Echocardiographic Evaluation of Indices of Severity of Pulmonary Stenosis in Dogs: Reproducibility and Effects of General Anesthesia

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Evan S. Ross, Lance C. Visser, Lalida Tantisuwat, Khursheed Mama, Brianna M. Potter, Brian A. Scansen
{"title":"Echocardiographic Evaluation of Indices of Severity of Pulmonary Stenosis in Dogs: Reproducibility and Effects of General Anesthesia","authors":"Evan S. Ross,&nbsp;Lance C. Visser,&nbsp;Lalida Tantisuwat,&nbsp;Khursheed Mama,&nbsp;Brianna M. Potter,&nbsp;Brian A. Scansen","doi":"10.1111/jvim.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The effects of general anesthesia (GA) on less flow-dependent (velocity ratio, velocity time integral [VTI] ratio and indexed pulmonary valve area [iPVA]) and flow-dependent (mean [PVmeanPG] and maximum pressure gradient [PVmaxPG]) indices of severity of pulmonary stenosis (PS) are unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Determine the effects of GA on indices of severity of PS in dogs undergoing an interventional procedure (IP). Determine the reproducibility of indices of severity of PS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-nine dogs with PS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective cross-sectional study. Five repeated echocardiograms were performed over 3 days. Day 1: two echocardiograms were performed by 2 different operators. Day 2: echocardiograms were performed before and after GA but before IP. Day 3: an echocardiogram was performed after the IP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>After GA, median (IQR) cardiac index (2.1 [1.6–2.6] L/min/m<sup>2</sup>), PVmeanPG (45.0 [26.0–55.2] mmHg), PVmaxPG (76.6 [46.6–100.3] mmHg) were decreased (<i>p</i> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\le 0 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.001) compared to before GA (2.8 [2.2–3.0] L/min/m<sup>2</sup>, 55.9 [47.6–73.1] mmHg, 96.1 [81.6–127.0] mmHg, respectively). There were no differences (<i>p</i> <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≥</mo>\n <mn>0</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\ge 0 $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>.35) in velocity ratio, VTI ratio, or iPVA after GA. Intra-operator and inter-operator coefficients of variation (95% CI) were highest for iPVA (13.8% [10.4–18.4] and 13.5% [11.0–18.4], respectively) and lowest for velocity ratio (9.2% [7.7–12.3] and 9.3% [7.7–12.4], respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>PVmeanPG and PVmaxPG might be misleading in states of reduced flow. An integrative assessment of severity of PS that includes less flow-dependent indices is recommended. Reproducibility of indices of severity of PS should be considered when re-evaluating dogs with PS.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.70003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The effects of general anesthesia (GA) on less flow-dependent (velocity ratio, velocity time integral [VTI] ratio and indexed pulmonary valve area [iPVA]) and flow-dependent (mean [PVmeanPG] and maximum pressure gradient [PVmaxPG]) indices of severity of pulmonary stenosis (PS) are unclear.

Objectives

Determine the effects of GA on indices of severity of PS in dogs undergoing an interventional procedure (IP). Determine the reproducibility of indices of severity of PS.

Animals

Thirty-nine dogs with PS.

Methods

Prospective cross-sectional study. Five repeated echocardiograms were performed over 3 days. Day 1: two echocardiograms were performed by 2 different operators. Day 2: echocardiograms were performed before and after GA but before IP. Day 3: an echocardiogram was performed after the IP.

Results

After GA, median (IQR) cardiac index (2.1 [1.6–2.6] L/min/m2), PVmeanPG (45.0 [26.0–55.2] mmHg), PVmaxPG (76.6 [46.6–100.3] mmHg) were decreased (p 0 $$ \le 0 $$ .001) compared to before GA (2.8 [2.2–3.0] L/min/m2, 55.9 [47.6–73.1] mmHg, 96.1 [81.6–127.0] mmHg, respectively). There were no differences (p 0 $$ \ge 0 $$ .35) in velocity ratio, VTI ratio, or iPVA after GA. Intra-operator and inter-operator coefficients of variation (95% CI) were highest for iPVA (13.8% [10.4–18.4] and 13.5% [11.0–18.4], respectively) and lowest for velocity ratio (9.2% [7.7–12.3] and 9.3% [7.7–12.4], respectively).

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

PVmeanPG and PVmaxPG might be misleading in states of reduced flow. An integrative assessment of severity of PS that includes less flow-dependent indices is recommended. Reproducibility of indices of severity of PS should be considered when re-evaluating dogs with PS.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信