Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.810
Jacob Jorem, Reidun Førde, Tonje Lossius Husum, Jørgen Dahlberg, Reidar Pedersen
{"title":"Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives.","authors":"Jacob Jorem, Reidun Førde, Tonje Lossius Husum, Jørgen Dahlberg, Reidar Pedersen","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Decision-making capacity (DMC) is key to capacity-based mental health laws. In 2017, Norway introduced a lack of DMC as an additional criterion for involuntary care and treatment to strengthen patient autonomy and reduce involuntary care. Health registry data reveal an initial reduction followed by rising involuntary care and treatment rates post-2017. Despite jurisdictions moving towards capacity-based mental health laws, little is known about their impact.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore the impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law governing involuntary care and treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted in 2018 with 60 purposively sampled stakeholders, including patients, families, health professionals and lawyers. Of these, 26 participated in individual follow-up interviews in 2022-23. The transcribed interviews were thematically analysed following Braun and Clarke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes emerged: (a) increased awareness of patient autonomy and improved patient involvement; (b) altered thresholds for involuntary admission and discharge and more challenging to help certain patient groups; (c) more responsibility for primary health services; and (d) increased family responsibility but unchanged involvement by health services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Introducing a capacity-based mental health law appears to raise awareness of patient autonomy, but its impact depends on an interplay of complex health, social and legal systems. Post-2017 changes, including rising involuntary care and treatment rates, higher thresholds for admissions and increased pressure on primary health services and families, may be influenced by several factors. These include implementation of decision-making capacity, legal interpretations, formal measures for care of non-resistant incompetent individuals, reduced in-patient bed availability, inadequate voluntary treatment options and societal developments. Further research is needed to better understand these changes and their causes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12001955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Decision-making capacity (DMC) is key to capacity-based mental health laws. In 2017, Norway introduced a lack of DMC as an additional criterion for involuntary care and treatment to strengthen patient autonomy and reduce involuntary care. Health registry data reveal an initial reduction followed by rising involuntary care and treatment rates post-2017. Despite jurisdictions moving towards capacity-based mental health laws, little is known about their impact.

Aims: To explore the impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law governing involuntary care and treatment.

Method: Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted in 2018 with 60 purposively sampled stakeholders, including patients, families, health professionals and lawyers. Of these, 26 participated in individual follow-up interviews in 2022-23. The transcribed interviews were thematically analysed following Braun and Clarke.

Results: Four themes emerged: (a) increased awareness of patient autonomy and improved patient involvement; (b) altered thresholds for involuntary admission and discharge and more challenging to help certain patient groups; (c) more responsibility for primary health services; and (d) increased family responsibility but unchanged involvement by health services.

Conclusions: Introducing a capacity-based mental health law appears to raise awareness of patient autonomy, but its impact depends on an interplay of complex health, social and legal systems. Post-2017 changes, including rising involuntary care and treatment rates, higher thresholds for admissions and increased pressure on primary health services and families, may be influenced by several factors. These include implementation of decision-making capacity, legal interpretations, formal measures for care of non-resistant incompetent individuals, reduced in-patient bed availability, inadequate voluntary treatment options and societal developments. Further research is needed to better understand these changes and their causes.

在挪威实行基于能力的精神卫生法的影响:多方利益攸关方观点的定性探讨。
背景:决策能力(DMC)是基于能力的心理卫生法的关键。2017年,挪威将缺乏DMC作为非自愿护理和治疗的额外标准,以加强患者自主权并减少非自愿护理。健康登记数据显示,2017年后,非自愿护理和治疗率开始下降,随后上升。尽管司法管辖区正在朝着以能力为基础的精神卫生法发展,但人们对其影响知之甚少。目的:探讨采用以能力为基础的精神卫生法管理非自愿护理和治疗的影响。方法:2018年对60名利益相关者进行半结构化访谈和焦点小组调查,其中包括患者、家属、卫生专业人员和律师。其中,26人参加了2022-23年的个人随访访谈。采访记录在布劳恩和克拉克之后进行了主题分析。结果:出现了四个主题:(a)提高了患者自主意识,改善了患者参与;(b)改变了非自愿入院和出院的门槛,对帮助某些患者群体更具挑战性;(c)加强对初级保健服务的责任;(d)家庭责任增加,但保健服务的参与没有改变。结论:引入以能力为基础的精神卫生法似乎提高了对患者自主的认识,但其影响取决于复杂的卫生、社会和法律系统的相互作用。2017年后的变化,包括非自愿护理和治疗率上升、入院门槛提高以及初级卫生服务和家庭压力增加,可能受到几个因素的影响。这些挑战包括决策能力的实施、法律解释、照顾无抵抗能力的无能力个人的正式措施、住院床位减少、自愿治疗选择不足以及社会发展。需要进一步的研究来更好地了解这些变化及其原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信