A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mario Ceddia, Luciano Lamberti, Bartolomeo Trentadue
{"title":"A Finite Element Study of Simulated Fusion in an L4-L5 Model: Influence of the Combination of Materials in the Screw-and-Rod Fixation System on Reproducing Natural Bone Behavior.","authors":"Mario Ceddia, Luciano Lamberti, Bartolomeo Trentadue","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics10020072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) in spinal fixation using finite element analysis, through the evaluation of the <i>Shielding Strength Factor</i> (<i>SSF</i>). <b>Methods:</b> A three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) model of an L4/L5 functional spinal unit was developed to simulate the mechanical behavior of three fixation systems: titanium screws and rods (model A), titanium screws with PEEK rods (model B), and PEEK screws and rods (model C). The analysis evaluated stress distribution and load transfer under physiological conditions, in comparison with the intact spine (baseline model). <b>Results</b>: The analysis showed that titanium fixation systems resulted in higher stress shielding effects, with a significant difference in stress distribution compared to PEEK. The maximum stress recorded in the neutral position was 24.145 MPa for PEEK, indicating better biomechanical compatibility. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results suggest that PEEK may be an attractive alternative to titanium for spinal fixation, promoting more healthy load transfer and minimizing the risk of stress shielding complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11853378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10020072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The mechanical properties of materials for spinal fixation can significantly affect spinal surgical outcomes. Traditional materials such as titanium exhibit high stiffness, which can lead to stress shielding and adjacent segment degeneration. This study investigates the biomechanical performance of titanium and PEEK (polyetheretherketone) in spinal fixation using finite element analysis, through the evaluation of the Shielding Strength Factor (SSF). Methods: A three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) model of an L4/L5 functional spinal unit was developed to simulate the mechanical behavior of three fixation systems: titanium screws and rods (model A), titanium screws with PEEK rods (model B), and PEEK screws and rods (model C). The analysis evaluated stress distribution and load transfer under physiological conditions, in comparison with the intact spine (baseline model). Results: The analysis showed that titanium fixation systems resulted in higher stress shielding effects, with a significant difference in stress distribution compared to PEEK. The maximum stress recorded in the neutral position was 24.145 MPa for PEEK, indicating better biomechanical compatibility. Conclusions: The results suggest that PEEK may be an attractive alternative to titanium for spinal fixation, promoting more healthy load transfer and minimizing the risk of stress shielding complications.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信