Does Warning Performance Vary Between Administrative Districts and Across Watersheds for Rapid Onset Flood Events? A Case Study of the 2021 Flood in Germany

IF 3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anna Heidenreich, Heather J. Murdock, Annegret H. Thieken
{"title":"Does Warning Performance Vary Between Administrative Districts and Across Watersheds for Rapid Onset Flood Events? A Case Study of the 2021 Flood in Germany","authors":"Anna Heidenreich,&nbsp;Heather J. Murdock,&nbsp;Annegret H. Thieken","doi":"10.1111/jfr3.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In July 2021, a flash flood event affected hilly watersheds in Western Germany and neighbouring countries. Many people reported being surprised by the event and in Germany, there were 190 fatalities recorded, pointing to failures in the flood early warning system. We analyze the warning situation based on the results of an online survey with 1351 participants from the most affected areas in two German federal states, Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP), and North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). Among other topics, the survey addressed whether and when residents received a flood warning and if they knew what to do in response to a flood. We look at differences in the performance of the warning system at the district level and at the watershed segment level from upstream to downstream. We find significant differences between the districts but also due to the location of districts within different federal states and the presence of operational flood forecasting systems. We find some differences between watershed segments; however, the severity of the flood is more important than location within the watershed. Results show that timely warnings through official channels based on operational flood forecasting can help close the warning gap for flash floods.</p>","PeriodicalId":49294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfr3.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Flood Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfr3.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In July 2021, a flash flood event affected hilly watersheds in Western Germany and neighbouring countries. Many people reported being surprised by the event and in Germany, there were 190 fatalities recorded, pointing to failures in the flood early warning system. We analyze the warning situation based on the results of an online survey with 1351 participants from the most affected areas in two German federal states, Rhineland-Palatinate (RLP), and North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW). Among other topics, the survey addressed whether and when residents received a flood warning and if they knew what to do in response to a flood. We look at differences in the performance of the warning system at the district level and at the watershed segment level from upstream to downstream. We find significant differences between the districts but also due to the location of districts within different federal states and the presence of operational flood forecasting systems. We find some differences between watershed segments; however, the severity of the flood is more important than location within the watershed. Results show that timely warnings through official channels based on operational flood forecasting can help close the warning gap for flash floods.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Flood Risk Management
Journal of Flood Risk Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-WATER RESOURCES
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
93
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Flood Risk Management provides an international platform for knowledge sharing in all areas related to flood risk. Its explicit aim is to disseminate ideas across the range of disciplines where flood related research is carried out and it provides content ranging from leading edge academic papers to applied content with the practitioner in mind. Readers and authors come from a wide background and include hydrologists, meteorologists, geographers, geomorphologists, conservationists, civil engineers, social scientists, policy makers, insurers and practitioners. They share an interest in managing the complex interactions between the many skills and disciplines that underpin the management of flood risk across the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信