Review of One Welfare by Rebeca García Pinillos

Donald M. Broom
{"title":"Review of One Welfare by Rebeca García Pinillos","authors":"Donald M. Broom","doi":"10.1002/aro2.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Attitudes to the position of humans in the world, the status of nonhuman animals, and ideas about animal welfare have developed rapidly in recent years. This is partly because of a change in world economics, as consumers now have more power and dictate what they will buy, and partly because of advances in knowledge about the biology of all animals, including humans and the increasing damage to the world that is the result of human action [<span>1</span>].</p><p>The economic change is from a push economy, driven largely by producers, to a pull economy, driven largely by consumers. Consumers now wish to avoid products and actions that they consider to be morally wrong. More and more they are refusing to buy anything that is not sustainably produced. A system or procedure is sustainable if it is acceptable now and if its expected future effects are acceptable, particularly in relation to resource availability, consequences of functioning, and morality of action [<span>2</span>]. Modern consumers require transparency in commercial and government activities and take account of the ethics of production when they evaluate product quality. There are many components of sustainability and all should be taken into account but, for food products, many consumers in countries where surveys have been conducted consider the welfare of animals used in or affected by production to be a very important part of sustainability. For example, consumers are refusing to buy pig meat if the sows have been kept in stalls or tethers, eggs or egg products from hens in battery cages, or crop products if many bees, birds, or people have died as a result of herbicide or pesticide use.</p><p>The concepts of one biology, one health, and one welfare emphasize that each of these words mean the same whether the subject of the biology, health, or welfare is human or nonhuman [<span>3, 4</span>]. Moral action is not just about humans but concerns all sentient animals, and to some extent, all living beings. In the introduction to her book, Rebeca Garcia Pinillos emphasizes these points and says “One Welfare is a concept that encompasses, in a multidimensional way, a number of areas, including: the problems of animal production, workers and the impact on the environment of livestock farms; the reduction of violence across the world; and the connection between poor animal and human welfare states and how improved animal welfare can help improve human welfare.” Monique Eloit, Director General of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), in a foreword to this book, has emphasized that the book develops further the “now well accepted” concept of One Health and “with the adoption of the OIE Global Animal Welfare Strategy during the 85th OIE General Session in May 2017, the OIE has specifically acknowledged the importance of multi-stakeholder and interdisciplinary approaches to animal welfare, and integrated this into our work”.</p><p>The extent to which scientific studies of welfare in a range of species are interconnected is the central theme of this book. Section topics include: the connections between animal and human abuse and neglect, the social implications of improved animal welfare, and the links between health, welfare, food security, and sustainability in terms of human interventions and the kinds of connections. Twenty case studies are used to exemplify these.</p><p>In order to utilize and understand all of this information, the meaning of the various concepts has to be clear. Biology is the study of living organisms, and their products welfare is the state of an individual as regards its attempts to cope with its environment, and health is the state of an individual as regards its attempts to cope with pathology. Welfare, like health, is a term that refers to individual animals and is scientifically measurable. For collections of individual humans or other species there can be accurate reference to the mean health or the mean welfare in the group. It is not scientifically accurate to refer to the health of a country or of the environment. However, it is important to consider how an environment affects the typical or mean health of individuals and how the health affects the stability of populations and other characteristics of environments. Wellbeing is best considered as a synonym of welfare. Quality of life is assessed in the same way as welfare but the term is not normally used for short time scales. As the author states in the introduction to the book,“ Health is an important part of welfare.” Health is not something separate from welfare. The coping systems that are involved in coping with the individual's environment have mental and physical aspects. Feelings and emotions are coping mechanisms, as are the immune system, wound healing systems, and many other physiological and behavioral mechanisms. Coping with pathology is an aspect of coping with the whole environment of the individual and its coping systems. A wide range of problems in life, responses to these, and positive responses to life are discussed in this book.</p><p>The scientific assessment of welfare has developed rapidly in the last 40 years. Some studies concern short-term situations and others long-term. The measures may indicate positive aspects of welfare or negative aspects but it is the net welfare, the balance between the positive and the negative which has to be determined during or after measurement. Many examples of situations where the welfare of individuals is measured are described in this book. The measurements are almost the same for humans and for other animal species and it is explained how those who study welfare in one species can learn from those studying another species. The fact that, for humans and all animal studied by humans, positive welfare often improves immune system function and other mechanisms so that the risk of adverse effects of pathogens is reduced, is a striking example of the similarities across species and the desirability of cooperation among experts on mental disorders, physical disorders, and the promotion of happiness in all species. The main message of this book is of wide general importance in the world.</p><p><b>Donald M. Broom</b>: Writing—original draft; writing—review &amp; editing; conceptualization.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":100086,"journal":{"name":"Animal Research and One Health","volume":"3 1","pages":"143-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/aro2.78","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Research and One Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aro2.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attitudes to the position of humans in the world, the status of nonhuman animals, and ideas about animal welfare have developed rapidly in recent years. This is partly because of a change in world economics, as consumers now have more power and dictate what they will buy, and partly because of advances in knowledge about the biology of all animals, including humans and the increasing damage to the world that is the result of human action [1].

The economic change is from a push economy, driven largely by producers, to a pull economy, driven largely by consumers. Consumers now wish to avoid products and actions that they consider to be morally wrong. More and more they are refusing to buy anything that is not sustainably produced. A system or procedure is sustainable if it is acceptable now and if its expected future effects are acceptable, particularly in relation to resource availability, consequences of functioning, and morality of action [2]. Modern consumers require transparency in commercial and government activities and take account of the ethics of production when they evaluate product quality. There are many components of sustainability and all should be taken into account but, for food products, many consumers in countries where surveys have been conducted consider the welfare of animals used in or affected by production to be a very important part of sustainability. For example, consumers are refusing to buy pig meat if the sows have been kept in stalls or tethers, eggs or egg products from hens in battery cages, or crop products if many bees, birds, or people have died as a result of herbicide or pesticide use.

The concepts of one biology, one health, and one welfare emphasize that each of these words mean the same whether the subject of the biology, health, or welfare is human or nonhuman [3, 4]. Moral action is not just about humans but concerns all sentient animals, and to some extent, all living beings. In the introduction to her book, Rebeca Garcia Pinillos emphasizes these points and says “One Welfare is a concept that encompasses, in a multidimensional way, a number of areas, including: the problems of animal production, workers and the impact on the environment of livestock farms; the reduction of violence across the world; and the connection between poor animal and human welfare states and how improved animal welfare can help improve human welfare.” Monique Eloit, Director General of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), in a foreword to this book, has emphasized that the book develops further the “now well accepted” concept of One Health and “with the adoption of the OIE Global Animal Welfare Strategy during the 85th OIE General Session in May 2017, the OIE has specifically acknowledged the importance of multi-stakeholder and interdisciplinary approaches to animal welfare, and integrated this into our work”.

The extent to which scientific studies of welfare in a range of species are interconnected is the central theme of this book. Section topics include: the connections between animal and human abuse and neglect, the social implications of improved animal welfare, and the links between health, welfare, food security, and sustainability in terms of human interventions and the kinds of connections. Twenty case studies are used to exemplify these.

In order to utilize and understand all of this information, the meaning of the various concepts has to be clear. Biology is the study of living organisms, and their products welfare is the state of an individual as regards its attempts to cope with its environment, and health is the state of an individual as regards its attempts to cope with pathology. Welfare, like health, is a term that refers to individual animals and is scientifically measurable. For collections of individual humans or other species there can be accurate reference to the mean health or the mean welfare in the group. It is not scientifically accurate to refer to the health of a country or of the environment. However, it is important to consider how an environment affects the typical or mean health of individuals and how the health affects the stability of populations and other characteristics of environments. Wellbeing is best considered as a synonym of welfare. Quality of life is assessed in the same way as welfare but the term is not normally used for short time scales. As the author states in the introduction to the book,“ Health is an important part of welfare.” Health is not something separate from welfare. The coping systems that are involved in coping with the individual's environment have mental and physical aspects. Feelings and emotions are coping mechanisms, as are the immune system, wound healing systems, and many other physiological and behavioral mechanisms. Coping with pathology is an aspect of coping with the whole environment of the individual and its coping systems. A wide range of problems in life, responses to these, and positive responses to life are discussed in this book.

The scientific assessment of welfare has developed rapidly in the last 40 years. Some studies concern short-term situations and others long-term. The measures may indicate positive aspects of welfare or negative aspects but it is the net welfare, the balance between the positive and the negative which has to be determined during or after measurement. Many examples of situations where the welfare of individuals is measured are described in this book. The measurements are almost the same for humans and for other animal species and it is explained how those who study welfare in one species can learn from those studying another species. The fact that, for humans and all animal studied by humans, positive welfare often improves immune system function and other mechanisms so that the risk of adverse effects of pathogens is reduced, is a striking example of the similarities across species and the desirability of cooperation among experts on mental disorders, physical disorders, and the promotion of happiness in all species. The main message of this book is of wide general importance in the world.

Donald M. Broom: Writing—original draft; writing—review & editing; conceptualization.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Rebeca García Pinillos对一种福利的评论
近年来,人们对人类在世界上的地位、非人类动物的地位以及动物福利的看法发展迅速。这部分是由于世界经济的变化,消费者现在有更多的权力来决定他们要买什么,部分是由于对包括人类在内的所有动物的生物学知识的进步,以及人类行为对世界造成的日益严重的破坏。经济的变化是从主要由生产者推动的推动型经济转变为主要由消费者推动的拉动型经济。消费者现在希望避免他们认为不道德的产品和行为。他们越来越拒绝购买任何非可持续生产的东西。一个系统或程序是可持续的,如果它现在是可以接受的,如果它的预期未来的影响是可以接受的,特别是在资源的可用性、功能的后果和行为的道德方面。现代消费者要求商业和政府活动的透明度,并在评估产品质量时考虑到生产道德。可持续性有许多组成部分,都应该考虑在内,但对于食品,在进行调查的国家中,许多消费者认为,用于生产或受生产影响的动物的福利是可持续性的一个非常重要的组成部分。例如,如果母猪被关在猪栏里或拴在绳子上,消费者就会拒绝购买猪肉;如果母鸡的鸡蛋或蛋制品被关在电笼里;如果许多蜜蜂、鸟类或人因使用除草剂或杀虫剂而死亡,消费者就会拒绝购买农作物产品。一个生物学、一个健康和一个福利的概念强调,无论生物学、健康或福利的主体是人类还是非人类,这些词的含义都是一样的[3,4]。道德行为不仅与人类有关,而且与所有有知觉的动物有关,在某种程度上,与所有生物有关。雷贝卡·加西亚·皮尼洛斯在她的书的前言中强调了这些观点,并说:“一个福利是一个概念,以多维的方式涵盖了许多领域,包括:动物生产、工人和对牲畜农场环境的影响的问题;减少世界各地的暴力;以及贫穷的动物和人类福利国家之间的联系,以及改善动物福利如何有助于改善人类福利。”世界动物卫生组织(OIE)总干事Monique Eloit在本书的前言中强调,该书进一步发展了“现在已被广泛接受”的“同一个健康”概念,并且“随着2017年5月世界动物卫生组织第85届大会通过世界动物卫生组织全球动物福利战略,世界动物卫生组织特别认识到多方利益相关者和跨学科方法对动物福利的重要性,并将其纳入我们的工作”。在多大程度上,福利的科学研究在一系列物种是相互关联的是这本书的中心主题。部分主题包括:虐待和忽视动物与人类之间的联系,改善动物福利的社会影响,以及在人类干预和各种联系方面健康、福利、粮食安全和可持续性之间的联系。20个案例研究被用来举例说明这些。为了利用和理解所有这些信息,必须清楚各种概念的含义。生物学是对活的有机体的研究,它们的产品福利是个体试图应付其环境的状态,健康是个体试图应付病理的状态。福利和健康一样,是一个指动物个体的术语,是可以科学衡量的。对于个体人类或其他物种的集合,可以准确地参考群体中的平均健康或平均福利。从科学的角度讲,一个国家的健康或环境的健康是不准确的。然而,重要的是要考虑环境如何影响个人的典型或平均健康,以及健康如何影响人口的稳定性和环境的其他特征。幸福最好被认为是福利的同义词。生活质量的评估方法与福利相同,但该术语通常不用于短期尺度。正如作者在书的前言中所说,“健康是福利的重要组成部分。”健康和福利是分不开的。应对系统包括应对个人环境的心理和生理两方面。感觉和情绪是应对机制,就像免疫系统、伤口愈合系统和许多其他生理和行为机制一样。应对病理是应对整个个体环境及其应对系统的一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信