Impact of Pomegranate Extract Supplementation on Physical and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 55-70 Years: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Grace Farhat, Jhama Malla, Emad A S Al-Dujaili, Jay Vadher, Pradeepa Nayak, Kenneth Drinkwater
{"title":"Impact of Pomegranate Extract Supplementation on Physical and Cognitive Function in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Aged 55-70 Years: A Randomised Double-Blind Clinical Trial.","authors":"Grace Farhat, Jhama Malla, Emad A S Al-Dujaili, Jay Vadher, Pradeepa Nayak, Kenneth Drinkwater","doi":"10.3390/geriatrics10010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/objectives:</b> Cognitive decline and loss of physical function are common concerns in older adults, with limited effective interventions available. This study aimed to assess the impact of pomegranate extract (PE) supplementation on cognitive and physical function in older adults aged 55-70 years. <b>Methods</b>: A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 86 participants, who were assigned to receive either PE (740 mg) or a placebo (maltodextrin) daily for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using computerised tests (Corsi, digit span, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Tower of Hanoi, Stroop test and Rey auditory verbal learning test). Physical function was measured through assessments of standing balance, gait speed, chair sit to stand and grip strength. <b>Results</b>: There was a significant effect of treatment and time on WCST performance (F (1,2) = 2.718, <i>p</i> = 0.05), while trends towards better outcomes in the PE group were noted for digit span, Tower of Hanoi and Stroop tests. Physical function did not seem to be affected by the intervention, but results may have been limited by the high baseline physical activity levels and full mobility of the older adults. <b>Conclusions:</b> This was the first study to examine the effect of PE on cognitive and physical function over a duration of 12 weeks. Findings suggest that PE supplementation has potential in improving cognitive function and may offer a promising approach to preventing cognitive decline in ageing adults. Further controlled and well-designed long-term studies are needed to establish the long-term effects of PE on cognitive and physical health, along with the mechanisms of action involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12653,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics10010029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Cognitive decline and loss of physical function are common concerns in older adults, with limited effective interventions available. This study aimed to assess the impact of pomegranate extract (PE) supplementation on cognitive and physical function in older adults aged 55-70 years. Methods: A randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 86 participants, who were assigned to receive either PE (740 mg) or a placebo (maltodextrin) daily for 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed using computerised tests (Corsi, digit span, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Tower of Hanoi, Stroop test and Rey auditory verbal learning test). Physical function was measured through assessments of standing balance, gait speed, chair sit to stand and grip strength. Results: There was a significant effect of treatment and time on WCST performance (F (1,2) = 2.718, p = 0.05), while trends towards better outcomes in the PE group were noted for digit span, Tower of Hanoi and Stroop tests. Physical function did not seem to be affected by the intervention, but results may have been limited by the high baseline physical activity levels and full mobility of the older adults. Conclusions: This was the first study to examine the effect of PE on cognitive and physical function over a duration of 12 weeks. Findings suggest that PE supplementation has potential in improving cognitive function and may offer a promising approach to preventing cognitive decline in ageing adults. Further controlled and well-designed long-term studies are needed to establish the long-term effects of PE on cognitive and physical health, along with the mechanisms of action involved.

补充石榴提取物对55-70岁社区老年人身体和认知功能的影响:一项随机双盲临床试验
背景/目的:认知能力下降和身体功能丧失是老年人常见的问题,但有效的干预措施有限。本研究旨在评估石榴提取物(PE)补充剂对55-70岁老年人认知和身体功能的影响。方法:86名参与者进行了一项随机、双盲安慰剂对照试验,他们被分配每天接受PE (740 mg)或安慰剂(麦芽糊精),持续12周。认知功能评估采用计算机化测试(Corsi,数字广度,威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST),河内塔,Stroop测试和Rey听觉语言学习测试)。通过评估站立平衡、步态速度、椅子坐立比和握力来测量身体功能。结果:治疗和时间对WCST表现有显著影响(F (1,2) = 2.718, p = 0.05),而PE组在数字广度、河内塔和Stroop测试中有更好的结果趋势。身体功能似乎没有受到干预的影响,但结果可能受到高基线体力活动水平和老年人完全活动能力的限制。结论:这是第一个在为期12周的研究中检测体育运动对认知和身体功能影响的研究。研究结果表明,补充PE有可能改善认知功能,并可能提供一种有希望的方法来预防老年人的认知能力下降。需要进一步的对照和精心设计的长期研究来确定体育运动对认知和身体健康的长期影响,以及所涉及的作用机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geriatrics
Geriatrics 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
20.03 days
期刊介绍: • Geriatric biology • Geriatric health services research • Geriatric medicine research • Geriatric neurology, stroke, cognition and oncology • Geriatric surgery • Geriatric physical functioning, physical health and activity • Geriatric psychiatry and psychology • Geriatric nutrition • Geriatric epidemiology • Geriatric rehabilitation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信