Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Karmen S Williams, Saurabh Rahurkar, Shaun J Grannis, Titus K Schleyer, Brian E Dixon
{"title":"Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care.","authors":"Karmen S Williams, Saurabh Rahurkar, Shaun J Grannis, Titus K Schleyer, Brian E Dixon","doi":"10.1186/s12911-025-02933-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Motivated by the Triple Aim, US health care policy is expanding its focus from individual patient care to include population health management. Health Information Exchanges are positioned to play an important role in that expansion.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to describe the evolution of the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC) and discuss examples of its innovations that support both population health and clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive analytical approach was used to gather information on the INPC. This included a literature review of recent systematic and scoping reviews, collection of research that used INPC data as a resource, and data abstracted by Regenstrief Data Services to understand the breadth of uses for the INPC as a data resource.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although INPC data are primarily gathered from and used in healthcare settings, their use for population health management and research has increased. By December 2023, the INPC contained nearly 25 million patients, a significant growth from 3.5 million in 2004. This growth was a result of the use of INPC data for population health surveillance, clinical applications for data, disease registries, Patient-Centered Data Homes, non-clinical population health advancements, and accountable care organization connections with Health Information Exchanges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By structuring services on the fundamental building blocks, expanding the focus to population health, and ensuring value in the services provided to the stakeholders, Health Information Exchanges are uniquely positioned to support both population health and clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"25 1","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11849299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-025-02933-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Motivated by the Triple Aim, US health care policy is expanding its focus from individual patient care to include population health management. Health Information Exchanges are positioned to play an important role in that expansion.

Objective: The objective is to describe the evolution of the Indiana Network for Patient Care (INPC) and discuss examples of its innovations that support both population health and clinical applications.

Methods: A descriptive analytical approach was used to gather information on the INPC. This included a literature review of recent systematic and scoping reviews, collection of research that used INPC data as a resource, and data abstracted by Regenstrief Data Services to understand the breadth of uses for the INPC as a data resource.

Results: Although INPC data are primarily gathered from and used in healthcare settings, their use for population health management and research has increased. By December 2023, the INPC contained nearly 25 million patients, a significant growth from 3.5 million in 2004. This growth was a result of the use of INPC data for population health surveillance, clinical applications for data, disease registries, Patient-Centered Data Homes, non-clinical population health advancements, and accountable care organization connections with Health Information Exchanges.

Conclusion: By structuring services on the fundamental building blocks, expanding the focus to population health, and ensuring value in the services provided to the stakeholders, Health Information Exchanges are uniquely positioned to support both population health and clinical applications.

临床健康信息交换对人口健康资源的演变:印第安纳州患者护理网络的案例研究。
背景:在三重目标的推动下,美国卫生保健政策正在将其重点从个体患者护理扩大到包括人口健康管理。卫生信息交流中心将在这方面发挥重要作用。目的:目的是描述印第安纳州病人护理网络(INPC)的演变,并讨论其支持人口健康和临床应用的创新实例。方法:采用描述性分析方法收集有关INPC的信息。这包括对最近的系统和范围审查的文献回顾,使用INPC数据作为资源的研究收集,以及由Regenstrief数据服务抽象的数据,以了解INPC作为数据资源的使用范围。结果:尽管INPC数据主要是从卫生保健环境中收集和使用的,但它们在人口健康管理和研究中的应用已经增加。到2023年12月,国家疾病控制和预防中心有近2500万患者,较2004年的350万有显著增长。这一增长是将INPC数据用于人口健康监测、数据临床应用、疾病登记、以患者为中心的数据之家、非临床人口健康进步以及负责任的护理组织与健康信息交换的联系的结果。结论:通过在基本构建模块上构建服务,将重点扩大到人口健康,并确保向利益相关者提供的服务具有价值,健康信息交换在支持人口健康和临床应用方面具有独特的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信