Efficacy of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with or without Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis.
Luyao Wang, Shiyu Liu, Tingting He, Chun Liu, Junguo Duan
{"title":"Efficacy of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Agents in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Patients with or without Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Luyao Wang, Shiyu Liu, Tingting He, Chun Liu, Junguo Duan","doi":"10.12968/hmed.2024.0673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aims/Background</b> The classification of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) as a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) remained an ongoing controversy. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in nAMD patients with or without PCV. <b>Methods</b> A systematic search was conducted in four databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, from their inception to 1 July 2023. The outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and center retinal thickness (CRT) from the baseline to different follow-up durations. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was performed when significant heterogeneity was detected. <b>Results</b> This meta-analysis included sixteen studies involving 6679 patients, comprising 5070 non-PCV and 1609 PCV cases. The findings revealed that the improvement in BCVA at 6-month follow-up (mean difference (MD) = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02 to 0.07; <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and the reduction in CRT at 3-month follow-up duration (MD = 10.29; 95% CI, 0.93 to 19.66; <i>p</i> = 0.03) were significantly greater in the PCV group compared to the non-PCV group. <b>Conclusion</b> This meta-analysis indicates that PCV may exhibit better short-term efficacy in response to anti-VEGF therapy than non-PCV. <b>Systematic Review Registration</b> PROSPERO (CRD42023445591).</p>","PeriodicalId":9256,"journal":{"name":"British journal of hospital medicine","volume":"86 2","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/hmed.2024.0673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims/Background The classification of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) as a subtype of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) remained an ongoing controversy. This meta-analysis examines the efficacy of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in nAMD patients with or without PCV. Methods A systematic search was conducted in four databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library, from their inception to 1 July 2023. The outcome measure was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and center retinal thickness (CRT) from the baseline to different follow-up durations. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was performed when significant heterogeneity was detected. Results This meta-analysis included sixteen studies involving 6679 patients, comprising 5070 non-PCV and 1609 PCV cases. The findings revealed that the improvement in BCVA at 6-month follow-up (mean difference (MD) = 0.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.02 to 0.07; p = 0.0001) and the reduction in CRT at 3-month follow-up duration (MD = 10.29; 95% CI, 0.93 to 19.66; p = 0.03) were significantly greater in the PCV group compared to the non-PCV group. Conclusion This meta-analysis indicates that PCV may exhibit better short-term efficacy in response to anti-VEGF therapy than non-PCV. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO (CRD42023445591).
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Hospital Medicine was established in 1966, and is still true to its origins: a monthly, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary review journal for hospital doctors and doctors in training.
The journal publishes an authoritative mix of clinical reviews, education and training updates, quality improvement projects and case reports, and book reviews from recognized leaders in the profession. The Core Training for Doctors section provides clinical information in an easily accessible format for doctors in training.
British Journal of Hospital Medicine is an invaluable resource for hospital doctors at all stages of their career.
The journal is indexed on Medline, CINAHL, the Sociedad Iberoamericana de Información Científica and Scopus.