Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three understory tree species in forests of the Mid-Atlantic U.S

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 FORESTRY
Trees Pub Date : 2025-02-26 DOI:10.1007/s00468-025-02611-3
Jessica L. Schedlbauer, Sarah Paynter
{"title":"Photosynthetic induction and sunfleck responses of three understory tree species in forests of the Mid-Atlantic U.S","authors":"Jessica L. Schedlbauer,&nbsp;Sarah Paynter","doi":"10.1007/s00468-025-02611-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Key message</h3><p>Photosynthetic induction was rapid in three shade-tolerant understory saplings, and surprisingly, native and non-native <i>Acer</i> species gained induction more quickly when exposed to sequential lightflecks, relative to constant saturating light.</p><h3>Abstract</h3><p>Growing regeneration mismatch between forest canopy and understory environments is evident in broadleaf forests of the eastern U.S., leading to novel understory forest composition. Three co-occurring shade-tolerant tree species in forest understories of southeastern Pennsylvania are the natives <i>Acer rubrum</i> and <i>Fagus grandifolia</i> and the non-native <i>Acer platanoides</i>. Physiological attributes contributing to these species’ relative success in the understory’s dynamic light environment are poorly characterized. Three saplings per species from three sites were sampled to examine photosynthetic induction and lightfleck responses. Predictors of photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (g<sub>s</sub>) during lightflecks were also examined. The rate and magnitude of photosynthetic induction were similar among species, with all gaining induction rapidly, as expected for shade-tolerant species. However, physiological strategies supporting induction responses varied by species, as <i>A. rubrum</i> had more responsive stomata and significantly lower stomatal limitation during induction, as well as significantly higher A/g<sub>s</sub> when fully induced. Surprisingly, lightfleck responses differed from induction responses for the two <i>Acer</i> species, both of which exhibited significantly greater cumulative carbon assimilation than when exposed to constant saturating light, particularly during short-duration lightflecks. Leaf nitrogen and g<sub>s</sub> were significant predictors of lightfleck responses, while species identity was not. Although induction gain under saturating light was rapid for all species, variable lightfleck responses favoring the <i>Acer</i> species provide an advantage given the intermittent nature of understory light availability. As eastern broadleaf forest composition continues to change in response to diverse pressures, the <i>Acer</i> species are well-positioned to persist.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":805,"journal":{"name":"Trees","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees","FirstCategoryId":"2","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00468-025-02611-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Key message

Photosynthetic induction was rapid in three shade-tolerant understory saplings, and surprisingly, native and non-native Acer species gained induction more quickly when exposed to sequential lightflecks, relative to constant saturating light.

Abstract

Growing regeneration mismatch between forest canopy and understory environments is evident in broadleaf forests of the eastern U.S., leading to novel understory forest composition. Three co-occurring shade-tolerant tree species in forest understories of southeastern Pennsylvania are the natives Acer rubrum and Fagus grandifolia and the non-native Acer platanoides. Physiological attributes contributing to these species’ relative success in the understory’s dynamic light environment are poorly characterized. Three saplings per species from three sites were sampled to examine photosynthetic induction and lightfleck responses. Predictors of photosynthesis (A) and stomatal conductance (gs) during lightflecks were also examined. The rate and magnitude of photosynthetic induction were similar among species, with all gaining induction rapidly, as expected for shade-tolerant species. However, physiological strategies supporting induction responses varied by species, as A. rubrum had more responsive stomata and significantly lower stomatal limitation during induction, as well as significantly higher A/gs when fully induced. Surprisingly, lightfleck responses differed from induction responses for the two Acer species, both of which exhibited significantly greater cumulative carbon assimilation than when exposed to constant saturating light, particularly during short-duration lightflecks. Leaf nitrogen and gs were significant predictors of lightfleck responses, while species identity was not. Although induction gain under saturating light was rapid for all species, variable lightfleck responses favoring the Acer species provide an advantage given the intermittent nature of understory light availability. As eastern broadleaf forest composition continues to change in response to diverse pressures, the Acer species are well-positioned to persist.

摘要在美国东部的阔叶林中,林冠和林下环境之间的生长再生不匹配现象非常明显,这导致了新的林下森林组成。宾夕法尼亚州东南部森林林下有三种共生耐阴树种,分别是本地的红叶复叶槭(Acer rubrum)和大叶榕(Fagus grandifolia),以及非本地的板叶槭(Acer platanoides)。这些树种在林下动态光照环境中取得相对成功的生理特征尚不十分明确。我们在三个地点对每个物种的三棵树苗进行了取样,以研究光合作用诱导和光斑反应。同时还研究了光斑期间光合作用(A)和气孔导度(gs)的预测因子。不同物种的光合诱导速度和幅度相似,所有物种都能迅速获得诱导,这也是耐阴物种所期望的。然而,支持诱导反应的生理策略因物种而异,红叶石蒜(A. rubrum)的气孔反应更灵敏,诱导期间的气孔限制显著较低,完全诱导时的A/gs显著较高。令人惊讶的是,两种槭树的光斑反应与诱导反应不同,它们的累积碳同化量都明显高于暴露在恒定饱和光照下时的碳同化量,尤其是在短时光斑期间。叶氮和 gs 是光斑反应的重要预测因子,而物种特征则不是。虽然所有物种在饱和光照下的诱导增益都很快,但考虑到林下光照的间歇性,不同的光斑反应有利于槭树种,这为槭树种提供了优势。随着东部阔叶林的组成在各种压力下不断变化,金合欢属树种在持续生存方面处于有利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trees
Trees 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Trees - Structure and Function publishes original articles on the physiology, biochemistry, functional anatomy, structure and ecology of trees and other woody plants. Also presented are articles concerned with pathology and technological problems, when they contribute to the basic understanding of structure and function of trees. In addition to original articles and short communications, the journal publishes reviews on selected topics concerning the structure and function of trees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信