The Association Between Cognitive Functioning and Depression Severity: A Multiwave Longitudinal Remote Assessment Study

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Marcos Ross-Adelman, George Aalbers, Faith Matcham, Sara Simblett, Daniel Leightley, Sara Siddi, Josep M. Haro, Carolin Oetzmann, Vaibhav A. Narayan, Matthew Hotopf, Inez Myin-Germeys, Peter de Jonge, Femke Lamers, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
{"title":"The Association Between Cognitive Functioning and Depression Severity: A Multiwave Longitudinal Remote Assessment Study","authors":"Marcos Ross-Adelman,&nbsp;George Aalbers,&nbsp;Faith Matcham,&nbsp;Sara Simblett,&nbsp;Daniel Leightley,&nbsp;Sara Siddi,&nbsp;Josep M. Haro,&nbsp;Carolin Oetzmann,&nbsp;Vaibhav A. Narayan,&nbsp;Matthew Hotopf,&nbsp;Inez Myin-Germeys,&nbsp;Peter de Jonge,&nbsp;Femke Lamers,&nbsp;Brenda W. J. H. Penninx","doi":"10.1155/da/1509978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Cognitive difficulties are prevalent in depression and are linked to various negative life outcomes such as psychosocial impairment, absenteeism, lower chance of recovery or remission, and overall poor quality of life. Thus, assessing cognitive functioning over time is key to expanding our understanding of depression. Recent methodological advances and the ubiquity of smartphones enable remote assessment of cognitive functioning through smartphone-based tasks and surveys. However, the association of smartphone-based assessments of cognitive functioning to depression severity remains underexplored. Using a dedicated mobile application for assessing cognitive functioning (THINC-it), we investigate within- and between-person associations between performance-based (attention, working memory, processing speed, attention switching) and self-report measures of cognitive functioning with depression severity in 475 participants from the RADAR-MDD (Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse-Major Depressive Disorder) cohort study (<i>t</i> = 2036 observations over an average of 14 months of follow-up). At the between-person level, we found stronger negative associations between the self-reported cognitive functioning measure and depression severity (<i>β</i> = −0.649, <i>p</i>  &lt; 0.001) than between the performance-based measures and depression severity (<i>β</i>s = −0.220 to −0.349, <i>p</i><sub>s</sub>  &lt; 0.001). At the within-person level, we found negative associations between depression severity and the self-reported measure (<i>β</i> = −0.223, <i>p</i>  &lt; 0.001), processing speed (<i>β</i> = −0.026, <i>p</i> = 0.032) and attention (<i>β</i> = −0.037, <i>p</i> = 0.003). These findings suggest that although THINC-it could adequately and remotely detect poorer cognitive performance in people with higher depressive symptoms, it was not capable of tracking within-person change over time. Nonetheless, repeatedly measuring self-reports of cognitive functioning showed more potential in tracking within-person changes in depression severity, underscoring their relevance for patient monitoring.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1509978","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1509978","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive difficulties are prevalent in depression and are linked to various negative life outcomes such as psychosocial impairment, absenteeism, lower chance of recovery or remission, and overall poor quality of life. Thus, assessing cognitive functioning over time is key to expanding our understanding of depression. Recent methodological advances and the ubiquity of smartphones enable remote assessment of cognitive functioning through smartphone-based tasks and surveys. However, the association of smartphone-based assessments of cognitive functioning to depression severity remains underexplored. Using a dedicated mobile application for assessing cognitive functioning (THINC-it), we investigate within- and between-person associations between performance-based (attention, working memory, processing speed, attention switching) and self-report measures of cognitive functioning with depression severity in 475 participants from the RADAR-MDD (Remote Assessment of Disease and Relapse-Major Depressive Disorder) cohort study (t = 2036 observations over an average of 14 months of follow-up). At the between-person level, we found stronger negative associations between the self-reported cognitive functioning measure and depression severity (β = −0.649, p  < 0.001) than between the performance-based measures and depression severity (βs = −0.220 to −0.349, ps  < 0.001). At the within-person level, we found negative associations between depression severity and the self-reported measure (β = −0.223, p  < 0.001), processing speed (β = −0.026, p = 0.032) and attention (β = −0.037, p = 0.003). These findings suggest that although THINC-it could adequately and remotely detect poorer cognitive performance in people with higher depressive symptoms, it was not capable of tracking within-person change over time. Nonetheless, repeatedly measuring self-reports of cognitive functioning showed more potential in tracking within-person changes in depression severity, underscoring their relevance for patient monitoring.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信