Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy with Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-02-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015
Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee
{"title":"Diagnostic Yield and Synergistic Impact of Needle Aspiration and Forceps Biopsy with Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy for Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (CONFIDENT-ENB): A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Yeon Wook Kim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Byoung Soo Kwon, Ye Jin Lee, Myung Jin Song, Sung Hyun Yoon, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Jong Sun Park, Young-Jae Cho, Kyung Hee Lee, Jin-Haeng Chung, Yeon Bi Han, Fabien Maldonado, So Yeon Ahn, Youngmi Park, Dong-Hyun Joo, Jae Ho Lee, Choon-Taek Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63/142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73/142) for needle aspiration (p=0.221 vs. forceps), and 66.9% (95/142) for the combination (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone, p<0.001 vs. needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70/120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57/120) for forceps biopsy (p=0.074). The combination of the two modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86/120) compared with either individual modality (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5/142) of patients, and 1.4% (2/142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared to each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT05110131.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.02.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) is an advanced imaging-guided technique used to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions. However, the optimal strategy for selecting biopsy devices remains unclear.

Research question: Does the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy improve diagnostic yield compared with that using a single device alone?

Study design and methods: We conducted a randomized crossover study during ENB performed under moderate sedation. This trial recruited participants with peripheral pulmonary lesions requiring biopsy who were eligible for elective ENB. ENB-guided needle aspiration and forceps biopsy were sequentially performed in a randomized order. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of patients for whom the biopsy provided a specific diagnosis able to inform patient management. The diagnostic yield achieved by each biopsy modality individually and in combination was evaluated.

Results: Between December 1, 2021, and November 13, 2023, 142 participants were enrolled and underwent the study procedures. Complete follow-up data were obtained for 140 participants. Diagnostic yield was 44.4% (63/142) for forceps biopsy, 51.4% (73/142) for needle aspiration (p=0.221 vs. forceps), and 66.9% (95/142) for the combination (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone, p<0.001 vs. needle alone). Sensitivities for malignancy were 58.3% (70/120) for needle aspiration and 47.5% (57/120) for forceps biopsy (p=0.074). The combination of the two modalities resulted in a significantly improved sensitivity of 71.7% (86/120) compared with either individual modality (p<0.001 vs. forceps alone and needle alone). Pneumothorax occurred in 3.5% (5/142) of patients, and 1.4% (2/142) developed pneumothorax requiring tube drainage.

Interpretation: When performing ENB under moderate sedation, the combination of needle aspiration and forceps biopsy significantly improves the diagnostic yield and sensitivity for malignancy compared to each modality alone, with a favorable safety profile. These results indicate that a multimodal approach using needles and forceps is a valid diagnostic strategy for ENB.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05110131.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信