Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Neuroimaging Biomarkers and Cognition in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
{"title":"Effects of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure on Neuroimaging Biomarkers and Cognition in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Huajun Xu, Yupu Liu, Chenyang Li, Xinyi Li, Li Shen, Hui Wang, Feng Liu, Juanjuan Zou, Yunyan Xia, Weijun Huang, Yuenan Liu, Zhenfei Gao, Yiqun Fu, Fan Wang, Shujian Huang, Zhiyuan Song, Fan Song, Yiqing Gao, Yu Peng, Jianyin Zou, Huaming Zhu, Suru Liu, Linpeng Li, Xiaoyue Zhu, Yuanping Xiong, Yuli Hu, Jiaxin Yang, Yuehua Li, Feng Gao, Qihao Guo, Hengye Huang, Weituo Zhang, Jiping Li, Yanqing Chen, Pin Dong, Jun Yang, Jingrong Lv, Peihua Wang, Yiyuan Sun, Biyun Qian, Kristine Yaffe, Jian Guan, Hongliang Yi, Yue Leng, Shankai Yin","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202406-1170OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with cognitive impairment. The effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance among middle-aged patients with OSA and normal cognition remain unclear. <b>Objectives:</b> To investigate the effects of CPAP therapy over 12 months on neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we randomly assigned 148 participants with normal cognition and an apnea-hypopnea index ⩾15/h into two groups: patients receiving CPAP with best supportive care (BSC); and patients receiving BSC alone. The primary endpoint was Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 6 months after enrollment. The secondary endpoints were intranetwork functional connectivity (FC) of default mode network (DMN) and cortical thickness assessed by functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging, other neuroimaging biomarkers, and neurobehavioral tests. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Between 2017 and 2021, 148 patients were recruited from five hospitals. Linear mixed models showed that there was no significant difference in MoCA scores at 6 months between the CPAP and BSC groups (difference, -0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.72 to 0.65; <i>P</i> = 0.91). However, there were significant differences in the FC of DMN (difference, -13.73; 95% CI, -23.40 to -4.06; <i>P</i> = 0.01) and cortical thickness (difference, -0.06 mm; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01 mm; <i>P</i> = 0.02) between CPAP and BSC groups at 6 months after treatment. No serious adverse events occurred. <b>Conclusions:</b> CPAP improved cortical thickness and FC of DMN, suggesting that patients with OSA may recover from brain atrophic processes after CPAP treatment. However, no improvement in MoCA was found. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02886156).</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"628-636"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202406-1170OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with cognitive impairment. The effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance among middle-aged patients with OSA and normal cognition remain unclear. Objectives: To investigate the effects of CPAP therapy over 12 months on neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive performance. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we randomly assigned 148 participants with normal cognition and an apnea-hypopnea index ⩾15/h into two groups: patients receiving CPAP with best supportive care (BSC); and patients receiving BSC alone. The primary endpoint was Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score at 6 months after enrollment. The secondary endpoints were intranetwork functional connectivity (FC) of default mode network (DMN) and cortical thickness assessed by functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging, other neuroimaging biomarkers, and neurobehavioral tests. Measurements and Main Results: Between 2017 and 2021, 148 patients were recruited from five hospitals. Linear mixed models showed that there was no significant difference in MoCA scores at 6 months between the CPAP and BSC groups (difference, -0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.72 to 0.65; P = 0.91). However, there were significant differences in the FC of DMN (difference, -13.73; 95% CI, -23.40 to -4.06; P = 0.01) and cortical thickness (difference, -0.06 mm; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.01 mm; P = 0.02) between CPAP and BSC groups at 6 months after treatment. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: CPAP improved cortical thickness and FC of DMN, suggesting that patients with OSA may recover from brain atrophic processes after CPAP treatment. However, no improvement in MoCA was found. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02886156).
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences.
A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.