Comparative evaluation of mechanical effects of two designs of immediately placed customized root-analogue zirconia implants in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions: A finite element analysis.

IF 2.7 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Santhanam Divakar, Manu Rathee, Prachi Jain, Sanju Malik, Sarthak Singh Tomar, Maqbul Alam
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of mechanical effects of two designs of immediately placed customized root-analogue zirconia implants in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions: A finite element analysis.","authors":"Santhanam Divakar, Manu Rathee, Prachi Jain, Sanju Malik, Sarthak Singh Tomar, Maqbul Alam","doi":"10.17219/dmp/152315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Customized root-analogue implants (RAIs) with a press-fit design, inserted immediately after tooth extraction, have garnered attention from the researchers and dentists due to their ability to generate frictional force within the tooth extraction socket.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution and microdisplacement of 2 designs of customized root-analogue zirconia implants in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions using finite element analysis (FEA).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Four computer-aided design (CAD) models of maxillary and mandibular bone with standard density were constructed based on standard tooth dimensions. The models featured 2 distinct designs, namely fin and bulb designs of RAIs, with 2 models designated for the maxillary first molar and 2 models for the mandibular first molar. All three-dimensional models were converted into finite element models using Altair® HyperMesh® software. Thereafter, loads of 300 N and 100 N were applied in the axial direction to analyze the stress distribution and microdisplacement on peri-implant bone areas using FEA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The customized root-analogue zirconia implant with the bulb design showed better stress distribution in the surrounding bone when compared to the RAI with the fin design. The micromotion values of the fin design were found to be lower than those of the bulb design, indicating that the former exhibits superior primary stability. The stress distribution of both designs demonstrated reduced stress values in the maxillary posterior region compared to the mandibular posterior region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The customized root-analogue zirconia implant with added press-fit geometry, i.e, fin or bulb design, has a positive effect on stress distribution and provides enhanced primary stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":"62 1","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/152315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Customized root-analogue implants (RAIs) with a press-fit design, inserted immediately after tooth extraction, have garnered attention from the researchers and dentists due to their ability to generate frictional force within the tooth extraction socket.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution and microdisplacement of 2 designs of customized root-analogue zirconia implants in the maxillary and mandibular posterior regions using finite element analysis (FEA).

Material and methods: Four computer-aided design (CAD) models of maxillary and mandibular bone with standard density were constructed based on standard tooth dimensions. The models featured 2 distinct designs, namely fin and bulb designs of RAIs, with 2 models designated for the maxillary first molar and 2 models for the mandibular first molar. All three-dimensional models were converted into finite element models using Altair® HyperMesh® software. Thereafter, loads of 300 N and 100 N were applied in the axial direction to analyze the stress distribution and microdisplacement on peri-implant bone areas using FEA.

Results: The customized root-analogue zirconia implant with the bulb design showed better stress distribution in the surrounding bone when compared to the RAI with the fin design. The micromotion values of the fin design were found to be lower than those of the bulb design, indicating that the former exhibits superior primary stability. The stress distribution of both designs demonstrated reduced stress values in the maxillary posterior region compared to the mandibular posterior region.

Conclusions: The customized root-analogue zirconia implant with added press-fit geometry, i.e, fin or bulb design, has a positive effect on stress distribution and provides enhanced primary stability.

两种设计在上颌和下颌后区即刻放置定制根模拟氧化锆种植体力学效果的比较:有限元分析。
背景:定制的牙根模拟种植体(RAIs)具有压合设计,在拔牙后立即插入,由于其能够在拔牙槽内产生摩擦力,已经引起了研究人员和牙医的关注。目的:应用有限元分析(finite element analysis, FEA)评价两种定制型牙根模拟氧化锆种植体在上颌和下颌后牙区的应力分布和微位移。材料与方法:根据标准牙齿尺寸,建立上颌、下颌骨标准密度计算机辅助设计(CAD)模型。模型有2种不同的设计,即rai的鳍形和球形设计,其中上颌第一磨牙2个模型,下颌第一磨牙2个模型。使用Altair®HyperMesh®软件将所有三维模型转换为有限元模型。然后,在轴向施加300 N和100 N的载荷,利用有限元分析方法分析种植体周围骨区的应力分布和微位移。结果:与鳍形设计的RAI相比,球状设计的定制模拟根氧化锆种植体在周围骨中的应力分布更好。翅片设计的微动值低于球泡设计的微动值,表明前者具有更好的初级稳定性。两种设计的应力分布表明,与下颌后区相比,上颌后区应力值降低。结论:定制的根状模拟氧化锆种植体增加了压合几何形状,即鳍状或球状设计,对应力分布有积极影响,并提高了初级稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信