Efficiency of Plant Biomass Processing Pathways for Long-Term Soil Carbon Storage

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Sonja G. Keel, Alice Budai, Lars Elsgaard, Brieuc Hardy, Florent Levavasseur, Liang Zhi, Claudio Mondini, César Plaza, Jens Leifeld
{"title":"Efficiency of Plant Biomass Processing Pathways for Long-Term Soil Carbon Storage","authors":"Sonja G. Keel,&nbsp;Alice Budai,&nbsp;Lars Elsgaard,&nbsp;Brieuc Hardy,&nbsp;Florent Levavasseur,&nbsp;Liang Zhi,&nbsp;Claudio Mondini,&nbsp;César Plaza,&nbsp;Jens Leifeld","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The potential for soil carbon (C) sequestration strongly depends on the availability of plant biomass inputs, making its efficient use critical for designing net zero strategies. Here, we compared different biomass processing pathways and quantified the long-term effect of the resulting exogenous organic materials (EOMs) to that of direct plant residue input on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. We estimated C losses during feed digestion of plant material, storage of manure, composting and anaerobic digestion of plant material and manure, and pyrolysis of plant material, using values reported in the literature. We then applied an extended version of the widely used SOC model RothC with newly developed parameters to quantify the SOC storage efficiency, that is, accounting for both processing losses off-site and decomposition losses of the different EOMs in the soil. Based on simulations for a 39-year long cropland trial in Switzerland, we found that the SOC storage efficiency is higher for plant material directly added to the soil (16%) compared to digestate and manure (3% and 5%, respectively). For compost, the effect was less clear (2% ̶ 18%; mean: 10%) due to a high uncertainty in C-losses during composting. In the case of biochar, 43% of the initial plant C remained in the soil, due to its high intrinsic stability despite C-losses of 54% during pyrolysis. To provide robust recommendations for optimal biomass use, it is essential to consider additional factors such as nutrient availability of EOMs, environmental impacts of soil application, and life cycle assessments for the entire production processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"76 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejss.70074","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejss.70074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential for soil carbon (C) sequestration strongly depends on the availability of plant biomass inputs, making its efficient use critical for designing net zero strategies. Here, we compared different biomass processing pathways and quantified the long-term effect of the resulting exogenous organic materials (EOMs) to that of direct plant residue input on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. We estimated C losses during feed digestion of plant material, storage of manure, composting and anaerobic digestion of plant material and manure, and pyrolysis of plant material, using values reported in the literature. We then applied an extended version of the widely used SOC model RothC with newly developed parameters to quantify the SOC storage efficiency, that is, accounting for both processing losses off-site and decomposition losses of the different EOMs in the soil. Based on simulations for a 39-year long cropland trial in Switzerland, we found that the SOC storage efficiency is higher for plant material directly added to the soil (16%) compared to digestate and manure (3% and 5%, respectively). For compost, the effect was less clear (2% ̶ 18%; mean: 10%) due to a high uncertainty in C-losses during composting. In the case of biochar, 43% of the initial plant C remained in the soil, due to its high intrinsic stability despite C-losses of 54% during pyrolysis. To provide robust recommendations for optimal biomass use, it is essential to consider additional factors such as nutrient availability of EOMs, environmental impacts of soil application, and life cycle assessments for the entire production processes.

Abstract Image

植物生物量处理途径对土壤长期碳储存的效率
土壤碳(C)固存的潜力在很大程度上取决于植物生物量输入的可用性,因此有效利用其对设计净零战略至关重要。在此,我们比较了不同的生物质加工途径,并量化了所产生的外源有机物质(EOMs)对土壤有机碳(SOC)储量的长期影响。我们使用文献报道的值估算了植物材料的饲料消化、粪便储存、植物材料和粪便的堆肥和厌氧消化以及植物材料热解过程中的C损失。然后,我们应用广泛使用的有机碳模型RothC的扩展版本,使用新开发的参数来量化有机碳储存效率,即考虑土壤中不同EOMs的场外加工损失和分解损失。基于对瑞士39年农田试验的模拟,我们发现直接添加到土壤中的植物材料的有机碳储存效率(16%)高于消化液和粪便(分别为3%和5%)。对于堆肥,效果不太明显(2% - 18%;平均:10%),这是由于堆肥过程中碳损失的高度不确定性。以生物炭为例,尽管热解过程中碳损失了54%,但由于生物炭具有很高的内在稳定性,因此43%的初始植物碳留在了土壤中。为了提供最佳生物量利用的可靠建议,必须考虑其他因素,如EOMs的养分有效性、土壤施用的环境影响以及整个生产过程的生命周期评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信