Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with linaclotide versus senna for bowel preparation: A multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial (Apple trial).

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Natsumi Maeda, Akira Higashimori, Daijiro Kabata, Ikki Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Yanagida, Daiyu Kin, Yuji Matsumoto, Rieko Nakata, Atsushi Hashimoto, Akinari Sawada, Hirotsugu Maruyama, Junichi Okamoto, Takayuki Katsuno, Yuji Nadatani, Masaki Ominami, Shusei Fukunaga, Kenichi Morimoto, Shuhei Hosomi, Fumio Tanaka, Masami Nakatani, Koichi Taira, Eiji Sasaki, Takashi Fukuda, Keiko Ota, Hisako Yoshida, Toshio Watanabe, Yasuhiro Fujiwara
{"title":"Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid with linaclotide versus senna for bowel preparation: A multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial (Apple trial).","authors":"Natsumi Maeda, Akira Higashimori, Daijiro Kabata, Ikki Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Yanagida, Daiyu Kin, Yuji Matsumoto, Rieko Nakata, Atsushi Hashimoto, Akinari Sawada, Hirotsugu Maruyama, Junichi Okamoto, Takayuki Katsuno, Yuji Nadatani, Masaki Ominami, Shusei Fukunaga, Kenichi Morimoto, Shuhei Hosomi, Fumio Tanaka, Masami Nakatani, Koichi Taira, Eiji Sasaki, Takashi Fukuda, Keiko Ota, Hisako Yoshida, Toshio Watanabe, Yasuhiro Fujiwara","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>No bowel preparation for colonoscopy achieves optimal efficacy and tolerability. Combining polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) with adjuvants has been explored to enhance cleansing efficacy and reduce the required volume. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding 0.5 mg linaclotide to 1-L PEG-Asc (1 L-PEG/AL) improves superior cleansing compared to adding 24 mg senna (1 L-PEG/AS), which we previously reported to be non-inferior to the standard regimen of 2 L PEG-Asc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at five centers in Japan with outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation (BP), evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Analyses were stratified based on low- and high-risk groups for inadequate BP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between April 2022 and April 2023, 1,464 patients were randomized to the 1L-PEG/AL (n=733) or 1L-PEG/AS (n=731). The 1L-PEG/AL demonstrated higher adequate BP rates (92% vs. 86%, P=0.001) compared to 1L-PEG/AS. Both groups experienced similar adverse events and expressed high willingness for repeat BP (83% vs. 81%, P=0.49). In high-risk patients (n=892), 1L-PEG/AL had significantly higher adequate BP rates (94% vs. 86%, P<0.001), whereas rates were comparably high in low-risk patients (n=539) (94% vs. 94%, P=0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The linaclotide regimen was superior to the senna regimen in terms of BP efficacy without reducing tolerability. It can be a promising new option for BP, especially in patients at a high-risk of inadequate BP.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003370","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: No bowel preparation for colonoscopy achieves optimal efficacy and tolerability. Combining polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc) with adjuvants has been explored to enhance cleansing efficacy and reduce the required volume. This study aimed to evaluate whether adding 0.5 mg linaclotide to 1-L PEG-Asc (1 L-PEG/AL) improves superior cleansing compared to adding 24 mg senna (1 L-PEG/AS), which we previously reported to be non-inferior to the standard regimen of 2 L PEG-Asc.

Methods: A multicenter, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted at five centers in Japan with outpatients scheduled for colonoscopy. The primary outcome was adequate bowel preparation (BP), evaluated using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Analyses were stratified based on low- and high-risk groups for inadequate BP.

Results: Between April 2022 and April 2023, 1,464 patients were randomized to the 1L-PEG/AL (n=733) or 1L-PEG/AS (n=731). The 1L-PEG/AL demonstrated higher adequate BP rates (92% vs. 86%, P=0.001) compared to 1L-PEG/AS. Both groups experienced similar adverse events and expressed high willingness for repeat BP (83% vs. 81%, P=0.49). In high-risk patients (n=892), 1L-PEG/AL had significantly higher adequate BP rates (94% vs. 86%, P<0.001), whereas rates were comparably high in low-risk patients (n=539) (94% vs. 94%, P=0.66).

Conclusions: The linaclotide regimen was superior to the senna regimen in terms of BP efficacy without reducing tolerability. It can be a promising new option for BP, especially in patients at a high-risk of inadequate BP.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信