Nasal or Submandibular Intubation for Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery to Correct Jaw Deformities Secondary to Cleft Lip and Palate: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yifan Wu, Han Ge, Heyou Gao, Zihang Zhou, Bin Ye, Jihua Li
{"title":"Nasal or Submandibular Intubation for Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery to Correct Jaw Deformities Secondary to Cleft Lip and Palate: Which One Is the Optimal Choice?","authors":"Yifan Wu, Han Ge, Heyou Gao, Zihang Zhou, Bin Ye, Jihua Li","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04729-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the optimal airway management of orthognathic surgery anesthesia for correcting jaw deformity secondary to cleft lip and palate (CLP) by comparing the differences between nasal and submandibular intubation. Preoperative (T0), 1 week postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2) CT scans and vital signs after oral intubation (S0), before reconnection of the submandibular tracheal catheter (S1), and after reconnection (S2) were collected from 54 patients who received nasal intubation (Group I) and submandibular intubation (Group II). The results were evaluated using 3D reconstruction and analysis in Mimics. During the follow-up, all patients demonstrated satisfactory facial shape and stable occlusion and no significant complications were observed. In Group II, maxillary operation duration and blood loss were significantly reduced (P < 0.001), and nasal septum deviation was distinctly improved (P < 0.001). Both groups exhibited increased nasal alar width, but Group I particularly females showed greater changes (P < 0.05). Only 2 patients (6%) in Group II developed hypertrophic scars 6 months postoperatively. This study demonstrates that submandibular intubation anesthesia represents a straightforward, safe and less complicated technique in orthognathic surgery for CLP patients. Nevertheless, this method should be carefully chosen for patients with scar constitution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04729-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate the optimal airway management of orthognathic surgery anesthesia for correcting jaw deformity secondary to cleft lip and palate (CLP) by comparing the differences between nasal and submandibular intubation. Preoperative (T0), 1 week postoperatively (T1), and 6 months postoperatively (T2) CT scans and vital signs after oral intubation (S0), before reconnection of the submandibular tracheal catheter (S1), and after reconnection (S2) were collected from 54 patients who received nasal intubation (Group I) and submandibular intubation (Group II). The results were evaluated using 3D reconstruction and analysis in Mimics. During the follow-up, all patients demonstrated satisfactory facial shape and stable occlusion and no significant complications were observed. In Group II, maxillary operation duration and blood loss were significantly reduced (P < 0.001), and nasal septum deviation was distinctly improved (P < 0.001). Both groups exhibited increased nasal alar width, but Group I particularly females showed greater changes (P < 0.05). Only 2 patients (6%) in Group II developed hypertrophic scars 6 months postoperatively. This study demonstrates that submandibular intubation anesthesia represents a straightforward, safe and less complicated technique in orthognathic surgery for CLP patients. Nevertheless, this method should be carefully chosen for patients with scar constitution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

在矫正唇腭裂继发颌骨畸形的正颌外科手术中使用鼻腔插管还是下颌下腺插管进行麻醉?哪一种是最佳选择?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
479
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP). Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信