In Silico Interim Adaptation of Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer by Simultaneous Dose and Linear Energy Transfer Escalation.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Guillermo Garrido-Hernandez, Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge, René M Winter, Signe Danielsen, Mirjam K D Alsaker, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Helge Henjum
{"title":"In Silico Interim Adaptation of Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer by Simultaneous Dose and Linear Energy Transfer Escalation.","authors":"Guillermo Garrido-Hernandez, Kristian Smeland Ytre-Hauge, René M Winter, Signe Danielsen, Mirjam K D Alsaker, Kathrine Røe Redalen, Helge Henjum","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The outcome of proton therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) varies considerably. We investigated the feasibility of adapting proton therapy plans based on <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-defined biologic tumor volumes (BTVs) reflecting remaining aggressive tumor subvolumes 2 weeks into treatment (interim). Recognizing the potential to improve proton therapy response with increasing linear energy transfer (LET), we simulated a combined dose-LET escalation to the BTVs and compared it to pure dose escalation. In addition, the impact of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was evaluated by comparing the constant RBE of 1.1 (RBE<sub>1.1</sub>) with a variable-RBE model.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>A semiautomated method was used to segment the BTV from <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-defined for 9 patients with HNC, assuming high standardized uptake value at interim to reflect tumor radioresistance. An in-house Monte Carlo-based recalculation and reoptimization tool simulated proton therapy plans with both constant RBE<sub>1.1</sub> and variable-RBE, aimed to deliver 68 Gy (RBE) to high-risk target volumes, 10% dose escalation to the BTV, and a LET boost to the BTV. Dose distributions were prioritized over LET optimization goals. Results were quantified by dose and LET distributions to target volumes and organs at risk, as well as normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for xerostomia and dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dose-LET adapted proton therapy plans achieved 10% dose escalation and mean dose-averaged LET (LET<sub>d</sub>) increases to the BTV above 1.0 keV/μm, with no significant LET increases to organs at risk. NTCP for xerostomia and dysphagia from dose-LET and dose-only escalation were similar. However, NTCPs increased 6% to 10% when variable-RBE was used instead of the constant RBE<sub>1.1</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our in silico study showed that dose-LET escalation in proton therapy integrating a variable-RBE model may improve proton therapy for patients with HNC. Clinical evaluation of such a biological image-based dose-LET escalation in proton therapy of HNC remains to be investigated.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The outcome of proton therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) varies considerably. We investigated the feasibility of adapting proton therapy plans based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-defined biologic tumor volumes (BTVs) reflecting remaining aggressive tumor subvolumes 2 weeks into treatment (interim). Recognizing the potential to improve proton therapy response with increasing linear energy transfer (LET), we simulated a combined dose-LET escalation to the BTVs and compared it to pure dose escalation. In addition, the impact of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was evaluated by comparing the constant RBE of 1.1 (RBE1.1) with a variable-RBE model.

Methods and materials: A semiautomated method was used to segment the BTV from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-defined for 9 patients with HNC, assuming high standardized uptake value at interim to reflect tumor radioresistance. An in-house Monte Carlo-based recalculation and reoptimization tool simulated proton therapy plans with both constant RBE1.1 and variable-RBE, aimed to deliver 68 Gy (RBE) to high-risk target volumes, 10% dose escalation to the BTV, and a LET boost to the BTV. Dose distributions were prioritized over LET optimization goals. Results were quantified by dose and LET distributions to target volumes and organs at risk, as well as normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) for xerostomia and dysphagia.

Results: Dose-LET adapted proton therapy plans achieved 10% dose escalation and mean dose-averaged LET (LETd) increases to the BTV above 1.0 keV/μm, with no significant LET increases to organs at risk. NTCP for xerostomia and dysphagia from dose-LET and dose-only escalation were similar. However, NTCPs increased 6% to 10% when variable-RBE was used instead of the constant RBE1.1.

Conclusions: Our in silico study showed that dose-LET escalation in proton therapy integrating a variable-RBE model may improve proton therapy for patients with HNC. Clinical evaluation of such a biological image-based dose-LET escalation in proton therapy of HNC remains to be investigated.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信