Comparative diagnostic performance of VI-RADS based on biparametric and multiparametric MRI in predicting muscle invasion in bladder cancer.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Peikun Liu, Lingkai Cai, Linjing Jiang, Haonan Chen, Qiang Cao, Kexin Bai, Rongjie Bai, Qikai Wu, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu
{"title":"Comparative diagnostic performance of VI-RADS based on biparametric and multiparametric MRI in predicting muscle invasion in bladder cancer.","authors":"Peikun Liu, Lingkai Cai, Linjing Jiang, Haonan Chen, Qiang Cao, Kexin Bai, Rongjie Bai, Qikai Wu, Xiao Yang, Qiang Lu","doi":"10.1186/s12880-025-01595-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) performed well in diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, certain cases may present challenges in determining the final VI-RADS score using only T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, especially in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. This study aims to evaluates whether biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) achieve comparable diagnostic performance to mp-MRI for predicting MIBC and seeks to identify the most suitable bp-MRI criterion by establishing four specific conditions based on T2WI and DWI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 447 patients who underwent preoperative mp-MRI. Images were evaluated according to the VI-RADS protocol by three independent readers. In the bp-DWI and bp-DWI Plus criteria, DWI was the primary sequence used for lesion assessment, while T2WI was the primary sequence for bp-T2WI and bp-T2WI Plus criteria. The Plus criteria (bp-DWI Plus and bp-T2WI Plus) assigned a final VI-RADS score of 4 when both T2WI and DWI scores were 3. The gold standard for diagnosis was histopathological evaluation after surgery. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and inter-reader agreement using Cohen's kappa analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 447 patients, 304 confirmed as NMIBC and 143 as MIBC. The kappa values were 0.876, 0.873, 0.873, 0.642, and 0.642 for mp-MRI, bp-DWI, bp-DWI Plus, bp-T2WI, and bp-T2WI Plus, respectively, when VI-RADS cutoff > 2. Similarly, when cutoff > 3, the kappa values were 0.848, 0.811, 0.873, 0.811, and 0.873. No significant differences were observed between mp-MRI and bp-DWI (AUC: 0.916 vs. 0.912, p = 0.498), but mp-MRI and bp-DWI had higher AUCs compared to bp-DWI Plus, bp-T2WI, and bp-T2WI Plus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both mp-MRI and bp-DWI demonstrate excellent performance in predicting MIBC, with bp-DWI being an alternative to mp-MRI.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>retrospectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"25 1","pages":"60"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01595-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) performed well in diagnosing muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, certain cases may present challenges in determining the final VI-RADS score using only T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences, especially in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. This study aims to evaluates whether biparametric MRI (bp-MRI) achieve comparable diagnostic performance to mp-MRI for predicting MIBC and seeks to identify the most suitable bp-MRI criterion by establishing four specific conditions based on T2WI and DWI.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 447 patients who underwent preoperative mp-MRI. Images were evaluated according to the VI-RADS protocol by three independent readers. In the bp-DWI and bp-DWI Plus criteria, DWI was the primary sequence used for lesion assessment, while T2WI was the primary sequence for bp-T2WI and bp-T2WI Plus criteria. The Plus criteria (bp-DWI Plus and bp-T2WI Plus) assigned a final VI-RADS score of 4 when both T2WI and DWI scores were 3. The gold standard for diagnosis was histopathological evaluation after surgery. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by comparing the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and inter-reader agreement using Cohen's kappa analysis.

Results: Among 447 patients, 304 confirmed as NMIBC and 143 as MIBC. The kappa values were 0.876, 0.873, 0.873, 0.642, and 0.642 for mp-MRI, bp-DWI, bp-DWI Plus, bp-T2WI, and bp-T2WI Plus, respectively, when VI-RADS cutoff > 2. Similarly, when cutoff > 3, the kappa values were 0.848, 0.811, 0.873, 0.811, and 0.873. No significant differences were observed between mp-MRI and bp-DWI (AUC: 0.916 vs. 0.912, p = 0.498), but mp-MRI and bp-DWI had higher AUCs compared to bp-DWI Plus, bp-T2WI, and bp-T2WI Plus.

Conclusions: Both mp-MRI and bp-DWI demonstrate excellent performance in predicting MIBC, with bp-DWI being an alternative to mp-MRI.

Trial registration: retrospectively.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信