Implementation of Virtual Reality in Preclinical Pediatric Dentistry Learning: A Comparison Between Simodont® and Conventional Methods.

IF 3.1 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Antonia M Caleya, Andrea Martín-Vacas, María Rosa Mourelle-Martínez, Manuel Joaquín de Nova-Garcia, Nuria E Gallardo-López
{"title":"Implementation of Virtual Reality in Preclinical Pediatric Dentistry Learning: A Comparison Between Simodont<sup>®</sup> and Conventional Methods.","authors":"Antonia M Caleya, Andrea Martín-Vacas, María Rosa Mourelle-Martínez, Manuel Joaquín de Nova-Garcia, Nuria E Gallardo-López","doi":"10.3390/dj13020051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Preclinical training in pediatric dentistry is traditionally performed on acrylic primary teeth or natural extracted teeth in phantoms or dental manikins. With technological advancements, virtual simulation has become increasingly common, enhancing the development of cognitive and motor skills in dental students while complementing traditional methods. Specific objectives included assessing whether preclinical theoretical knowledge impacts motor skill scores, comparing the quality of dental preparations on acrylic teeth versus those performed using virtual simulation (Simodont<sup>®</sup>) and evaluating students' perceptions of Simodont<sup>®</sup> use. <b>Methods:</b> An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. Students first completed a theoretical knowledge survey on dental preparations, class II caries, and pulpotomies. They then performed dental preparations on both acrylic primary teeth and the Simodont<sup>®</sup> simulator, with their work assessed by a pediatric dentistry professor. Finally, students completed a perception survey regarding their experience. <b>Results:</b> The introduction of the Simodont<sup>®</sup> was positively received. Theoretical knowledge prior to preclinical exercises did not significantly influence practice scores. Average scores for preparations on acrylic teeth (class II: 2.57; pulpotomy: 3.60) were higher than those achieved using Simodont<sup>®</sup> (class II: 1.97; pulpotomy: 2.92). <b>Conclusions</b>: Dental preparation scores were higher on acrylic teeth compared to the virtual simulation. While students reported a positive experience with Simodont<sup>®</sup>, they expressed a preference for traditional learning methods involving acrylic teeth on phantoms or dental manikins.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13020051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Preclinical training in pediatric dentistry is traditionally performed on acrylic primary teeth or natural extracted teeth in phantoms or dental manikins. With technological advancements, virtual simulation has become increasingly common, enhancing the development of cognitive and motor skills in dental students while complementing traditional methods. Specific objectives included assessing whether preclinical theoretical knowledge impacts motor skill scores, comparing the quality of dental preparations on acrylic teeth versus those performed using virtual simulation (Simodont®) and evaluating students' perceptions of Simodont® use. Methods: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted. Students first completed a theoretical knowledge survey on dental preparations, class II caries, and pulpotomies. They then performed dental preparations on both acrylic primary teeth and the Simodont® simulator, with their work assessed by a pediatric dentistry professor. Finally, students completed a perception survey regarding their experience. Results: The introduction of the Simodont® was positively received. Theoretical knowledge prior to preclinical exercises did not significantly influence practice scores. Average scores for preparations on acrylic teeth (class II: 2.57; pulpotomy: 3.60) were higher than those achieved using Simodont® (class II: 1.97; pulpotomy: 2.92). Conclusions: Dental preparation scores were higher on acrylic teeth compared to the virtual simulation. While students reported a positive experience with Simodont®, they expressed a preference for traditional learning methods involving acrylic teeth on phantoms or dental manikins.

虚拟现实技术在儿童牙科临床前学习中的应用:Simodont® 与传统方法的比较。
背景/目的:儿童牙科的临床前培训传统上是在丙烯酸乳牙或自然拔牙的模型或牙科模型上进行的。随着技术的进步,虚拟模拟已经变得越来越普遍,增强了牙科学生的认知和运动技能的发展,同时补充了传统的方法。具体目标包括评估临床前理论知识是否会影响运动技能得分,比较丙烯酸牙齿和使用虚拟模拟(simodon®)进行牙齿准备的质量,以及评估学生对simodon®使用的看法。方法:采用观察性、描述性、横断面研究。学生们首先完成了牙齿准备、二类龋齿和牙髓切开术的理论知识调查。然后,他们在丙烯酸乳牙和simodon®模拟器上进行牙齿准备,并由儿科牙科教授评估他们的工作。最后,学生们完成了一份关于他们经历的感知调查。结果:simodon®的引入获得了积极的反响。临床前练习前的理论知识对实践分数没有显著影响。丙烯牙预备平均评分(II类:2.57分;牙髓切开术:3.60)高于使用simodon®(II类:1.97;牙髓切除术:2.92)。结论:与虚拟模拟牙相比,丙烯酸牙的预备牙评分更高。虽然学生们报告了simodon®的积极体验,但他们表示更喜欢传统的学习方法,包括在幻影或牙齿模型上的丙烯酸牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信