Prognostic Impact of Oncogenic Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Alterations in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors in a Real-World Setting

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1002/cam4.70546
Levon Demirdjian, Spyros Triantos, Kristopher Standish, Shibu Thomas, Qi Xia, Jiarui Zhang, Joel Greshock, Julie Paone, Paige Sheridan, Shubham Pant, Christophe Massard, David A. Reardon, Yohann Loriot, Martin Schuler, Hussein Sweiti
{"title":"Prognostic Impact of Oncogenic Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Alterations in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors in a Real-World Setting","authors":"Levon Demirdjian,&nbsp;Spyros Triantos,&nbsp;Kristopher Standish,&nbsp;Shibu Thomas,&nbsp;Qi Xia,&nbsp;Jiarui Zhang,&nbsp;Joel Greshock,&nbsp;Julie Paone,&nbsp;Paige Sheridan,&nbsp;Shubham Pant,&nbsp;Christophe Massard,&nbsp;David A. Reardon,&nbsp;Yohann Loriot,&nbsp;Martin Schuler,&nbsp;Hussein Sweiti","doi":"10.1002/cam4.70546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Somatic <i>FGFR</i> gene alterations (<i>FGFRalt</i>) may act as oncogenic drivers across several cancers. The prognostic impact of <i>FGFRalt</i> in solid tumors is not fully understood. We assessed the prognostic impact of <i>FGFRalt</i> on overall survival (OS) in a tumor-agnostic real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid tumors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective, observational, comparative cohort analysis that used data from a nationwide de-identified clinico-genomic database. Patients were included if they had advanced/metastatic disease, were aged ≥ 18 years at the time of diagnosis, had evidence of genomic testing for <i>FGFRalt</i>, and had initiated first-line systemic therapy for their cancer. Patients without <i>FGFR</i> alterations (<i>FGFRneg</i>) were matched 3:1 with patients with <i>FGFRalt</i> using a combination of exact matching on tumor type and Mahalanobis-distance matching on selected clinical confounders. The primary endpoint was OS from time of initiation of first-line therapy in patients with <i>FGFRalt</i> versus <i>FGFRneg</i>. To further mitigate bias, delayed entry models and covariate-adjusted stratified Cox models were implemented.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The final cohort included 1012 patients (253 <i>FGFRalt</i>, 759 <i>FGFRneg</i>), across 30 tumor types. There were no significant differences in real-world OS from first-line therapy between <i>FGFRalt</i> and <i>FGFRneg</i> groups (hazard ratio 0.97; <i>p</i> = 0.78). Median OS from initiation of first-line therapy was 1.13 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.52) and 1.01 years (0.89–1.15) for the <i>FGFRalt</i> and <i>FGFRneg</i> groups, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this matched-cohort real-world analysis, presence of <i>FGFRalt</i> had no impact on the prognosis of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving standard-of-care treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":139,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Medicine","volume":"14 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cam4.70546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cam4.70546","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Somatic FGFR gene alterations (FGFRalt) may act as oncogenic drivers across several cancers. The prognostic impact of FGFRalt in solid tumors is not fully understood. We assessed the prognostic impact of FGFRalt on overall survival (OS) in a tumor-agnostic real-world cohort of patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational, comparative cohort analysis that used data from a nationwide de-identified clinico-genomic database. Patients were included if they had advanced/metastatic disease, were aged ≥ 18 years at the time of diagnosis, had evidence of genomic testing for FGFRalt, and had initiated first-line systemic therapy for their cancer. Patients without FGFR alterations (FGFRneg) were matched 3:1 with patients with FGFRalt using a combination of exact matching on tumor type and Mahalanobis-distance matching on selected clinical confounders. The primary endpoint was OS from time of initiation of first-line therapy in patients with FGFRalt versus FGFRneg. To further mitigate bias, delayed entry models and covariate-adjusted stratified Cox models were implemented.

Results

The final cohort included 1012 patients (253 FGFRalt, 759 FGFRneg), across 30 tumor types. There were no significant differences in real-world OS from first-line therapy between FGFRalt and FGFRneg groups (hazard ratio 0.97; p = 0.78). Median OS from initiation of first-line therapy was 1.13 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–1.52) and 1.01 years (0.89–1.15) for the FGFRalt and FGFRneg groups, respectively.

Conclusions

In this matched-cohort real-world analysis, presence of FGFRalt had no impact on the prognosis of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving standard-of-care treatment.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Medicine
Cancer Medicine ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
907
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Medicine is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research from global biomedical researchers across the cancer sciences. The journal will consider submissions from all oncologic specialties, including, but not limited to, the following areas: Clinical Cancer Research Translational research ∙ clinical trials ∙ chemotherapy ∙ radiation therapy ∙ surgical therapy ∙ clinical observations ∙ clinical guidelines ∙ genetic consultation ∙ ethical considerations Cancer Biology: Molecular biology ∙ cellular biology ∙ molecular genetics ∙ genomics ∙ immunology ∙ epigenetics ∙ metabolic studies ∙ proteomics ∙ cytopathology ∙ carcinogenesis ∙ drug discovery and delivery. Cancer Prevention: Behavioral science ∙ psychosocial studies ∙ screening ∙ nutrition ∙ epidemiology and prevention ∙ community outreach. Bioinformatics: Gene expressions profiles ∙ gene regulation networks ∙ genome bioinformatics ∙ pathwayanalysis ∙ prognostic biomarkers. Cancer Medicine publishes original research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信