Guided Bone Regeneration Using Carbonated Apatite Granules and L-Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone Membranes: A Case Series and Histological Evaluation.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yoichi Taniguchi, Tatsuro Koyanagi, Yutaro Kitanaka, Azusa Yamada, Akira Aoki, Takanori Iwata
{"title":"Guided Bone Regeneration Using Carbonated Apatite Granules and L-Lactic Acid/ε-Caprolactone Membranes: A Case Series and Histological Evaluation.","authors":"Yoichi Taniguchi, Tatsuro Koyanagi, Yutaro Kitanaka, Azusa Yamada, Akira Aoki, Takanori Iwata","doi":"10.3390/dj13020085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The newly developed poly L-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone (P(LA/LC)) membrane has recently been proposed as a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure in implant treatment. This case series details the clinical, radiographic, and histological results of ridge augmentation using bone graft comprising a P(LA/LC) membrane and carbonated apatite for implant treatment. <b>Methods</b>: Ten patients (15 sites) requiring bone augmentation and implant placement were retrospectively assessed. Simultaneous implant placement (Si) was performed at five sites in three patients. Si immediately following tooth extraction (SiIP) was performed at four sites in four patients. The staged approach (St) was performed at six sites in three patients. In the St-treated cases, hard tissue samples were taken from the implant placement site under patient consent. <b>Results</b>: The mean regenerated bone width for each treatment method was Si, 6.34 ± 2.64 mm (excluding implant diameter, 2.60 ± 2.42); SiIP, 7.55 ± 1.17 mm (excluding implant diameter, 3.90 ± 0.78) and St, 5.57 ± 1.08 mm. The mean regenerated bone width for all the cases was 6.36 ± 1.83 mm (excluding implant diameter, 4.14 ± 1.99). Significant differences were observed between the pre- and post-operative bone width in all the cases and the SiIP group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). All cases were followed up for more than 2 years after attaching the superstructure. No inflammation, shrinkage, or other problems were observed in the hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant. In the histological evaluation, there was no soft tissue ingrowth into the augmented bone, and new bone formation was observed. <b>Conclusions</b>: The use of P(LA/LC) membranes and carbonated apatite as GBR materials in implant treatment resulted in stable and favorable bone augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The newly developed poly L-lactic acid/ε-caprolactone (P(LA/LC)) membrane has recently been proposed as a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure in implant treatment. This case series details the clinical, radiographic, and histological results of ridge augmentation using bone graft comprising a P(LA/LC) membrane and carbonated apatite for implant treatment. Methods: Ten patients (15 sites) requiring bone augmentation and implant placement were retrospectively assessed. Simultaneous implant placement (Si) was performed at five sites in three patients. Si immediately following tooth extraction (SiIP) was performed at four sites in four patients. The staged approach (St) was performed at six sites in three patients. In the St-treated cases, hard tissue samples were taken from the implant placement site under patient consent. Results: The mean regenerated bone width for each treatment method was Si, 6.34 ± 2.64 mm (excluding implant diameter, 2.60 ± 2.42); SiIP, 7.55 ± 1.17 mm (excluding implant diameter, 3.90 ± 0.78) and St, 5.57 ± 1.08 mm. The mean regenerated bone width for all the cases was 6.36 ± 1.83 mm (excluding implant diameter, 4.14 ± 1.99). Significant differences were observed between the pre- and post-operative bone width in all the cases and the SiIP group (p < 0.001). All cases were followed up for more than 2 years after attaching the superstructure. No inflammation, shrinkage, or other problems were observed in the hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant. In the histological evaluation, there was no soft tissue ingrowth into the augmented bone, and new bone formation was observed. Conclusions: The use of P(LA/LC) membranes and carbonated apatite as GBR materials in implant treatment resulted in stable and favorable bone augmentation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信