知识或诊断评分不一致。单一形式的干预或评估与相同的前测试和后测试问题可能提供一个膨胀的信心通过回忆偏差或其他启发式。相反,由多模态干预或新的(但等效的)评估问题提供的认知综合可能导致低信心评级,尽管提高了知识得分。结论:在皮肤病学研究生教育中设计SoC学习计划时,采用多模式形式和采用相同和不同干预前和干预后问题的配对客观和主观评估可能会更相关和准确地反映临床实践环境的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (JCMS) aims to reflect the state of the art in cutaneous biology and dermatology by providing original scientific writings, as well as a complete critical review of the dermatology literature for clinicians, trainees, and academicians. JCMS endeavours to bring readers cutting edge dermatologic information in two distinct formats. Part of each issue features scholarly research and articles on issues of basic and applied science, insightful case reports, comprehensive continuing medical education, and in depth reviews, all of which provide theoretical framework for practitioners to make sound practical decisions. The evolving field of dermatology is highlighted through these articles. In addition, part of each issue is dedicated to making the most important developments in dermatology easily accessible to the clinician by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information in a format that is interesting, clearly presented, and useful to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信