Cluster analysis of cutting technique-a valuable approach for assessing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk?

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-02-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272
Lasse Mausehund, Anri Patron, Sami Äyrämö, Tron Krosshaug
{"title":"Cluster analysis of cutting technique-a valuable approach for assessing anterior cruciate ligament injury risk?","authors":"Lasse Mausehund, Anri Patron, Sami Äyrämö, Tron Krosshaug","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite extensive efforts to pinpoint singular biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, research findings are still inconclusive. By combining multiple biomechanical variables, cluster analyses could help us identify safe and risky cutting technique strategies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify common movement strategies during cutting maneuvers and to assess their association with ACL injury risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 754 female elite handball and football players, including 59 with a history of ACL injury, performed a sport-specific cutting task while 3D biomechanics were recorded. Over an 8-year follow-up period, 43 of these players sustained a primary ACL injury and 13 players a secondary ACL injury. Cutting technique was described using 36 discrete kinematic variables. To identify different cutting techniques, we employed a K-means clustering algorithm on data subsets involving different numbers of kinematic variables (36, 13 and 5 variables) and different sports (handball, football, and both combined). To assess the impact of the identified cutting technique clusters on ACL injury risk, we compared the proportion of injured players between these clusters using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test and adjusted rand indices (ARI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified two distinguishable cutting technique clusters in the subset involving both sports and five kinematics variables (average silhouette score, ASS = 0.35). However, these clusters were formed based on sport- or task-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> < 0.001, ARI = 0.83) rather than injury-related differences (Fisher's <i>p</i> = 0.417, ARI = 0.00). We also found two cutting technique clusters in the handball (ASS = 0.23) and football (ASS = 0.30) subsets with five kinematic variables. However, none of these clusters appeared to be associated with ACL injury risk (Fisher's <i>p</i> > 0.05, ARI = 0.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No safe or risky cutting technique strategies could be discerned among female elite handball and football players. Cluster analysis of cutting technique, using a K-means algorithm, did not prove to be a valuable approach for assessing ACL injury risk in this dataset.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1463272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1463272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite extensive efforts to pinpoint singular biomechanical risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, research findings are still inconclusive. By combining multiple biomechanical variables, cluster analyses could help us identify safe and risky cutting technique strategies.

Purpose: To identify common movement strategies during cutting maneuvers and to assess their association with ACL injury risk.

Methods: A total of 754 female elite handball and football players, including 59 with a history of ACL injury, performed a sport-specific cutting task while 3D biomechanics were recorded. Over an 8-year follow-up period, 43 of these players sustained a primary ACL injury and 13 players a secondary ACL injury. Cutting technique was described using 36 discrete kinematic variables. To identify different cutting techniques, we employed a K-means clustering algorithm on data subsets involving different numbers of kinematic variables (36, 13 and 5 variables) and different sports (handball, football, and both combined). To assess the impact of the identified cutting technique clusters on ACL injury risk, we compared the proportion of injured players between these clusters using the Fisher-Freeman-Halton Exact test and adjusted rand indices (ARI).

Results: We identified two distinguishable cutting technique clusters in the subset involving both sports and five kinematics variables (average silhouette score, ASS = 0.35). However, these clusters were formed based on sport- or task-related differences (Fisher's p < 0.001, ARI = 0.83) rather than injury-related differences (Fisher's p = 0.417, ARI = 0.00). We also found two cutting technique clusters in the handball (ASS = 0.23) and football (ASS = 0.30) subsets with five kinematic variables. However, none of these clusters appeared to be associated with ACL injury risk (Fisher's p > 0.05, ARI = 0.00).

Conclusion: No safe or risky cutting technique strategies could be discerned among female elite handball and football players. Cluster analysis of cutting technique, using a K-means algorithm, did not prove to be a valuable approach for assessing ACL injury risk in this dataset.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信