Fish Community Structure and Habitat Complexity in Restored and Natural Eelgrass Meadows

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Julia Castro-Fernández, Jorge Terrados, Hilmar Hinz, Inés Castejón-Silvo, Per-Olav Moksnes, Eduardo Infantes
{"title":"Fish Community Structure and Habitat Complexity in Restored and Natural Eelgrass Meadows","authors":"Julia Castro-Fernández,&nbsp;Jorge Terrados,&nbsp;Hilmar Hinz,&nbsp;Inés Castejón-Silvo,&nbsp;Per-Olav Moksnes,&nbsp;Eduardo Infantes","doi":"10.1002/aqc.70092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Seagrass meadows serve as nursery and permanent habitat for numerous fish species—an ecosystem function influenced by structural complexity. Rapid seagrass loss over recent decades has promoted restoration efforts aimed at recovering meadows and their ecological functions. This study assesses the restoration of habitat structural complexity and associated fish communities in two replanted eelgrass (<i>Zostera marina</i>) meadows on the west coast of Sweden, planted with a 2-year difference and comparing them to the inner and edge areas of natural meadows and unvegetated sandy areas. Eelgrass habitat structural complexity was assessed from seagrass samples collected to estimate shoot densities, shoot biomass, and canopy height of the meadows. Fish communities were assessed using two methods: diver-operated stereo-video transects, and traditional underwater visual census, testing the efficiency of both techniques. The two assessed methods produced similar results that sampled canopy-associated species well but were less accurate for cryptic bottom-dwelling species inside eelgrass meadows. Results indicated that structural complexity was statistically lower in the 2-year replanted area (Askerön) compared to the reference meadow, but in the 4-year replanted area (Gåsö), no significant differences were observed between the restored and reference meadows. Moreover, no differences were observed between the reference and restored meadows for canopy-associated fish species in Gåsö, indicating that the recovery of the habitat function was already underway. However, results from Askerön were inconclusive. Thus, despite rapid eelgrass growth, the recovery of ecosystem function and of the capacity to provide ecosystem services following seagrass replanting is not always immediate and may be dependent on factors such as time after restoration, environmental factors (e.g., water quality) or landscape configuration (e.g., meadow fragmentation, vicinity to natural meadows). A comprehensive understanding of how fish communities respond to seagrass restoration is necessary to effectively scale the restoration efforts.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55493,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","volume":"35 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aqc.70092","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seagrass meadows serve as nursery and permanent habitat for numerous fish species—an ecosystem function influenced by structural complexity. Rapid seagrass loss over recent decades has promoted restoration efforts aimed at recovering meadows and their ecological functions. This study assesses the restoration of habitat structural complexity and associated fish communities in two replanted eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows on the west coast of Sweden, planted with a 2-year difference and comparing them to the inner and edge areas of natural meadows and unvegetated sandy areas. Eelgrass habitat structural complexity was assessed from seagrass samples collected to estimate shoot densities, shoot biomass, and canopy height of the meadows. Fish communities were assessed using two methods: diver-operated stereo-video transects, and traditional underwater visual census, testing the efficiency of both techniques. The two assessed methods produced similar results that sampled canopy-associated species well but were less accurate for cryptic bottom-dwelling species inside eelgrass meadows. Results indicated that structural complexity was statistically lower in the 2-year replanted area (Askerön) compared to the reference meadow, but in the 4-year replanted area (Gåsö), no significant differences were observed between the restored and reference meadows. Moreover, no differences were observed between the reference and restored meadows for canopy-associated fish species in Gåsö, indicating that the recovery of the habitat function was already underway. However, results from Askerön were inconclusive. Thus, despite rapid eelgrass growth, the recovery of ecosystem function and of the capacity to provide ecosystem services following seagrass replanting is not always immediate and may be dependent on factors such as time after restoration, environmental factors (e.g., water quality) or landscape configuration (e.g., meadow fragmentation, vicinity to natural meadows). A comprehensive understanding of how fish communities respond to seagrass restoration is necessary to effectively scale the restoration efforts.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems is an international journal dedicated to publishing original papers that relate specifically to freshwater, brackish or marine habitats and encouraging work that spans these ecosystems. This journal provides a forum in which all aspects of the conservation of aquatic biological resources can be presented and discussed, enabling greater cooperation and efficiency in solving problems in aquatic resource conservation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信