Antibacterial Efficacy of Benefect™ Botanical Disinfectant in Comparison with Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorohexidine Against Multiple Endodontic Pathogens: An Ex Vivo Study.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sarmed Toma, Joseph Ferracciolo, Mazin Askar, Eric Krukonis, Susan Paurazas
{"title":"Antibacterial Efficacy of Benefect™ Botanical Disinfectant in Comparison with Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorohexidine Against Multiple Endodontic Pathogens: An Ex Vivo Study.","authors":"Sarmed Toma, Joseph Ferracciolo, Mazin Askar, Eric Krukonis, Susan Paurazas","doi":"10.3390/dj13020087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Natural antibacterial agents, such as essential oils, can potentially be used for endodontic disinfection with less toxicity than other available irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). Benefect<sup>TM</sup> is a formulation of essential oils with broad antibacterial spectrum efficacy. This study aims to compare the antibacterial efficacy of Benefect<sup>TM</sup> to 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX irrigant solutions against multiple endodontic pathogens. <b>Methods</b>: The study utilized 100 extracted human single-canal permanent teeth. Samples were decoronated, instrumented, and autoclaved. The teeth were infected with <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Actinomyces naeslundii</i>, or <i>Porphyromonas gingivalis</i> for 6-24 h. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the irrigant solution used. Contact with each irrigant was maintained for 12 min. The antibacterial efficacy of each treatment was calculated relative to viable bacteria recovered after saline treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's <i>t</i>-test. <b>Results</b>: All <i>S. mutans</i> samples treated with NaOCl, CHX, and Benefect<sup>TM</sup> showed a complete absence of bacterial colonies when compared to saline (>99.9% killing). The <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>A. naeslundii</i>, and <i>P. gingivalis</i> samples treated with all tested irrigants showed at least 99% antibacterial killing activity. There was no statistical difference in killing between these three antimicrobial treatments. <b>Conclusions</b>: Benefect<sup>TM</sup> botanical disinfectant has comparable antibacterial efficacy to NaOCl and CHX against <i>S. mutans</i>, <i>E. faecalis</i>, <i>A. naeslundii</i>, and <i>P. gingivalis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Natural antibacterial agents, such as essential oils, can potentially be used for endodontic disinfection with less toxicity than other available irrigants such as sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine (CHX). BenefectTM is a formulation of essential oils with broad antibacterial spectrum efficacy. This study aims to compare the antibacterial efficacy of BenefectTM to 6% NaOCl and 2% CHX irrigant solutions against multiple endodontic pathogens. Methods: The study utilized 100 extracted human single-canal permanent teeth. Samples were decoronated, instrumented, and autoclaved. The teeth were infected with Streptococcus mutans, Enterococcus faecalis, Actinomyces naeslundii, or Porphyromonas gingivalis for 6-24 h. The teeth were divided into four groups according to the irrigant solution used. Contact with each irrigant was maintained for 12 min. The antibacterial efficacy of each treatment was calculated relative to viable bacteria recovered after saline treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. Results: All S. mutans samples treated with NaOCl, CHX, and BenefectTM showed a complete absence of bacterial colonies when compared to saline (>99.9% killing). The E. faecalis, A. naeslundii, and P. gingivalis samples treated with all tested irrigants showed at least 99% antibacterial killing activity. There was no statistical difference in killing between these three antimicrobial treatments. Conclusions: BenefectTM botanical disinfectant has comparable antibacterial efficacy to NaOCl and CHX against S. mutans, E. faecalis, A. naeslundii, and P. gingivalis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信