Predicted Heart Mass and Outcomes in the Contemporary Era of Heart Transplantation: Insights from the Dallas Heart Study.

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ersilia M Defilippis, Lauren K Truby, Sonia Garg, Elaine Wu, Hadi Beaini, Matthias Peltz, Mark H Drazner, Natalie Bello, Maryjane A Farr
{"title":"Predicted Heart Mass and Outcomes in the Contemporary Era of Heart Transplantation: Insights from the Dallas Heart Study.","authors":"Ersilia M Defilippis, Lauren K Truby, Sonia Garg, Elaine Wu, Hadi Beaini, Matthias Peltz, Mark H Drazner, Natalie Bello, Maryjane A Farr","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Donor-recipient size matching is a key factor in donor selection for heart transplantation (HT). One approach uses predicted heart mass (PHM), derived from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We sought to examine whether predicted left ventricular mass (PLVM) derived from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS) is associated with post-transplant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study cohort included participants without pre-existing cardiac disease in the DHS who had cardiac MRIs (n = 1746). A PLVM model was derived by linear regression. The DHS PLVM and MESA PHM were tested for correlation. The associations of the DHS PLVM and the MESA PHM with 1-year mortality post-HT were assessed in the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry in 3 eras: era 1: 1/1/2011-12/31/2014; era 2: 1/1/2015-10/17/2018; and era 3: 10/18/2018-12/31/2021). A pre-specified threshold for low donor-to-recipient mass ratio (< 0.86) was used in Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DHS cohort had a median age of 43 (IQR 36-52) years, 49% male, 40% Black, and 18% Hispanic ethnicity. The DHS PLVM was highly correlated with the MESA PHM: r = 0.96; P < 0.001. In era 1, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio according to the DHS PLVM was associated with increased 1-year mortality rates (log-rank P < 0.001) as was the MESA PHM (log rank P = 0.002). However, in eras 2 and 3, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio by either the DHS PLVM or MESA PHM was not associated with increased 1-year mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PLVM was highly correlated with PHM. A low donor-to-recipient mass ratio, whether assessed by PLVM or PHM, was associated with 1-year mortality post-HT in a historical era but not in the current era under the new allocation system. These findings suggest that other factors may be contributing to donor selection and mortality risk in the modern era.</p>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.01.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Donor-recipient size matching is a key factor in donor selection for heart transplantation (HT). One approach uses predicted heart mass (PHM), derived from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We sought to examine whether predicted left ventricular mass (PLVM) derived from the Dallas Heart Study (DHS) is associated with post-transplant outcomes.

Methods: The study cohort included participants without pre-existing cardiac disease in the DHS who had cardiac MRIs (n = 1746). A PLVM model was derived by linear regression. The DHS PLVM and MESA PHM were tested for correlation. The associations of the DHS PLVM and the MESA PHM with 1-year mortality post-HT were assessed in the United Network for Organ Sharing Registry in 3 eras: era 1: 1/1/2011-12/31/2014; era 2: 1/1/2015-10/17/2018; and era 3: 10/18/2018-12/31/2021). A pre-specified threshold for low donor-to-recipient mass ratio (< 0.86) was used in Kaplan-Meier survival estimation and univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models.

Results: The DHS cohort had a median age of 43 (IQR 36-52) years, 49% male, 40% Black, and 18% Hispanic ethnicity. The DHS PLVM was highly correlated with the MESA PHM: r = 0.96; P < 0.001. In era 1, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio according to the DHS PLVM was associated with increased 1-year mortality rates (log-rank P < 0.001) as was the MESA PHM (log rank P = 0.002). However, in eras 2 and 3, a low donor-to-recipient mass ratio by either the DHS PLVM or MESA PHM was not associated with increased 1-year mortality rates.

Conclusion: PLVM was highly correlated with PHM. A low donor-to-recipient mass ratio, whether assessed by PLVM or PHM, was associated with 1-year mortality post-HT in a historical era but not in the current era under the new allocation system. These findings suggest that other factors may be contributing to donor selection and mortality risk in the modern era.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信