Buckling of circular cylindrical shells under external pressures - A critical review

IF 4 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Abubakr E.S. Musa , Mohamad M.K. Al-Ainieh , Mohammed A. Al-Osta
{"title":"Buckling of circular cylindrical shells under external pressures - A critical review","authors":"Abubakr E.S. Musa ,&nbsp;Mohamad M.K. Al-Ainieh ,&nbsp;Mohammed A. Al-Osta","doi":"10.1016/j.jcsr.2025.109439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Circular cylindrical shells are prone to buckling failure under different types of external pressure. These can include uniform lateral pressure, hydrostatic pressure (uniform lateral plus end pressure), and non-uniform wind pressure. The focus of this study is to thoroughly examine the available formulas for calculating the buckling pressure of circular cylindrical shells under these various types of external pressure and to assess their limitations. The study delves into a dozen of simplified formulas drawn from literature, discussing their derivations and comparing them with the exact solution of the problem to unveil their constraints. The study also investigates the correlations between uniform lateral and wind pressures, the effects of geometrical and material nonlinearities, and the impact of imperfections. The findings confirm that hydrostatic buckling pressure is consistently lower than lateral buckling pressure, and the conditions under which the difference between the two is negligible have been refined. It was found that the difference in buckling pressures is insignificant (less than 5 %) for length-to-radius ratios greater than 1.0. Additionally, two simplified formulas from the dozen compared were identified as particularly reliable, yielding accurate results across a wide range of shell geometries. The study further revealed that the discrepancy between theoretical and experimental buckling stresses increases as the length-to-radius ratio decreases, with the effect becoming particularly pronounced for short shells with length-to-radius ratios below 1.0. Finally, the study summarizes key aspects related to the stability of circular cylindrical shells, including imperfection sensitivity, lower bound estimates, and stiffener requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Constructional Steel Research","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 109439"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Constructional Steel Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143974X25001178","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Circular cylindrical shells are prone to buckling failure under different types of external pressure. These can include uniform lateral pressure, hydrostatic pressure (uniform lateral plus end pressure), and non-uniform wind pressure. The focus of this study is to thoroughly examine the available formulas for calculating the buckling pressure of circular cylindrical shells under these various types of external pressure and to assess their limitations. The study delves into a dozen of simplified formulas drawn from literature, discussing their derivations and comparing them with the exact solution of the problem to unveil their constraints. The study also investigates the correlations between uniform lateral and wind pressures, the effects of geometrical and material nonlinearities, and the impact of imperfections. The findings confirm that hydrostatic buckling pressure is consistently lower than lateral buckling pressure, and the conditions under which the difference between the two is negligible have been refined. It was found that the difference in buckling pressures is insignificant (less than 5 %) for length-to-radius ratios greater than 1.0. Additionally, two simplified formulas from the dozen compared were identified as particularly reliable, yielding accurate results across a wide range of shell geometries. The study further revealed that the discrepancy between theoretical and experimental buckling stresses increases as the length-to-radius ratio decreases, with the effect becoming particularly pronounced for short shells with length-to-radius ratios below 1.0. Finally, the study summarizes key aspects related to the stability of circular cylindrical shells, including imperfection sensitivity, lower bound estimates, and stiffener requirements.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Constructional Steel Research
Journal of Constructional Steel Research 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
19.50%
发文量
550
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Constructional Steel Research provides an international forum for the presentation and discussion of the latest developments in structural steel research and their applications. It is aimed not only at researchers but also at those likely to be most affected by research results, i.e. designers and fabricators. Original papers of a high standard dealing with all aspects of steel research including theoretical and experimental research on elements, assemblages, connection and material properties are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信