Vasiliki Gkatsi;Bärbel van den Berg;Robert Vogt-Ardatjew;Frank Leferink
{"title":"Accurate Terminology and Uniform Methodology for Risk-Based EMC Engineering","authors":"Vasiliki Gkatsi;Bärbel van den Berg;Robert Vogt-Ardatjew;Frank Leferink","doi":"10.1109/LEMCPA.2024.3506855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Complying with the harmonized standards, that is, the principally applied rule-based electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) approach, does not always ensure EMC in practice. It is also just a presumption of conformity with the Essential Requirements, as stated in the European Directive for EMC. There is a need for a robust and durable methodology that accounts for factors which are not covered by current EMC standards: the risk-based EMC approach. The term “risk-based EMC” along with the associated terminology is commonly interpreted differently by manufacturers, technicians, and users. This letter clarifies this often misused terminology. First, a comparison between the so-far implemented rule-based EMC approach and the up-and-coming risk-based EMC approach is made. Then, the application of risk-based EMC via a risk management-based methodology is proposed. The goal of this research is to provide an overview on the need of risk-based EMC, list the so-far used (or misused) terminology, and create a common platform of risk management-based methodology, which will act as a guidance tool for EMC engineers when it comes to clear and consistent communication and application of EMC engineering.","PeriodicalId":100625,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","volume":"7 1","pages":"5-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10768197","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Letters on Electromagnetic Compatibility Practice and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10768197/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Complying with the harmonized standards, that is, the principally applied rule-based electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) approach, does not always ensure EMC in practice. It is also just a presumption of conformity with the Essential Requirements, as stated in the European Directive for EMC. There is a need for a robust and durable methodology that accounts for factors which are not covered by current EMC standards: the risk-based EMC approach. The term “risk-based EMC” along with the associated terminology is commonly interpreted differently by manufacturers, technicians, and users. This letter clarifies this often misused terminology. First, a comparison between the so-far implemented rule-based EMC approach and the up-and-coming risk-based EMC approach is made. Then, the application of risk-based EMC via a risk management-based methodology is proposed. The goal of this research is to provide an overview on the need of risk-based EMC, list the so-far used (or misused) terminology, and create a common platform of risk management-based methodology, which will act as a guidance tool for EMC engineers when it comes to clear and consistent communication and application of EMC engineering.