Comparative efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin and oral nifedipine in managing preterm labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Mahnaz Azari, Maryam Shami, Mona Larki, Somayeh Makvandi
{"title":"Comparative efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin and oral nifedipine in managing preterm labor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Mahnaz Azari, Maryam Shami, Mona Larki, Somayeh Makvandi","doi":"10.1186/s12887-025-05471-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm delivery is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin and oral nifedipine in managing preterm labor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of nitroglycerin vs. nifedipine in the management of preterm labor. Primary outcomes were the prolongation of pregnancy and gestational age at delivery, while secondary outcomes included maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 electronic databases, includingsoftware.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighteen studies were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between nitroglycerin and nifedipine in prolonging pregnancy for 48 h (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.07, p = 0.3), 7 days (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.11, p = 0.88), or beyond 7 days (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.1, p = 0.36). Both treatments showed no significant advantage in prolonging gestational age at delivery (MD = 0.25, 95% CI -0.61-1.12, p = 0.58). Nitroglycerin was associated with an increased risk of headache (RR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.23-4.05, p = 0.009), while nifedipine was linked to higher rates of tachycardia (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.69, p < 0.00001) and palpitations (R = 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in neonatal outcomes, including birth weight (MD = -44.28, 95% CI -266.80-178.24, p = 0.70) and NICU admission rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.61-1.59, p = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nitroglycerin and nifedipine demonstrate similar efficacy in prolonging pregnancy and influencing neonatal outcomes, though their side effect profiles differ. Nifedipine is associated with more tachycardia and palpitations, while nitroglycerin causes more headaches. Further high-quality studies are required due to current evidence's low to very low certainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"136"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05471-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm delivery is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of transdermal nitroglycerin and oral nifedipine in managing preterm labor.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for the randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of nitroglycerin vs. nifedipine in the management of preterm labor. Primary outcomes were the prolongation of pregnancy and gestational age at delivery, while secondary outcomes included maternal side effects and neonatal outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 electronic databases, includingsoftware.

Results: Eighteen studies were included. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference between nitroglycerin and nifedipine in prolonging pregnancy for 48 h (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.81-1.07, p = 0.3), 7 days (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.88-1.11, p = 0.88), or beyond 7 days (RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.76-1.1, p = 0.36). Both treatments showed no significant advantage in prolonging gestational age at delivery (MD = 0.25, 95% CI -0.61-1.12, p = 0.58). Nitroglycerin was associated with an increased risk of headache (RR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.23-4.05, p = 0.009), while nifedipine was linked to higher rates of tachycardia (RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.38-0.69, p < 0.00001) and palpitations (R = 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001). No significant differences were observed in neonatal outcomes, including birth weight (MD = -44.28, 95% CI -266.80-178.24, p = 0.70) and NICU admission rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.61-1.59, p = 0.96).

Conclusions: Nitroglycerin and nifedipine demonstrate similar efficacy in prolonging pregnancy and influencing neonatal outcomes, though their side effect profiles differ. Nifedipine is associated with more tachycardia and palpitations, while nitroglycerin causes more headaches. Further high-quality studies are required due to current evidence's low to very low certainty.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信