Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Newly Diagnosed and Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Wei-Chieh Lee, Huang-Chung Chen, Chih-Yuan Fang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Yun-Yu Hsieh, Tien-Yu Chen, Yen-Nan Fang, Po-Jui Wu, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Ping-Yen Liu
{"title":"Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Newly Diagnosed and Pre-Existing Diabetes Mellitus Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Wei-Chieh Lee, Huang-Chung Chen, Chih-Yuan Fang, Yi-Hsuan Tsai, Yun-Yu Hsieh, Tien-Yu Chen, Yen-Nan Fang, Po-Jui Wu, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Ping-Yen Liu","doi":"10.2174/0115701611322555250219111038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, including recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and mortality, in ACS patients with varying HbA1c levels, addressing the controversy over optimal targets in those with newly diagnosed and pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2005 to December 2019, a total of 33,990 patients were identified with ACS in the Chang Gung Research Database based on their medical history. After excluding patients without DM and baseline or subsequent HbA1C data, a cohort of 11,870 DM patients was divided into two groups: one consisting of 6,089 patients with newly diagnosed DM and the other comprising 5,781 patients with pre-existing DM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the three-year follow-up, the pre-existing DM group experienced worse clinical outcomes, such as increased rates of re-ACS, major bleeding, cardiovascular (CV) events, and all-cause mortality. Optimal HbA1c levels for mitigating re-ACS and/or CV mortality and all-cause mortality appeared to differ between the two DM cohorts. Re-ACS and CV mortality reached their highest at an HbA1c of 6.8% for all DM patients, 6.6% for newly diagnosed, and 6.7% for pre-existing cases. The greatest all-cause mortality risk was at an HbA1c of 7.4% for all DM patients, 7.0% in newly diagnosed, and 8.2% in pre-existing patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upon comparing newly diagnosed DM patients with those with pre-existing DM, a poorer prognosis was observed in the latter group, attributed to older age and a higher burden of comorbidities. Throughout the follow-up period, maintaining consistently low HbA1c levels did not reduce the incidence of re-ACS nor enhance survival rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11278,"journal":{"name":"Current vascular pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115701611322555250219111038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes, including recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and mortality, in ACS patients with varying HbA1c levels, addressing the controversy over optimal targets in those with newly diagnosed and pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: From January 2005 to December 2019, a total of 33,990 patients were identified with ACS in the Chang Gung Research Database based on their medical history. After excluding patients without DM and baseline or subsequent HbA1C data, a cohort of 11,870 DM patients was divided into two groups: one consisting of 6,089 patients with newly diagnosed DM and the other comprising 5,781 patients with pre-existing DM.

Results: During the three-year follow-up, the pre-existing DM group experienced worse clinical outcomes, such as increased rates of re-ACS, major bleeding, cardiovascular (CV) events, and all-cause mortality. Optimal HbA1c levels for mitigating re-ACS and/or CV mortality and all-cause mortality appeared to differ between the two DM cohorts. Re-ACS and CV mortality reached their highest at an HbA1c of 6.8% for all DM patients, 6.6% for newly diagnosed, and 6.7% for pre-existing cases. The greatest all-cause mortality risk was at an HbA1c of 7.4% for all DM patients, 7.0% in newly diagnosed, and 8.2% in pre-existing patients.

Conclusion: Upon comparing newly diagnosed DM patients with those with pre-existing DM, a poorer prognosis was observed in the latter group, attributed to older age and a higher burden of comorbidities. Throughout the follow-up period, maintaining consistently low HbA1c levels did not reduce the incidence of re-ACS nor enhance survival rates.

急性冠脉综合征后新诊断糖尿病患者与既往糖尿病患者临床结局的比较。
目的:本研究旨在评估不同HbA1c水平的ACS患者的临床结果,包括复发性急性冠脉综合征(ACS)和死亡率,解决新诊断和已存在糖尿病(DM)患者的最佳治疗目标的争议。方法:2005年1月至2019年12月,在常庚研究数据库中根据病史识别出33,990例ACS患者。在排除无糖尿病患者和基线或后续HbA1C数据后,11870名糖尿病患者被分为两组:一组由6089名新诊断的糖尿病患者组成,另一组由5781名已存在糖尿病患者组成。结果:在三年的随访中,已存在糖尿病组的临床结果较差,如再acs、大出血、心血管(CV)事件和全因死亡率增加。在两组糖尿病患者中,降低急性冠脉综合征和/或CV死亡率和全因死亡率的最佳HbA1c水平似乎有所不同。所有糖尿病患者在HbA1c为6.8%时,Re-ACS和CV死亡率最高,新诊断为6.6%,已有病例为6.7%。所有糖尿病患者的最大全因死亡风险为HbA1c为7.4%,新诊断为7.0%,已存在患者为8.2%。结论:将新诊断的糖尿病患者与已存在的糖尿病患者进行比较,后一组患者的预后较差,原因是年龄较大,合并症负担较高。在整个随访期间,持续维持较低的HbA1c水平并没有降低再acs的发生率,也没有提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current vascular pharmacology
Current vascular pharmacology 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Vascular Pharmacology publishes clinical and research-based reviews/mini-reviews, original research articles, letters, debates, drug clinical trial studies and guest edited issues to update all those concerned with the treatment of vascular disease, bridging the gap between clinical practice and ongoing research. Vascular disease is the commonest cause of death in Westernized countries and its incidence is on the increase in developing countries. It follows that considerable research is directed at establishing effective treatment for acute vascular events. Long-term treatment has also received considerable attention (e.g. for symptomatic relief). Furthermore, effective prevention, whether primary or secondary, is backed by the findings of several landmark trials. Vascular disease is a complex field with primary care physicians and nurse practitioners as well as several specialties involved. The latter include cardiology, vascular and cardio thoracic surgery, general medicine, radiology, clinical pharmacology and neurology (stroke units).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信